|
I just dont see a reason to ever build cons, other than feeding the enemy free vet.
outside of 1 or 2 for snares, I wouldnt spend a single fuel/pop on them that I diddnt absolutely have to. Giving them more models just means more vet for the enemy while the cons continue to not do very much.
Penal spam shall continue. |
the current meta of allies spamming TDs and Axis spamming panthers (this is in team games).
.
Current meta?
It's been the only meta in this game for yeeeaaaars. |
|
(kinda off-topic)
DAE think that 34/85s should be non-doctrinal?
It really isnt better than most other mediums, and would really help out Sov commanders (like the new one) who have very little options for late game. |
|
SVT drop is a complete waste of munitions.
do something else.
It is a pathetic dps upgrade to an already useless unit (conscripts), does nothing for penals or guards, and a downgrade to shock troops.
It's most effective use is to troll enemies into picking up useless weapons. |
|
Just make cons cheaper.
Other infantry is twice as good for 30% extra cost, with better side-tech and supporting weapons.
cons dont scale for shit, if they are going to refuse buffing them after all these years, just make them cheaper so we can spam the fuck out of em.
I don't know about other people, but I have pretty much stopped even building cons quite a while ago outside of a token snare unit.
The SVT drop in the new commander is a such a marginal upgrade for cons, I wouldn't ever recommend using it, and it's a straight downgrade to everything else, so whats the point. Complete waste of muni. |
Not a fan of the soviet rocket strike, or the vehicles for the British.
- The rockets are too unreliable, too easy to dodge, thus do to little reliable effect for the cost. The only reliable way to use em is to sac a T-34.
Wasnt there an unused ability that called in 2 cheap weaker T-34s? Maybe throw that in there so we have some ramming fodder to pair with it, rather than killing off their best non-TDs, which are in rough enough shape to begin with.
- The M5... Im just not seeing a use for them to be honest. For an AEC alternate, the Stuart would be much more fitting. I've never actually had one be any more effective than their T1 cart with a vickers/wasp, which you can get cheaper and earlier without tech. Maybe I'm just using them wrong.
The M10 is ok, but I just have a hard time choosing it over a cromwell or just waiting a little more for a firefly. I dont think British really need more T3 tank options, as they have pelenty out-of-the-box. I'd rather borrow an ability like assault, smoke raid, or the 4cp HQ-25pnder strike... or really any mid-early ability to force a choice of munition spending between it and the smg packages.
Have not tried the others yet.
|
|
All axis have FREE AT snare on all mainline infantry.
All axis have Non-doc access to handheld AT
The t70 has less health than a 222
Try again. |
VG's need a buff . their weapon upgrade is extremely lackluster and their vet is generally poor. the mp44 upgrade should at least mirror the dps output of the pg's and vet 3 should be increased from 10% to 23%
they are the 2nd cheapest inf unit in the game barely in front of conscripts... they do NOT need more buffs. |
|
oh look, another tard who cant win by spamming shrek blobs..
never mind that the OKW blob is actually more potent than ever. |
Provided you sit still in order to actually have good accuracy.
Implying the IS-2 is any more accurate on the move..
Wehraboo harder fanboy. |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
