Login

russian armor

New USF doctrine is too good

26 Jun 2019, 16:27 PM
#21
avatar of GI John 412

Posts: 495 | Subs: 1

I would've also rather seen the addition of the EZ8 instead of the bulldozer stuff. EZ8 is already fantastic, just not accessible. Kinda like how rangers were.... but then they got buffed... cause they weren't good... Kappa

Powercreep of most new doctrines has been very prevalent though. OKW overwatch is a prime example.



+1


Agree on a whole lot of that.

Easy Eight is a cool unit that could use more love instead of silly bulldozers. So I’d be happy to see that in more doctrines, but probably not in Urban Assault.

On the subject of power creep, I agree that it is in fact happening with the new doctrines, but how to deal with it is up for debate.

The important thing about balancing the game is to end up with, you guessed it, balance. Lol So you have two options. You either buff all of the commanders to the new power level or you nerf all the commanders down to the old level.

From what I’ve seen, USF, OKW and UKF all have very strong commanders in general, but they have far fewer total commanders than WM and Soviets. WM and Soviet commanders are all over the place, with some being on par with the best WFA commanders, while same are quite poor.

It seems to me that the easiest way to make all commanders in balance with each other is to nerf the really outstandingly good ones down just a little, and then buff up the weaker ones to the higher power level.

Using the USF as an example, you have a bunch of commanders that are very good, a couple that are pretty good but not quite top level, and then you have Rifle Company which is pretty bad in comparison. So the easiest way to make all USF commanders in line with each other is to just buff Rifle Company a bit and now USF commanders are now all viable options and therefore balanced with each other.

Apply the same logic to the other factions and you can end up with a bunch of “OP” commanders, but since everyone is OP, no one is.
26 Jun 2019, 17:14 PM
#26
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

if u fell it's too good why not lock the special ammo behind the dozer upgrade ?
26 Jun 2019, 17:22 PM
#27
avatar of GI John 412

Posts: 495 | Subs: 1

if u fell it's too good why not lock the special ammo behind the dozer upgrade ?


+1

You could also make upgrading to the bulldozer blade/ WP shell package lock out regular HE shells. This would kinda make sense if the crews had to unload all of their HE shells to make room for the WP shells.

This could be done a few ways. You either leave the ability as a pay to shoot like it is now, and HE shells are simply locked out, or you make the load WP shells replace the HE shells in the toggle ability. You could reduce the rate of fire but give it high accuracy to the WP shells if you make them replace the HE shells so you don’t just spray WP everywhere. I like the idea of the WP being a slow but accurate auto fire that replaces HE shells. It would be hectic and confusing in tank fights too if you left it on WP so your Sherman is randomly putting WP shells into a charging Panther, doing no damage but messing up everyone’s visibility, friend and foe alike! Lol

Either way, by preventing the Sherman from shooting WP and then following up with HE shells you reduce its ability to wipe AT guns by itself, but it would still be very powerful when used in conjunction with infantry, mortars or another Sherman that doesn’t have the bulldozer upgrade.
26 Jun 2019, 19:15 PM
#28
avatar of RollingStone

Posts: 173

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 12:58 PMKatitof


So, I was right after all, you were not aware of them.


Next time, pls, clarify that you meant two of 12 infantry units of OKW that have Blenderkopfer nades. Because "infantry" have quite large meaning.

Noone actually uses them, AFAIK - mostly because they are locked behind 2 most expensice squads in whole army composition. Same stuff that now assault tommies have.

However, tommies are mainlane infantry, not some elite of arian race, and that might lead to some problems.

And, same ability also located in UKF - AFAIK, Comet can shoot WP shells at vet1. Again, almost noone really uses it, at least i've never seen that one, and again, because it is locked to one of most expencive unit in whole army.

And now, the main, universal and rather cheapish USF tank have those shells. Same sutiation as with ass.tommies.
26 Jun 2019, 19:25 PM
#29
avatar of Neneko007

Posts: 13

Its not like any other tank besides the pz4 and stug have any respect for allies AT guns. Shot bounce like the of there is no tommorow.
26 Jun 2019, 19:26 PM
#30
avatar of Balanced_Gamer

Posts: 783

I think this new USF commander is pretty good.

The Riflenade for Echelons makes it a real lethal unit. It is like a free nade toss every 5 seconds. Really pushes the enemy to move a lot out of cover. Quite annoying I would say. I think it be great if it were a default option and if it were accessible across other factions also! Increase diversity and to some extent, increase micro intensity across all factions! Can be a game changer!


The Sherman upgrade is cool making it very deadly and somewhat a better choice than Jackson in most situations. Since it has improved armour when upgraded, extra health making it a 5 shot instead and it has extra utility. Enhanced Anti Infantry capabilities with Phosphorous shot. Makes it one of the best upgrades you can get for mediums. In fact becomes the best medium in game in my opinion once upgraded.

Other things also.

I feel overall this commander is somewhat balanced, although the riflenades can be devastating and very effective in many situations, much more devastating than a flamethrower due to its overall effectiveness.

It has a lot of utility that comes in real handy, making infantry do overall better as well as Sherman capabilities.

It is like a package that makes USF overall stronger. Strengthen Echelon, Shermans and Riflemen. It is really a useful commander. Mobile Arty as a package included which fulfills their wishes! Everything the USF needs to be made "great again".
26 Jun 2019, 20:21 PM
#31
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 10:24 AMLago


They're really not.


White Phosphorous shells are insanely good: before this you only got them on a Comet.

Giving them to the Sherman, a unit that already has the excellent HE rounds, turns it into a superlative anti-tank gun killer.

Throw in the armour upgrade and it also gains the edge over medium tanks: you've made is about as tough as an Easy Eight.

+1

Except doesn't bulldozer upgrade only give extra health, not armor too?

I'd rather see like a WP barrage for the mortar instead of the sherman if it gets replaced with anything at all.
26 Jun 2019, 20:25 PM
#32
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


+1

Except doesn't bulldozer upgrade only give extra health, not armor too?

I'd rather see like a WP barrage for the mortar instead of the sherman if it gets replaced with anything at all.

Its health and armor, you have it in the patch notes.
ddd
26 Jun 2019, 20:32 PM
#33
avatar of ddd

Posts: 528 | Subs: 1

I predicted it in the usf commander suggestions thread:

WP shells on HE Sherman and sprinting Rangers too strong - Gets nerfed fast - Joins NKVD in Premium Tier Commanders List

If you listened to all these people that wanted to see Easy8 here and told you sprinting Rangers is not a good idea there wouldnt be a problem.

26 Jun 2019, 20:39 PM
#34
avatar of Jae For Jett
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 20:32 PMddd

If you listened to all these people that wanted to see Easy8 here and told you sprinting Rangers is not a good idea there wouldnt be a problem.


What you probably mean is that there would be a different post about how we made rifle company even more useless (while also making the new commander itself useless) and how if we didnt put the ez8 in then there wouldnt be a problem.
ddd
26 Jun 2019, 20:57 PM
#35
avatar of ddd

Posts: 528 | Subs: 1


What you probably mean is that there would be a different post about how we made rifle company even more useless (while also making the new commander itself useless) and how if we didnt put the ez8 in then there wouldnt be a problem.


How would i complain about easy8 when i was one of the people suggesting it?

And how would it make rifle company useless assuming you wouldnt change one thing about this commander?

And final question, do you really think rifle company is useful in its current state?
26 Jun 2019, 21:14 PM
#36
avatar of murky depths

Posts: 607

Obviously he means other people would complain.

No matter what happens, no matter what gets buffed or nerfed or changed or added or cut, people will complain. If not you, then someone else.
ddd
26 Jun 2019, 21:35 PM
#37
avatar of ddd

Posts: 528 | Subs: 1

Obviously he means other people would complain.

No matter what happens, no matter what gets buffed or nerfed or changed or added or cut, people will complain. If not you, then someone else.


Obviously few people who come to usf threads only to troll around and say that everything remotely good "would cause issues" will complain no matter what but you can just ignore them.

There were bunch of people in suggestions thread and on reddit saying they would like to see easy8 because its forghotten unit in shitty doc. Easy8 + WP shell would be as "overpowered" as Comet.

On the other hand, did anyone really think that HE Sherman needs better anti infantry capabilities of all things?
27 Jun 2019, 15:03 PM
#38
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

WP shells are ultimate FU only to mindless blobbers and pak wall enthusiasts
Though they are obviously too powerful to give them to plain Shermans, they would've been fine on E8, would've also fit better since Rifle Company has WP offmap
27 Jun 2019, 15:11 PM
#39
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

I'm still thinking that giving them a meatshield tank in the form of the Jumbo would be a better alternative than cheap and borderline OP gimmicks for the regular Sherman but that's just me I guess.
27 Jun 2019, 15:51 PM
#40
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

I'm still thinking that giving them a meatshield tank in the form of the Jumbo would be a better alternative than cheap and borderline OP gimmicks for the regular Sherman but that's just me I guess.


USF does need a meatshield tank. The only problem with your suggestion is that there isn't a model for the Jumbo, unless Relic would be willing to use the model for the Easy 8 as the model for the Jumbo. I'd be happy with even a non-doctrinal Easy 8 (make it a side upgrade on Tier 3). If that happened, Rifle Company could replace the Easy 8 with the Pershing which would help that commander greatly.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
Last Wednesday, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
Last Wednesday, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
Last Wednesday, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
Rosbone: They dont care about Coh3 or Coh in general. They are just trying to grab cash by ripping off the small user base they have.
13 Mar 2025, 19:58 PM
Rosbone: Just making mistake after mistake after mistake.
13 Mar 2025, 19:57 PM
Rosbone: It is clear they crapped out an unfinished game. And are now barely supporting it as they make new smaller games. Coh3 is stillborn. It will be meh for at least another 2-4 years. Meaning they killed the whole franchise instead of growing it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:56 PM
Rosbone: For a thing they could fix in minutes. Literally minutes.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: If I did play coh3 and was mainly a skirmish player, I would be pissed and probably stop playing. And it has been like this since release. Why? I would not tell my friends to buy a game I am not even playing. Lost sales and angered users.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: I am just saddened how Relic keeps hurting themselves by not fixing 5 minute things like menus. Why anger users with stuff that could be fixed in minutes???
13 Mar 2025, 19:50 PM
Rosbone: I was wondering why people think I was raging. I think it was when I said "because coh3 sucks so bad". That was not my opinion. Just a general feel from top players/streamers. I dont play Coh3 and have NO opinion of it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:48 PM
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
12 Mar 2025, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
12 Mar 2025, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
12 Mar 2025, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
12 Mar 2025, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
12 Mar 2025, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
12 Mar 2025, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
12 Mar 2025, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
12 Mar 2025, 03:51 AM
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
07 Mar 2025, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
06 Mar 2025, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
06 Mar 2025, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
06 Mar 2025, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! :P
06 Mar 2025, 10:49 AM
Willy Pete: Cool you wanna lose your stock lategame arty too then?
06 Mar 2025, 03:20 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. :rofl:
05 Mar 2025, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

384 users are online: 384 guests
1 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
50 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53676
Welcome our newest member, Kelfe30546
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM