Profile of austerlitz

Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 17:34 PMKatitof

It'll be fine at 140.

P4J are not supposed to win against it 1v1 given it was inferior to P4 H so that isn't an argument.

Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 16:54 PMKatitof

You have confused EZ8 with brummbar. Mine puppchens have no problem forcing off/killing EZ8s.
I forgive you thou, it must be hard to see through constant stream of tears.


1)who talks about scavenge doctrine?
2)you still get over 80% of fuel income, can't complain about that really, random vet of the tanks also isn't something you can ignore.


Ever heard one of the following terms when dealing with opponents tanks?

-PaK40
-panzershreck
-teller mine
-infantry support

Also, vetted rifles are problem for you?
Have you tried, I don't know, stop playing in offline mode against AI and update game to the latest patch?

You know what, nevermind, if you play on a skill level where blobbing anything is effective you wouldn't understand it anyway.



Yes.
I'm in denial.
I can't allow my brain to accept a sole thought that someone would be stupid enough to not use combined arms on the army that have most powerful support teams and for some odd reason expect grens into tiger/P4 spam to work against a player who have a brain developed more then average potato.

Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 16:25 PMKatitof

Do you realize that being able to scavenge armor and team weapons as well as conversion truck make your argument completely void?

Its 90 fuel per tank no matter how you want to spin it.

And do you want to know what is effective against EZ8?

Shrecks and puppchens, because they don't have HE muni and their AI is worse then 34/85, which means infantry is more then a match against it.

You don't fight rock with scissors, you use paper.
Being fixated to the level of obsession on using scissors against rock and failing doesn't mean the rock is op, it means you are in denial of using paper which is the case of 90% balance discussions here.

You don't use weaker tanks against stronger tanks and expect them to win.
Well, maybe you do.

Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 10:52 AMCyridius

Maybe we should just delete Rifle Company. Seeing as the only useful thing in it is the Easy-Eight since the Vet Riflemen for some nonsensical reason have a 80 second cooldown at the start of the game, which defeats the main point of their existence.

Seeing as everyone on this forum pretty much insists on bitching until every single useful American unit or commander is nerfed into the ground, I'm just going to suggest removing the commander and replacing him with something the German players that populate this forum wont constantly whine about.

I bet once when E8 is nerfed you'll start complaining about vanilla riflemen, too, huh? Or maybe how the AT Rifle Nade consistently causes engine damage? Actually, no, I bet it'll be Paratroopers - like anybody uses those useless fucks lol.

The E8 is fucking fine. It's the only American tank that can manfight another tank - when properly micor'd - is doctrinal, is very late game, and is not a cheap tank. It doesn't reliably penetrate the front armour of any heavy tanks(I don't know what shit you guys are fucking smoking, pass it over) and its performance against infantry is mediocre and only becomes decent with the .50cal upgrade, and is passed out by the vanilla Sherman using HE shells. The PzIV fills the same role as the E8 but costs less (350/125) so naturally it will get beaten, but can still win if mirco'd well enough.

The E8 is not penetrating too much. The E8 is not too cheap. The E8 is not doing too much damage. Try playing USF if everything about them is so fucking strong and get out of your comfort zone.