Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » M-42 vs other light AT.

M-42 vs other light AT.

PAGES (4)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
Firesparks
16 Mar 2016, 21:44 PM
#61
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 19:26 PMStark
leave mg42 alone, it's fine.

#adapt


#readthethread

maybe try the m-42 to be more similar to the raketenwerfer? decrease tha atg's range in exchange for actual useful penetration, damage, and cloak.


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Stug life
16 Mar 2016, 23:36 PM
#62
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

To everyone that's is replying to stark if you read carefully you can se he written MG42 no m42 he is talking about the ostheer mg that is fine as it is
(Buy new glasses)
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Selvy289
16 Mar 2016, 23:47 PM
#63
avatar of Selvy289

Posts: 366

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 23:36 PMStug life
To everyone that's is replying to stark if you read carefully you can se he written MG42 no m42 he is talking about the ostheer mg that is fine as it is
(Buy new glasses)


Probably dosnt know that the M-42 exists lol.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Kharn
17 Mar 2016, 00:56 AM
#64
avatar of Kharn

Posts: 264

Should be able to swap between HE and AP rounds on the M-42 maybe to make it a bit more interesting.

Men of War all AT guns can kill infantry w/ HE shells but in Coh2 it seems they only wish to fight tanks.. so strange.
Axis biased, Allied biased. Play every faction before you scream nerf, be a Coh2 player not an "Axis" or "Allied" player.

Playercard: 76561198006693960
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
NinjaWJ
17 Mar 2016, 01:31 AM
#65
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070

Yeah M42 needs a place in the game
jump backJump back to quoted post31 Mar 2015, 15:19 PMAlexzandvar
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Sandblastednut
17 Mar 2016, 02:19 AM
#66
avatar of Sandblastednut

Posts: 21

The small AT gun was ok when it had more of a chance to snipe men. Use to use two together supporting cons.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
nee
17 Mar 2016, 03:36 AM
#67
avatar of nee

Posts: 1216

Give it Canister shells at vet1 (copy from Greyhound), and/or give it Treadshot or Aimed Shot (copy from AEC/ OKW Puma)

At least then, it's still no killer but it's great way to complement your other units.

Also WTF is it with people demanding a 100mm Soviet unit?
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
thedarkarmadillo
17 Mar 2016, 04:24 AM
#68
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Mar 2016, 03:36 AMnee
Give it Canister shells at vet1 (copy from Greyhound), and/or give it Treadshot or Aimed Shot (copy from AEC/ OKW Puma)

At least then, it's still no killer but it's great way to complement your other units.

Also WTF is it with people demanding a 100mm Soviet unit?

Its the dream of AT hith higher pen than 200... Although knowing relic it would have 200 pen but have twice the ROF as the su85!
#stalinwept
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Adviser
17 Mar 2016, 05:20 AM
#69
avatar of Adviser

Posts: 53

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 19:13 PMpoop


How the hell do shreks and raks have more pen than an ATgun? The 34/76?

What are you talking about? Why you wrote this to me? Isn’t soviet m42 suppose to be AT gun too? Now it barely worse than 2 PTRS.:snfPeter:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
TAKTCOM
17 Mar 2016, 06:18 AM
#70
avatar of TAKTCOM

Posts: 275 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 18:17 PMMyself
I find it rather amusing, that people who constantly have repeated that history does not apply to coh2 not even slightly would make historic arguments themselves.

For example where?
jump backJump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 18:47 PMvasa1719
guys here write so many ideas, but Relic ResidentSleeper.

Really there are so many options.
First, position. Like T0-T1 undoc M-42 will be fine vs cubels, armor car and halftrack. Yeah M-42 can't kill anything exept bunker (if german palyer not sleep) but it can drive away fast armor. And that's enough.
Second, abilites. I see 2 ways. One is increase efficiency like AT-gun, second is increase efficiency like field gun. AT role of AI role. Increase price if at needet.
1) AT: Take Aim, HVAP shell, Target Weak Point, Aimed Shot or Treadshot. Anything from this list at first vet will make M-42 better. Buff pen at least to PTRS level.
2) AI: canister shot, AT/HE toggle or profile T-70 gun with reduced RoF.
You see? We can do a lot interesting things here. But one problem - who will deal with this? LoLiks? HA.HA.HA. Well, again, I spend time on something that will never happen:guyokay:
jump backJump back to quoted post17 Mar 2016, 03:36 AMnee
Also WTF is it with people demanding a 100mm Soviet unit?

And what is wrong with soviet analogue PAK43?o_O
Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Myself
17 Mar 2016, 08:49 AM
#71
avatar of Myself

Posts: 677

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Mar 2016, 06:18 AMTAKTCOM

For example where?

They know who the are, they tell other of when they use historic arguments but they use themselves when it suit them...
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
TAKTCOM
17 Mar 2016, 09:06 AM
#72
avatar of TAKTCOM

Posts: 275 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Mar 2016, 08:49 AMMyself

They know who the are, they tell other of when they use historic arguments but they use themselves when it suit them...

I don't see "historic arguments" in this topic.
Victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
thedarkarmadillo
17 Mar 2016, 14:48 PM
#73
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Mar 2016, 08:49 AMMyself

They know who the are, they tell other of when they use historic arguments but they use themselves when it suit them...

He didnt use history as a basis for balance, he had a quick blurb about partisans, there was no "and so the tiger should have more armour and have 90 range cause it was a beast irl" it was straight up "this is cool"
#stalinwept
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
vietnamabc
17 Mar 2016, 17:43 PM
#74
avatar of vietnamabc

Posts: 1063

M-42 is crap since release, pure light AT is just not worth it in this game, all other light AT has scaling till late game:
_Puma got lol coaxial MG and OP vet
_Guards has button and being decent AT,
_PTRS cons for a time is mainly used for AI and after PTRS nerf nobody bother with that commander anymore,
_Pre-buff SU-76 and AEC is total shite too
_USF 57mm is barely usable even with vet + AP round
So no unless it give me something for late game than I'll stick with my trusty Zis.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (4)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » M-42 vs other light AT.

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1235
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

837 users are online: 837 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49113
Welcome our newest member, Dedek545
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM