Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Not really.
Their DPS improvement over con mosins is minimal.
~0.4 DPS at all ranges.
You really believe an "improvement" of 1.2 DPS would make a difference?
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Just mentioning this, the M5 halftruck can only take one 7 man conscript squad and nothing else (not even a different squad).
Also, the wehrmacht expert AI ( prob check others too) is messed up. They seem to be stuck in a endless loop of spamming pioneers and mgs.
Posts: 5279
Just mentioning this, the M5 halftruck can only take one 7 man conscript squad and nothing else (not even a different squad).
Also, the wehrmacht expert AI ( prob check others too) is messed up. They seem to be stuck in a endless loop of spamming pioneers and mgs.
Posts: 4474
kat i didn't think u would fall so low as AAA and fake stats, i thought u were a man with standards
Not really.
Their DPS improvement over con mosins is minimal.
~0.4 DPS at all ranges.
You really believe an "improvement" of 1.2 DPS would make a difference?
Katitof-2018
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 3260
kat i didn't think u would fall so low as AAA and fake stats, i thought u were a man with standards
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
kat i didn't think u would fall so low as AAA and fake stats, i thought u were a man with standards
He means 0.4 as +40%, which is roughly correct.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
He means 0.4 as +40%, which is roughly correct.
Posts: 4474
would it be better as it give them more damage were they are supposed to be good and even give them better moving accuracy ?
Not faking, having too many tabs opened.
Had SVT vs guard mosins opened rigtht next to con mosin vs guard mosin.
Add 2 and 2 together for the rest of the story.
I've said 0.4 dps, which is accurate at long range, at cqc its bit more, but if you compare it with current cover bonus, its roughly the same at close range and less half of the bonus at long range(ignoring 7th model base dps).
Katitof-2018
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
would it be better as it give them more damage were they are supposed to be good and even give them better moving accuracy ?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4474
yea but the road seems closed that's why i opted for guard mossin
You could argue about that, but there would be problems with transparency on which model is using what, cons swapping mosins for mosins or inconsistently losing dps.
Again, if weapon upgrade was to be the way, I'd go with SVTs which solves all of the above.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
yea but the road seems closed that's why i opted for guard mossin
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 573
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 607
Yes it is, my bad. The cover bonusses do apply there, I thought you were talking about the next test with the Panzergrenadiers closing in to within the 10 range threshold.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Penal had their DPS increased to be used more often and it lead to chain reaction increasing the DPs of Guards, then shock and now Conscripts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Well, that's actually wrong.
Guards were not "buffed" overall. They just overnerfed them and then they rectified and the end product remains an inferior unit but "balanced" considering the changes in the overall game. We have already gone through this but for others:
Shocks were not bad because of Penals. Shocks were "average" at best after WFA were released (seeing use only mostly when KV8 was OP) and not worthy after OKW rework.
Finally, the funny thing is that Penals saw no use for years, because they actually made them Riflemen for Soviets. Original design was 6 man G43 squad with the same premium cost as PG.
Conscripts: as i said before, i just hope that the cover bonus is just slight over the top for people to actually try it. This is just a common practice when you implement a new feature.
4 Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
 |
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
|
27 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
153 | ||
|
|
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
