Login

russian armor

New USF doctrine is too good

26 Jun 2019, 16:27 PM
#21
avatar of GI John 412

Posts: 495 | Subs: 1

I would've also rather seen the addition of the EZ8 instead of the bulldozer stuff. EZ8 is already fantastic, just not accessible. Kinda like how rangers were.... but then they got buffed... cause they weren't good... Kappa

Powercreep of most new doctrines has been very prevalent though. OKW overwatch is a prime example.



+1


Agree on a whole lot of that.

Easy Eight is a cool unit that could use more love instead of silly bulldozers. So I’d be happy to see that in more doctrines, but probably not in Urban Assault.

On the subject of power creep, I agree that it is in fact happening with the new doctrines, but how to deal with it is up for debate.

The important thing about balancing the game is to end up with, you guessed it, balance. Lol So you have two options. You either buff all of the commanders to the new power level or you nerf all the commanders down to the old level.

From what I’ve seen, USF, OKW and UKF all have very strong commanders in general, but they have far fewer total commanders than WM and Soviets. WM and Soviet commanders are all over the place, with some being on par with the best WFA commanders, while same are quite poor.

It seems to me that the easiest way to make all commanders in balance with each other is to nerf the really outstandingly good ones down just a little, and then buff up the weaker ones to the higher power level.

Using the USF as an example, you have a bunch of commanders that are very good, a couple that are pretty good but not quite top level, and then you have Rifle Company which is pretty bad in comparison. So the easiest way to make all USF commanders in line with each other is to just buff Rifle Company a bit and now USF commanders are now all viable options and therefore balanced with each other.

Apply the same logic to the other factions and you can end up with a bunch of “OP” commanders, but since everyone is OP, no one is.
26 Jun 2019, 17:14 PM
#26
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

if u fell it's too good why not lock the special ammo behind the dozer upgrade ?
26 Jun 2019, 17:22 PM
#27
avatar of GI John 412

Posts: 495 | Subs: 1

if u fell it's too good why not lock the special ammo behind the dozer upgrade ?


+1

You could also make upgrading to the bulldozer blade/ WP shell package lock out regular HE shells. This would kinda make sense if the crews had to unload all of their HE shells to make room for the WP shells.

This could be done a few ways. You either leave the ability as a pay to shoot like it is now, and HE shells are simply locked out, or you make the load WP shells replace the HE shells in the toggle ability. You could reduce the rate of fire but give it high accuracy to the WP shells if you make them replace the HE shells so you don’t just spray WP everywhere. I like the idea of the WP being a slow but accurate auto fire that replaces HE shells. It would be hectic and confusing in tank fights too if you left it on WP so your Sherman is randomly putting WP shells into a charging Panther, doing no damage but messing up everyone’s visibility, friend and foe alike! Lol

Either way, by preventing the Sherman from shooting WP and then following up with HE shells you reduce its ability to wipe AT guns by itself, but it would still be very powerful when used in conjunction with infantry, mortars or another Sherman that doesn’t have the bulldozer upgrade.
26 Jun 2019, 19:15 PM
#28
avatar of RollingStone

Posts: 173

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 12:58 PMKatitof


So, I was right after all, you were not aware of them.


Next time, pls, clarify that you meant two of 12 infantry units of OKW that have Blenderkopfer nades. Because "infantry" have quite large meaning.

Noone actually uses them, AFAIK - mostly because they are locked behind 2 most expensice squads in whole army composition. Same stuff that now assault tommies have.

However, tommies are mainlane infantry, not some elite of arian race, and that might lead to some problems.

And, same ability also located in UKF - AFAIK, Comet can shoot WP shells at vet1. Again, almost noone really uses it, at least i've never seen that one, and again, because it is locked to one of most expencive unit in whole army.

And now, the main, universal and rather cheapish USF tank have those shells. Same sutiation as with ass.tommies.
26 Jun 2019, 19:25 PM
#29
avatar of Neneko007

Posts: 13

Its not like any other tank besides the pz4 and stug have any respect for allies AT guns. Shot bounce like the of there is no tommorow.
26 Jun 2019, 19:26 PM
#30
avatar of Balanced_Gamer

Posts: 783

I think this new USF commander is pretty good.

The Riflenade for Echelons makes it a real lethal unit. It is like a free nade toss every 5 seconds. Really pushes the enemy to move a lot out of cover. Quite annoying I would say. I think it be great if it were a default option and if it were accessible across other factions also! Increase diversity and to some extent, increase micro intensity across all factions! Can be a game changer!


The Sherman upgrade is cool making it very deadly and somewhat a better choice than Jackson in most situations. Since it has improved armour when upgraded, extra health making it a 5 shot instead and it has extra utility. Enhanced Anti Infantry capabilities with Phosphorous shot. Makes it one of the best upgrades you can get for mediums. In fact becomes the best medium in game in my opinion once upgraded.

Other things also.

I feel overall this commander is somewhat balanced, although the riflenades can be devastating and very effective in many situations, much more devastating than a flamethrower due to its overall effectiveness.

It has a lot of utility that comes in real handy, making infantry do overall better as well as Sherman capabilities.

It is like a package that makes USF overall stronger. Strengthen Echelon, Shermans and Riflemen. It is really a useful commander. Mobile Arty as a package included which fulfills their wishes! Everything the USF needs to be made "great again".
26 Jun 2019, 20:21 PM
#31
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 10:24 AMLago


They're really not.


White Phosphorous shells are insanely good: before this you only got them on a Comet.

Giving them to the Sherman, a unit that already has the excellent HE rounds, turns it into a superlative anti-tank gun killer.

Throw in the armour upgrade and it also gains the edge over medium tanks: you've made is about as tough as an Easy Eight.

+1

Except doesn't bulldozer upgrade only give extra health, not armor too?

I'd rather see like a WP barrage for the mortar instead of the sherman if it gets replaced with anything at all.
26 Jun 2019, 20:25 PM
#32
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


+1

Except doesn't bulldozer upgrade only give extra health, not armor too?

I'd rather see like a WP barrage for the mortar instead of the sherman if it gets replaced with anything at all.

Its health and armor, you have it in the patch notes.
ddd
26 Jun 2019, 20:32 PM
#33
avatar of ddd

Posts: 528 | Subs: 1

I predicted it in the usf commander suggestions thread:

WP shells on HE Sherman and sprinting Rangers too strong - Gets nerfed fast - Joins NKVD in Premium Tier Commanders List

If you listened to all these people that wanted to see Easy8 here and told you sprinting Rangers is not a good idea there wouldnt be a problem.

26 Jun 2019, 20:39 PM
#34
avatar of Jae For Jett
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post26 Jun 2019, 20:32 PMddd

If you listened to all these people that wanted to see Easy8 here and told you sprinting Rangers is not a good idea there wouldnt be a problem.


What you probably mean is that there would be a different post about how we made rifle company even more useless (while also making the new commander itself useless) and how if we didnt put the ez8 in then there wouldnt be a problem.
ddd
26 Jun 2019, 20:57 PM
#35
avatar of ddd

Posts: 528 | Subs: 1


What you probably mean is that there would be a different post about how we made rifle company even more useless (while also making the new commander itself useless) and how if we didnt put the ez8 in then there wouldnt be a problem.


How would i complain about easy8 when i was one of the people suggesting it?

And how would it make rifle company useless assuming you wouldnt change one thing about this commander?

And final question, do you really think rifle company is useful in its current state?
26 Jun 2019, 21:14 PM
#36
avatar of murky depths

Posts: 607

Obviously he means other people would complain.

No matter what happens, no matter what gets buffed or nerfed or changed or added or cut, people will complain. If not you, then someone else.
ddd
26 Jun 2019, 21:35 PM
#37
avatar of ddd

Posts: 528 | Subs: 1

Obviously he means other people would complain.

No matter what happens, no matter what gets buffed or nerfed or changed or added or cut, people will complain. If not you, then someone else.


Obviously few people who come to usf threads only to troll around and say that everything remotely good "would cause issues" will complain no matter what but you can just ignore them.

There were bunch of people in suggestions thread and on reddit saying they would like to see easy8 because its forghotten unit in shitty doc. Easy8 + WP shell would be as "overpowered" as Comet.

On the other hand, did anyone really think that HE Sherman needs better anti infantry capabilities of all things?
27 Jun 2019, 15:03 PM
#38
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

WP shells are ultimate FU only to mindless blobbers and pak wall enthusiasts
Though they are obviously too powerful to give them to plain Shermans, they would've been fine on E8, would've also fit better since Rifle Company has WP offmap
27 Jun 2019, 15:11 PM
#39
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

I'm still thinking that giving them a meatshield tank in the form of the Jumbo would be a better alternative than cheap and borderline OP gimmicks for the regular Sherman but that's just me I guess.
27 Jun 2019, 15:51 PM
#40
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

I'm still thinking that giving them a meatshield tank in the form of the Jumbo would be a better alternative than cheap and borderline OP gimmicks for the regular Sherman but that's just me I guess.


USF does need a meatshield tank. The only problem with your suggestion is that there isn't a model for the Jumbo, unless Relic would be willing to use the model for the Easy 8 as the model for the Jumbo. I'd be happy with even a non-doctrinal Easy 8 (make it a side upgrade on Tier 3). If that happened, Rifle Company could replace the Easy 8 with the Pershing which would help that commander greatly.
0 user is browsing this thread:

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Rosbone: I would like to join in celebration with the 9% of Coh3 MP players who are getting ALL of the new maps. Woohoo! #3Tards
Last Friday, 19:22 PM
OKSpitfire: I hope that at least one of heavies is a like-for-like reskin of the coh 2 ISU-152. I miss that thing.
Last Friday, 10:23 AM
Rosbone: Buy our cool new large tanks that will never get played on the 4 new 1v1 maps added. Perfect synergy! :facepalm:
Last Thursday, 19:23 PM
Rosbone: Everyone ready for some deep penetration :snfPeter:
Last Thursday, 17:13 PM
Lady Xenarra: I'm sure the ppl who defended it as balanced for Allies will be screaming like they got scaled with boiling water, in COH3. How the tables turn.
Last Thursday, 11:33 AM
Willy Pete: I think it was nuts with any engine damage. Especially on superheavies
Last Thursday, 07:03 AM
aerafield: Personally I think without the ram ability, it's worse than loiters for example
Last Thursday, 00:09 AM
Willy Pete: It combined well with most slowing abilities, not just ram stuns
Last Wednesday, 23:36 PM
Willy Pete: Only??? I think not being able to shoot it down and the ramp up effect also had something to do with it
Last Wednesday, 23:34 PM
Willy Pete: Really
Last Wednesday, 23:30 PM
aerafield: AT overwatch was broken only because it came with the faction of T34 ramming
Last Wednesday, 22:29 PM
Willy Pete: Love to see Relic really learning from their past mistakes. Let's bring back the dumbest ability in coh2, and charge money for it
Last Wednesday, 20:34 PM
Willy Pete: New DAK commander will have AT overwatch as alternate choice to elefant
Last Wednesday, 20:33 PM
aaa: Funy thing new players dont know that. And are trying to compete vs hacks
Last Wednesday, 10:33 AM
aaa: Online gaming is trash in general, not just coh. On high level there are all cheats in most games
Last Wednesday, 10:24 AM
aaa: 2 cheaters in 3 days. MH and DH
Last Wednesday, 09:57 AM
aerafield: I am a simple man, I build Humvees with Pathfinders and Missile Launchers inside, I am happy
Last Tuesday, 20:57 PM
Lady Xenarra: aerafield lamevee spammer confirmed :nahnah:
Last Tuesday, 20:42 PM
aerafield: those who know, know: https://www.reddit.com/r/CompanyOfHeroes/s/fPk4yLIgmK
Last Tuesday, 15:40 PM
adamírcz: Might be onto somethin here, combine side armour existing, maps where flanking is a viable option, and hopefully also heavies actually being less manouverable than mediums (lookin at you coh2), and it might be fun gameplay
Last Monday, 13:39 PM
Willy Pete: Shouldn't coh3 heavies actually have insane front armor values? The glory days of 400+ Kt armor wouldn't be as bad when side armor is a thing. Not to say its a good idea lol
14 Feb 2025, 23:14 PM
aerafield: But then again, maybe CoH3 superheavies should actually have insane armor values because the whole game is designed for the clumsy & inept anyway :snfPeter:
14 Feb 2025, 23:04 PM
aerafield: It's like you have to coordinate an entire orchestra of abilities and the correct units, meanwhile your opponent just clicks his 1 superheavy tank occasionally...
14 Feb 2025, 23:01 PM
aerafield: the giga frontal armor also made these units too oppressive in average or low ELO games
14 Feb 2025, 22:59 PM
aerafield: Massive HP pool but reasonable amount of armor is way healthier design
14 Feb 2025, 22:57 PM
aerafield: Say what you want, but the titanium frontal armor design of coh2 superheavies was bullshit. Too many bad players not getting punished for their bad micro because penetration RNG carries them
14 Feb 2025, 22:57 PM
Willy Pete: Also the attack ground with the pak40 looked perfect, that Pershing should be dead
14 Feb 2025, 19:18 PM
Willy Pete: Ahh just saw the other one that died. Some bad rng I think but there was an AT gun at med range for a chunk of that fight
14 Feb 2025, 19:14 PM
Willy Pete: Which KT? I saw one got almost deleted but it also showed its side to a hellcat AND the m5. I think the player even admitted he got lucky
14 Feb 2025, 19:10 PM
Lady Xenarra: I understand that the devs want to sell the Allied part of the DLC, but the KT got swiss cheesed like a COH2 bunker on treads :S
14 Feb 2025, 15:16 PM
SupremeStefan: They should make dlc separataly for axis and alies
14 Feb 2025, 10:28 AM
SupremeStefan: 25$ is actually a ok price for 40 abilites = 8 commanders = 4 battlegroups. But problem is that it comes in bundle
14 Feb 2025, 10:24 AM
Willy Pete: Have they shown the actual trees yet for the new commanders? Skimmed through the deep dive today, didnt see em
13 Feb 2025, 22:29 PM
Rosbone: Big Tonk boners incoming :hansGASM:
13 Feb 2025, 17:38 PM
donofsandiego: Probably not
12 Feb 2025, 14:57 PM
Lone-Wolf: Hi guys. Error code -4. Any fixes?
08 Feb 2025, 17:09 PM
donofsandiego: Probably not
07 Feb 2025, 16:57 PM
SkYisTheLimiT_CoH: any coh2.org admin there ?
07 Feb 2025, 12:43 PM
Lady Xenarra: Ever the contrarian, aerafield.
07 Feb 2025, 11:59 AM
aerafield: I havent seen the new units in action yet (whose BGs will not be purchased by too many people as they are pretty expensive I recon), but I can say with 100% confidence that the Pershing needs a buff
07 Feb 2025, 02:31 AM
Lady Xenarra: I would think lots more players would come/return since there's so many iconic units being added in the new BGs. I just don't want to hear another 8+ yrs of Pershing need buff complaints
06 Feb 2025, 23:22 PM
adamírcz: If I had my supply of copium, Id say they might at least get enough money to not have to wait 5 months with problems that should be a matter of bi-weekly hotfix
06 Feb 2025, 23:10 PM
adamírcz: I mean, its overpriced,
06 Feb 2025, 23:10 PM
Rosbone: Will it help or hurt the current player base is the real question. Should add more players, but may drive many away.
06 Feb 2025, 19:17 PM
Rosbone: Yes you too can play with a persdhing for the low price of $24.99 USD. Or be the poor schlub who gets his rectum reconfigured who doesnt have the latest pay to win stuffs.
06 Feb 2025, 19:16 PM
donofsandiego: persdhing in coh 3? 😳
06 Feb 2025, 18:42 PM
Rosbone: @aerafield Ahhh, I think I made a pershing like twice in my life since that commander is pretty bad in 4s.
05 Feb 2025, 23:20 PM
aerafield: @Rosbone coh2 pershing has the same ability so, whatever. Though it's probably gonna be a 30 seconds ability to make it super broken pay to win, then 2 months later it will get "hotfixed" into a skillshot like coh2 pershing
05 Feb 2025, 22:00 PM
Rosbone: How do we feel about Pershing shooting thru multiple buildings?
05 Feb 2025, 19:43 PM
Rosbone: I am just happy Relic was smart enough to put this out now because the community was falling asleep waiting 3 months between patches. And a new/old map was shown :banana:
05 Feb 2025, 19:38 PM
aerafield: Not even the trailer can hide the trash sound effects
05 Feb 2025, 18:46 PM
Lady Xenarra: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSvwH2mXje8 Well this should result in 'interesting' reactions... :rofl:
05 Feb 2025, 18:43 PM
Ginaaa: how do i send replay to get him banned?
05 Feb 2025, 00:11 AM
Ginaaa: `just caught cooper47/ maphacking
05 Feb 2025, 00:11 AM
adamírcz: Oh well, I might look it up on dickcord and try upload anyway
02 Feb 2025, 00:27 AM
adamírcz: shiit, saw clean through me
02 Feb 2025, 00:26 AM
aerafield: That's exactly what a drophacker would say
01 Feb 2025, 22:37 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

705 users are online: 705 guests
0 post in the last 24h
2 posts in the last week
42 posts in the last month
Registered members: 51909
Welcome our newest member, jarzambb13
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM