2 
Posts: 1108
PPSH upgrade should be non-doctrinal which must be unlocked from hq and then purchased for each conscript (3x ppsh).
At nades and molotovs should be merged as a single unlock but at a higher cost. If they are to remain separate however, then either molotovs must be buffed or their unlock cost must be reduced.
Other than this I would say conscripts are fine since they have good utility and low reinforce costs.
 | Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 212
This is the best solution by far!
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Conscript merge would function a whole lot better if it reduced the squad to 1 man instead of completely removing the squad.
AT nades and Molotov upgrade. 
Posts: 766 | Subs: 2
Posts: 15
Permanently BannedI would say adjust their rifles first so they actually consistently deal damage and then possibly adjust the upgrades revolving around Conscripts, then work from there.That is lots of buffs, and you still say "then work from there".
Posts: 2742
QOL:
Balance
-Merge
Idea i can get behind without much complain or foreseeing issues. This also opens up a slot in case an upgrade wants to be implemented on HQ.
What we all should have in mind, is not making Volks STG44 2.0 with conscripts.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 766 | Subs: 2
Posts: 525
- make 3х PPSh non doctrinal
- make 3x SVT-40 in the doctrine
- unite Molotov (better to replace it with a normal grenade) with an anti-tank grenade
- remove the throw delay
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Instead of buffing the Molotov. The Molotov is cheap and actually quite good for its cost. Why not nerf its counter part, the volks incendiary grenade, by adding a 1.5 second timer like other grenades?
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Instead of buffing the Molotov. The Molotov is cheap and actually quite good for its cost. Why not nerf its counter part, the volks incendiary grenade, by adding a 1.5 second timer like other grenades?
Posts: 2742
Posts: 4928
The problem I've always seen with the volks incin nade aside from its cost is the fact that you run up to a garrison and throw the nade and force the squad out. If this squad happens to be 2x BAR rifles or 2x Bren tommies congratulations you just denied their cover but now they're ontop of you with higher DPS meaning you lost 35 munis AND have to retreat and probably lose a model. I wasn't around when volks had the model 24 frag grenade but I honestly don't see a problem with it in my head. If someone could enlighten me with that that'd be great.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 766 | Subs: 2
The volks nade is already twice the cost and is the only non-doc way to deal with garrisoned units or emplacements. Why does the volks nade need a nerf?
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
I'll start by saying I hate the flame grenade because it's ahistoric and complete fiction in an otherwise generally authentic game. Anyway the problem with the fragmentation grenade was that it was the only anti-building weapon OKW had at the start of the game, and didn't actually deny the building. If the other player was paying attention, he would just exit the building on the other side, let the grenade explode, then immediately go back inside. Now you're out 35 Munitions and you didn't do anything at all, he still has the building. They added the flame effects so that the other person could not simply re-enter the building, they would have to give the building up.
Posts: 212
I'll start by saying I hate the flame grenade because it's ahistoric and complete fiction in an otherwise generally authentic game. Anyway the problem with the fragmentation grenade was that it was the only anti-building weapon OKW had at the start of the game, and didn't actually deny the building. If the other player was paying attention, he would just exit the building on the other side, let the grenade explode, then immediately go back inside. Now you're out 35 Munitions and you didn't do anything at all, he still has the building. They added the flame effects so that the other person could not simply re-enter the building, they would have to give the building up.
Posts: 236
Posts: 578
Only thing I'd do is reduce reinforcement cost, cons shouldn't be the heavy DPS unit like double BAR rifles or STG volks.
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
)
 |
|
|
331 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
