Profile of ☭ Калашникова ☭

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 322

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Temp1st


Thread: A suggestion to Luftwaffe Supply Drop27 Dec 2014, 01:51 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2014, 23:02 PMvan Voort Yeah we are not really disagreeing about that. However its really good at offsetting OKWs fuel penalty and getting their tanks out sooner; KTs can already come very fast in team games and this just makes them come sooner. And Luftwaffe also comes with counters to the B4 that is one of the major counters to OKW, however CAS also does that The problem is two fold: 1: Luft supply doct is a gimmick doctrine that is only for supply drops, The other thing it had got nerfed hard (Med box's) While I agree that fuel boosting is really dumb, Once that is taken away OST will be down another useable doctrine without some changes to the med box's to make them more attractive again. 2: OKW's screwed up income mechanic - Because it has a % modifier on its fuel income things like supply drop completely ignores it. If it was normal income with the fuel costs added on the top (i.e. Puma costing 105 fuel with no penalty) and tone down the conversion rates accordingly this kind of thing would not be such a problem. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: A suggestion to Luftwaffe Supply Drop26 Dec 2014, 12:45 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2014, 12:09 PMvan Voort Seriously? Caches are a better long term investment that helps everybody, and I would be really upset with an OKH player who did fuel drops rather build them first But, getting fuel like that allows fast teching for an early Panther or an early KT. There are four commanders that "break" the economy like that: Soviet Industry trades MP for fuel constantly, and usually means that MP becomes the limit on their builds. As such it is a little gimped right now Ostruppen and CAS have fuel to munitions conversion, but the off map call ins that that can power don't kick in until higher CP values so their effect early game is somewhat muted. A main advantage is that once you have your armour out and are at pop cap you can use all the fuel you have building up. If Luftwaffe did the same thing as that but with MP it would be a lot better. Ya, Srsly anything you would pick Luftwaffe for barring the fuel drop cheese CAS does better. Early game power? Well luft box's don't do it anymore very well might as well switch fuel to muni for more lmg = CAS better 6 CP anti infantry ability? Arguable but I tend to think the strafe run is better than that incend strike. = CAS equal if not better. Supply drop? When not used for cheese but to fuel your commander CAS does it without securing a muni point and keeping a squad around doing nothing for 60 sec except picking up box's = CAS equal because it can't do the fuel cheese. Recon run's? = CAS better because it does it cheaper. Stuka dive bomb? = same thing on both commanders And then finally cas has a AT strafe that is extremely potent on any vehicle. Add in that the Wehr player can still build fuel caches that are effective throughout the game without the need to fuel blitz cheese a KT by 12 mins. Admittedly I agree it is BS that it is able to do that but if your gonna nerf the supply drop Un nerf the boxes some back to pre WF release. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs26 Dec 2014, 10:58 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2014, 10:20 AMAustralian Magic So in fact US Forces have to use Jackson because there is no other unit which could be used in late game. How broken is that? Soviets have: IS, ISU, SU (better pen than Jackson and sefl spotting) and T34/85+Mark Target, ZiS Ost: Tiger, Tiger Ace, Panther, Elephnat, Pak43, Pak40. OKW: schreck blob, Panther, Sturmtiger, King Tiger, Jadgtiger, Pak43 USF: Jackson... Even E8 is not usefull since Panther wrecks it and there is nothing like mark target to use them efficiently like T34. So in fact if you won't pick up P47 you are going to have really bad time in late-game. How often do you see any other doctrine in 1v1/2v2? Airborne is in about 80% of the games because USF lack of late-game AT units. Imagine situation where Ost player is forced to take JU in every game because if he won't he will lose. Oh so you mean like stuka dive bomb doct and b4? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A suggestion to Luftwaffe Supply Drop26 Dec 2014, 09:42 AM The problem is not the supply drop its that box's suck now. Hes cutting 200 MP for 50 fuel. He could of spent that 200 mp on a cache or a unit. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs26 Dec 2014, 09:38 AM If your already loosing to a aggressive USF and holding out to 15 CP (Instead of 11) TA won't save you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 26 Dec 2014, 07:17 AM Just ready aim time and green cover and it would be in a good spot In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 26 Dec 2014, 04:11 AM Maybe, it would have to be tested. it is literally okw's only reliable at if you take shrecks away until a puma or JP4. And because of this change everyone would always opt for the puma. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs26 Dec 2014, 03:59 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2014, 03:50 AMsherlock I think that the perception that the Jackson is less reliable than the panther manly stems from what they face up against in a typical game. If we go as far to assume that everyone always builds an is2 in 2v2s (meta) and assume that we always see a tiger from ostheer (because the jackson counters t3 very effectively and most deem t4 as too expensive) and panhters from okw (meta). Then the panther is confronting is2 (extreme case assumed with no t3 or t4), shermans, jacksons and everything bellow. The jackson faces tigers and panthers (no t3 from ost). The panther does very well penetration wise against everything smaller than the is2 (higher than 90%) and penetrates the is2 in 58% of all cases, while the jackson is facing panthers and tigers for which it has a chance of penetrating of 55% or 53% respectively. It is like you state, the jackson is not a worse tank hunter but it is a bit harder to use and the current favourite strategy pits it almost exclusively against the hardest to crack tanks. The reason for this is the Jackson is a excellent TD, It completely owns Wehr T3 and is strong vs Tiger I and Panthers. If Wehr players thought they could have a chance to fight Jackson's with P4 they would. not to mention that Stug is just a joke when going up vs Jackson's To be completely honest I would rather fight Jackson's with Panthers than a Tiger I but I guess that's just me preferring the better speed and armor of the Panther. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht Ostheer26 Dec 2014, 03:13 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Dec 2014, 03:07 AMMr. Someguy They can, but it's not feasible at the start of the game. It costs manpower, is restricted to friendly territory, and has a longer build-time than sandbags. You can't build and cap, nor can you make many squads if you start spamming bunkers right away. It provides no benefit to Wehrmacht vs USF at the start. I said nothing about feasibility all I was simply stating was they can make a cover type. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 26 Dec 2014, 03:01 AM If Shreck was removed from Volks, Raketen needs to be way better than it is now. Perhaps even give it green cover. It would still have the lowest range, and terrible ready aim time. In: COH2 Balance