Profile of TAKTCOM

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Coh2 post patch performance31 Oct 2015, 09:45 AM Suddenly, but for me game performance has increased. In: Lobby
Thread: I Feel Soviets Failed Thematically.31 Oct 2015, 09:33 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 08:29 AMThoseDeafMutes USSR was something close to double the Wehrmacht. Do not forget that part of the Soviet troops was on the border with Japan. Also you talking about the Axis forces, this allows German allies or just Wehrmacht? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why some historical resemblance matters31 Oct 2015, 07:46 AM This game ignoring even basic logic and physics, how we can talk about historicity? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I Feel Soviets Failed Thematically.31 Oct 2015, 07:43 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 03:32 AMHat SU just needs more manpower. For more spam in start? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pershing feedback31 Oct 2015, 06:47 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 00:04 AMLooney I see the Pershing as a sort of fast KT. Who can not win panther Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 22:46 PMAppleseed Pershing feels more of a medium tank than a Heavy tank, don't feel it worth the 230 fu. Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 02:16 AMContrivance I agree. The Pershing definitely does not feel like a 230 Fuel tank, nor one that should be limited to just 1. My teammate says same thing plus in his opinion 13 CP too much too. In: Lobby
Thread: I Feel Soviets Failed Thematically.30 Oct 2015, 08:07 AM Design Soviet faction is disgusting, it's common knowledge. Im little happy that the developers are working on it. I'm talking about reworking T-34-76, SU-76, partyzans and T1 / T2 changes. However Devs have a lot work: increase advantage T1 and T4, reworking 1 vet almost for all soviet units, fix absurd ram T-34, fix industry and buff for KV-1 and KV-2. Also reworking old commanders abilities like "Hit the dirt!", "Rapid conscription", "Armored Vehicle Detection", IL-2 strafe and other would awesome but this I do not even hope. Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 02:05 AMMarkedRaptor Then those things got gutted and we're just stuck with a T34 way late into the game. Sure it costs 80 fuel and you can get two for the price of one panzer 4... It is hardly possible to say so - Pz.IV 350 manpower, 125 fuel, 12 cap - T-34-76 x 2, 600 manpower, 160 fuel, 20 cap So that it is more likely 2 T-34-76 vs 1 Pz.V - T-34-76 x 2, 600 manpower, 160 fuel, 20 cap - PzV Panther, 490 manpower, 175 fuel, 16 cap Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 05:54 AMThoseDeafMutes well said, +1. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T-34/76 - just little fix24 Oct 2015, 10:46 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2015, 10:13 AMJadame! Btw, how much m10 cost? 270mp 80 fuel 10 cap In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34-85 is underperforming24 Oct 2015, 05:23 AM It's almost fine. It will be fine after the ram fix and change first vet. Normal ram will work like: In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34/76 - just little fix23 Oct 2015, 06:09 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2015, 22:19 PMhannibalbarcajr Something needs to be done. Maybe just swap it out for the 34/85 since according to Soviet records, they built thousands more of the 34/85 than they did 34/76. Then you can go to the 2 34/85 commanders and change the 34/85 unlock into a 6 or 7 CP T34/76. +1, and I still like see a ram remake and first vet change. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet balance issues like IS-2 and Inf vet 1 abilities22 Oct 2015, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2015, 11:45 AMTonza I suggested that somekind of "Oorah"-like ability to soviet T-34 would be cool, especially if speed bonus is increased by more soviet tanks in close vicinity. Sounds like 'Flanking Speed' from M10 Wolverine In: COH2 Balance