Profile of ☭ Калашникова ☭

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 322

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Temp1st


Thread: artillery and late game squadwipes25 Dec 2014, 01:27 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2014, 00:20 AMAustralian Magic You need 1 Stuka to decrew and decrewing vetteg B-4 is equal to losing it. Off map frim Jadg doctrine can wreck B-4 if it's builded near point. You can use also Falsch or Jaeger on many maps to decrew it. All you need to do as Axis is to veto some maps like crossing woods where B-4 is base can rape Axis base. But on the other hand Train and Steel (I belive it's name in english) is a map that allows you to use falsch very efficiently and B-4 has to be build outside of the base - at least first line of points. ____ B-4 buff is not needed. If i spend 240 MU on recon + stuka i expect it to be destoyed. I am cutting 4 LMG/Shreck/almost 5 tellers Mines to do that. Also if hes dumb enough to build a b4 next to a strat point its a l2p issue. For referance the english term is "Rails and Metal" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht Ostheer25 Dec 2014, 00:12 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2014, 17:37 PMmaskedmonkey2 If your mg gets flanked, you didn't mg correctly. It seems that the only points you have are that if you get out-played you lose. That is the way it is supposed to be, and wouldn't be much of a game without it. Half the time the MG-42 Doesn't have to be flanked that's the problem. Rifles smoke it And Scripts oorah and moly it or shocks smoke and close on it. But assuming these things don't happen, It comes down to why would I want to cut a gren squad for something that is unreliable? The 42 is just not good enough to want to cut a gren for one, barring specific maps. Even then a MG bunker is most of the time a better choice. And I am not sure how much clearer I could make it, grens win v rifleman at range. Do what you have to do to keep them away. This is literally no different to keeping a jackson at range to a kt, it is the exact same concept. Using units to their strengths is the ENTIRE point of the game. Maybe so, but he will have more rifles then you do grens most of the time. And grens will only win with LMG's. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: artillery and late game squadwipes24 Dec 2014, 23:53 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2014, 17:07 PMpigsoup nerf b4 range, so if it is build in your base, it is purely defensive. thus offensive b4 is more susceptible to infantry assaults or coordinated attack increase health so it survives stuka dive bomb with like 100 hp. also can we make it so it can shoot through buildings or would that be too much? Ok two things about this: 1- Why should the best sationary howitzer in the game hands down be the only one that is Stuka/IL2/ToT immune? 2- If this were to happen LeFH would need a massive buff to give ost a reliable counter. Not to mention that currently OKW has no go to counter other than yolo rushing it or 2x Stuka and hope to god you can get in range. B4 doesn't need buffs. The other pieces need buffs like ML and LeFH. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: artillery and late game squadwipes24 Dec 2014, 11:28 AM It has so much scatter i wonder if its bugged. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: artillery and late game squadwipes24 Dec 2014, 10:41 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2014, 09:57 AMIron Emperor The Pak-43 shouldn't be there. My old love for the joint ops doc is coming up I want to like it, Lefh is not worth it. panzerwerfer is just better. As for the pak there are better pak 43 doctrines like Festung armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: artillery and late game squadwipes24 Dec 2014, 09:56 AM Please tell me how a PAK-43 counters a B4? Same with the Ele In: COH2 Balance
Thread: artillery and late game squadwipes24 Dec 2014, 09:32 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2014, 05:34 AMLemonJuice and which okw doctrine innately counters b4? none of them do. in fact the only guaranteed way to kill a b4 is with a sturmtiger, which wont happen in most games. The closest thing that can kill a B4 via offmap is Assault arti (This assumes hes dumb enough to put it near a point) If not dual Stuka is the way okw clears it. 200+ fuel investment to kill a single 600mp b4. Also you guys are forgetting something: OST CAS doctrine can clear a B4 for a mere 140 mu. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger Ace12 Dec 2014, 14:38 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2014, 14:34 PMMittens It definitely needs a fuel cost tbh. If I remember right, it comes out at 12 cp right? Maybe docking it to 10/11 would make it more viable 12 cp rofl.. It comes out at 15! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger Ace12 Dec 2014, 14:33 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2014, 14:17 PMakula give it a fuel cost. As long as the reduced income goes and cp is lowered then yeah. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW, the root of most balance issues?11 Dec 2014, 23:16 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Dec 2014, 22:58 PMJaigen it has nothing to do with the okw however more of the ostheer buffing the okw economy skyhigh thats is the problem in teamgames. in 1vs 1 they are fine. The issue that most people have with the okw is that can produce units that can immeadtely affect the flow While this is true ost has to put forward MP to do it, cutting a squad every cache. This combined with there tech times and costs can put them behind even if you are feeding the OKW with caches. In the case of Luft supply, The doctrine is really not that amazing without the supply drops, CAS is just better. Both cases require ost to give up something to pump fuel. Giving OKW normal fuel income and adjusting all there fuel costs (+30%?) would be better then things like caches and luft supply would not pump them insane amounts of fuel. For instance it would take 5 fuel drops to get enough for a KT, if the cost didn't have this weird % modifier it would take 7 drops. costing a additional 400 MP In: COH2 Balance