Profile of JohnnyB

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198090176100


Thread: Foucs on the details, Relic, Plz20 Aug 2014, 08:11 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Aug 2014, 07:59 AMSlaYoU Stopped reading after that. It just means i know quite a bit about how the industry works, and no, it is not revolving around what YOU think is the most important thing in the game's existence. You feel a bug is game breaking, fine, you report it, and eventually, it will be fixed. They won't stop everything else because that bug bothers you. The writer of the article is spot on, and it explains facts. If you can't accept them, it's your problem. Working in the bank should make you more aware about CUSTOMER POLICY, or CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT. He is right. After all, I HAVE ALL THE RIGHT IN THE WORLD to say to you I DON'T CARE about your internal problems, you give me the product I paid for, and that I expected. It's your problem how you manage your internal resources, it's not MY CONCERN! That is why I said it's debatable, meaning I understand how things work, I HAVE BEEN THERE, in a multinational (and even a financial institution similar to a bank) and I know how carefull they were related to CUSTOMER SATISFACTION. Playing the smart guy won't help you, anyway your link says all about it when you read that phrase there: “The customer is always right!” and the answer that you love: "No, the customer is usually an idiot who has no clue." In: Lobby
Thread: Foucs on the details, Relic, Plz20 Aug 2014, 07:12 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Aug 2014, 07:06 AMSlaYoU A bit of reading for you http://mrlizard.com/rants/why-havent-they-fixed-this-bug/ Maybe you'll understand it has nothing to do with Relic, but yay whatever, you won't even take the time to read that link. Still i can agree that some bugs have been there for a long time, yet you blame the wrong people. Well I actually read it. Not saying it's untrue, but still debatable. In: Lobby
Thread: Foucs on the details, Relic, Plz20 Aug 2014, 07:07 AM I am also displeased by the fact that Relic is not focusing on fixing bugs (like game freezing and sooo many others) but rather on creating new features in order to make the game more commercial. In: Lobby
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?20 Aug 2014, 07:04 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Aug 2014, 06:05 AMJinseual I would like to have the Tiger tanks to have a range buff instead of blitzkreig ability so they could duel out with the SU85s and Jacksons. In turn the Jacksons would be able to 100 pct penetrate any tank or 90 pct whatever.... chance and SU85s be cheaper forming a PAK front to defeat any heavy threat by numbers. Perhaps a periscope ability? All this range increase suggestions related to Tiger are correct! Tiger could hit a target from 2000 meters. How is this showed in this game? By range 40?! Remove the blitz I say. Keep Tiger as it is. But give it a realistic range. The Panther's range I would say. The Tiger canon was even better than the Panthers's. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shocks20 Aug 2014, 06:59 AM Shocks have several weaknesses: - they cost alot to call-in and to reinforce. Used extensively, they can drain your manpower; - they are efficient only in close quorter combat though they have no problem reaching it. So they must be kept at distance; - they got no AT. So what we learn from this? - Use something that kills them quickly enough. Like mines, snipers, vehicles (especialy AA vehicles); - Keep them at distance as much as possible by supressing them or by moving your units backwards. Concentrate all your infantry fire on one squad at a time; - use vehicles (even light vehicles to chase and kill them). There you are. No, they are not inbalanced. I frankly prefer to be "shocked" than "tanked" or "ISUed" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 14:00 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 13:58 PMSteiner500 The surviveability of some German Tanks is slightly too high, especially from Panther This statement is hilarious. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 13:29 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 13:22 PMausterlitz What replacement?What are u guys even considering conceding to this insult? Elefant,panther extinction wasn't enough for u guys? is-2s armor that laughs off 3 pz 4s is not enough for u? Why should ostheer armor be nerfed and nerfed and nerfed into the corner and ground continously while isu continues its reign of terror for 5 months?while allied medium call-ins dirt cheap beat every one of our mid game options,while panther remains extinct and pak 43 and elefant were destroyed? Fuck them all.Bunch of noobs aren't happy with like 100 soviet lategame options while one last ostheer tank must die. Though I agree with some of the issues you pointed out, or better said, shout it out , I must frankly ask you: what would you prefer? Keeping this ability or have the Tiger it was before last nerf? I have to admit that I would like the last option while playing germans In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 13:20 PM Remove the blitzkrieg ability from Tiger then, but give back its stats before the last nerf. just removing blitzkrieg would not sound fair. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do Tigers really need Blitzkrieg?19 Aug 2014, 11:54 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 11:45 AMTheMachine All 3 of which are negated by Blitzkrieg. This is our problem. Well why don't you look from the oposite way? This is the only chance a PIV may have to destroy a su-85. But oh, we were talking about Tigers here. So explain me how a slow turtle with a verry small speed boost can hope to efficiently flank or reach a Su-85? If you keep backing up, Tiger won't reach your su-85 not even with the mother of blitzkrieg, before it will take cover after the zis wall. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why are we still keeping that simplified upkeep system?19 Aug 2014, 11:48 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Aug 2014, 10:42 AMFanatic Thats wrong, Sir. From my experience its about equal. Depending on the current meta game of course. CoH1´s upkeep / income system is brilliant idea. General speaking. And i am sad it wasn´t implemented in CoH2. Since the popcap system is also gone there are two important monitoring mechanisms missing. I never saw a Paratrooper or Ranger blob and i am an active CoH1 Player since 4 years. In fact these two units provide a good example that the system actually works since they are to expensive in matters of upkeep and reinforce costs (and popcap aswell) to spam them. The system works nice in a US vs WH matchup. But it never worked for PE or Brits. Which is one of the reasons why British blobs work (there are several others of course, Lui Boni / Vet for example). But with some testing am sure it would be possible to make it work for OF factions as well. And for CoH2 too. But we will never know, Relic won't consider such a huge chance. To be honest a gren blob isn´t actually a problem in the current sniper dominated meta game. I think i don´t need to say anything about the popcap system. It´s just bad in CoH2. Popcap should depend on the amount of sectors you control. In this two cases Relic chose the easy way. And sometimes the easy way comes with a price someone has to pay. I never played vCoh again since 6 months before COH2 release date, but I have played it for 6 years I guess and I am realy surprised you never met a paras blob or a ranger blob. You missed alot . In: COH2 Gameplay