Profile of ☭ Калашникова ☭

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 322

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Temp1st


Thread: Wehrmacht Ostheer26 Dec 2014, 02:55 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2014, 02:44 AMMr. Someguy Also in response to "Grenadiers will beat Riflemen at long range" I've decided to test it. Squad vs Squad controlled test, long range, no cover, no vet, no outside factors, no retreating, 20 attempts. Grenadiers won 9 times and Riflemen won 11 times. The number of survivors per-lane is as follows: Surviving Grenadiers: 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Surviving Riflemen: 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 In other words, with both sides on equal footing, victory is mostly RNG. You may take one casualty or lose the squad and anything in between. Riflemen seem to have a very slight statistical advantage, but they have a completely advantage in any sort of actual fight unless Grenadiers are caught in heavy cover and force Rifles to charge. But of course Grens in heavy cover aren't out capping, and heavy cover isn't always available nor can they create it. They can however make building cover. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs26 Dec 2014, 00:38 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2014, 00:23 AMAustralian Magic And give a Tiger veterancy... Sometimes you prepare ambush, enemy is falling into but you can't chase down one-shot Tiger with Jackson which is annoying. On the other hand Axis and Soviets can do this. If Jackson at least has something to increase sight (it does not have roof for a purpose - to increase sight but we don't see this in game). And what mines? US Forces don't have a mines - only from M20 So mines or AT gun. Not both That mine is a non doctrinal regal, The tiger won't be retreating. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: artillery and late game squadwipes26 Dec 2014, 00:15 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 23:52 PMAustralian Magic B-4 can kill KT in 1 shot only with Mother Russia or Mark Target is also needed? I don;t rememeber... vet 3 b4 with FMR on can 1 shot anything short of a okw truck (80% damage) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht Ostheer25 Dec 2014, 22:17 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 22:09 PMJaigen then they have issues period and if i look on the stats correctly the soviets are also dominating the ost. surprising since cheesy tacts like sniper spam, maxim spam and the power of the early game m3 causes this. issues that the okw doesnt suffer. A lot of these problems could be solved if 222 was not such a piece of useless trash that's a waste of fuel mp and mu. Wehrmacht suffers from some poor units early game being mainly: MG-42 Sniper 222 This kind of pigeonholes Wehr to go gren spam every game, Maybe a mortar or a mg here and there but certainly not the centerpiece of Wehrs early game. Wehr stands on pretty much grens pzgrens and paks alone until tanks come. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: VI B and Teching25 Dec 2014, 22:11 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 21:32 PMelchino7 If the meta wasn't ruled by callins, imagine being 120fuel behind withouat access to T3/T4. At least OH buildings is cheaper due to expensive tech. AND USF has a big annoying base. The base wouldn't be so bad if they just rotated the base to have the retreat point and the weapon racks facing the battlefield instead of back in the farthest corner of the base. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs25 Dec 2014, 05:56 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 05:34 AM89456132 What if armour had a maximum and minimum value, and where you keep taking hits your armour goes down to the minimum value? Heavily armoured tanks would then be good for the surprise blitzkrieg but couldn't as easily trudge through defensively placed AT. ZiS/57mm guns against KTs would actually have an effect then, not necessarily in damage but in softening the target for SU85s/Jacksons. Having minimum armour wouldn't need to mean the tank turns into paper, just easier to penetrate after getting hit so much. That would take a while.. imagine KT: This tiger suffered 255 AT hits in the course of 6 hours including 3 mines And drove back to safety on its own engine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: artillery and late game squadwipes25 Dec 2014, 05:23 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 04:41 AMCieZ The fact of the matter is that if you do not have the only reliable answer (stuka dive bomb) to the B4, you're pretty much screwed. I'm not saying you WILL lose to game... but it is going to be extraordinarily difficult and certainly not in your favor. This pigeonholes Axis into having a Stuka dive bomb as part of their team composition because other off-maps will not guarantee a fully destroyed B4. In a team comp Wehrmacht have a few very effective ways of killing a B4: CAS: Recon pass + AT Strafe (140 MU) CAS: Recon pass + Stuka (190) Luftwaffe supply: Recon plane + Stuka (240) Jaeger armor: Recon plane + Stuka (240) Doctrines that require ally recon or unit recon: Storm doctrine: Stuka (160) Ostruppen: Railway (240) Festung armor: Railway (240) As for OKW.. well Hope hes stupid and you can assault arti or do dual stuka. For wehr though there is several options Stuka and railway are both very reliable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs25 Dec 2014, 03:24 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 03:07 AMNuclear Arbitor you're missing 90% of what he's saying, which is that the average pen of allied AT weapons and the heavy armour of axis tanks can have a serious effect on gameplay and win or lose games. Oh but i don't think that i am, Pen is a problem for some allied tanks, Just as accuracy can own axis tanks by repeated misses with low firerate (Panther) KT is slow enough that you should be able to stay out of its range jackson's with ease. And like any superheavy surrounds with mediums owns it. In OKW's case if he hard tech's to it (Some OKW's do this) hes spending 504 effective fuel. and 1320 manpower. with sov you can almost have 4 t34/76 by that time. Same with USF and Jacksons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs25 Dec 2014, 02:58 AM So.. to sum this up "Nerf KT plz"? Hate to pass it off so causually but thats what i got out of this. Ah missed something, Before the buff Wehr's panther was not worth the cost at 175. The armor buff made the unit worth building again for wehr. While T4 is still kinda in the dumps as a whole at least the panther is worth the tech cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht Ostheer25 Dec 2014, 01:31 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 01:18 AMbroodwarjc And the problem with Gren LMGs is that it makes them static and blobs are so mobile that the range advantage of the LMG is good for only a few seconds and then the BARs start overwhelming it. Plus explosives are too strong now and 4 men static Gren squads get wiped frequently. Highley situational. Grens are a tough baselane infantry with lmg's that can stand up to most threats including bar rifles when micro'd and positioned correctley. Better than using that gimp HMG-42 or "Yolo 1 shot sniper" In: COH2 Balance