Posts: 2561
Because the fact that it might miss doesn't take away from the fact that it can attempt in the first place. It can survive attempts that would kill the vast majority of allied tanks and reach further then them as well. Not to mention DPS doesn't matter as much if you are chasing already damaged tanks.
explain how a tank that always misses and shoots slow like a turtle is good at diving?
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2561
Doesn't Panther 1v1s any Allied medium tank destroyer?Yes, the panther will beat every allied tank head-on except the IS-2.
Posts: 1217
Posts: 207
Yes, the panther will beat every allied tank head-on except the IS-2.
Posts: 2561
Am I the only one who thinks a tank whose weakness is low rear armor and that is supposed to dive into enemy lines (as in exposing your rear) is one big contradiction? If you use it as it´s supposed to be used you are at the same time risking to lose the unit.Diving is always risky, panther is just less risky then the other tanks. You think it's any easier for tanks that have low frontal AND rear armor?
The diving tank concept as some want to depict the Panther does not work versus competent players. And in my opinion that´s why the Panther is so unsatisfactory to use.
Posts: 174
Provided you sit still in order to actually have good accuracy.
Posts: 851 | Subs: 1
Am I the only one who thinks a tank whose weakness is low rear armor and that is supposed to dive into enemy lines (as in exposing your rear) is one big contradiction? If you use it as it´s supposed to be used you are at the same time risking to lose the unit.
The diving tank concept as some want to depict the Panther does not work versus competent players. And in my opinion that´s why the Panther is so unsatisfactory to use.
Posts: 738
It´s good for nothing. Can´t tank since it has a mediums health pool, can´t be spammed since it´s one of the most expensive units in the game, can´t outrange a lot of units and can´t even out-dps a fucking Panzer IV.
Don´t build it.
The only-allied expert team is coming for you though since you proposed a buff to a German tank. Pretty tired of arguing against them again. Have fun.
Posts: 1930
Posts: 207
Implying the IS-2 is any more accurate on the move..
Wehraboo harder fanboy.
Posts: 738
The IS 2 is a heavy tank that fires explosive shells that wreck infantry so if its accuracy was great on the move it could wipe squads like crazy (especially 4 man squads) while the panther is a medium who's shells have virtually no AOE and and its role on the battlefield is much more dedicated to TD rather than AI
Posts: 4474
fixed for you
Panther MG's do good damage to infantry, it's not like Firefly/Jackson/SU-85 TD's that can't kill infantry at all .
Panther is a hybrid role like the comet, but it does the AT role better with almost no AI.
Katitof-2018
Posts: 738
Your text.. fixed for you
Posts: 4474
this meme has been debunked for a while
Now in the humble words of James Vardy
Katitof-2018
Posts: 738
Posts: 207
Aha it was already post by smith another video where unit are in cover guess who wiped the squad and guess who killed no one?
( now stop being bias and post the other video )
Posts: 4474
ok fan boy time to call mr.smith
aha yes you're right, the Comet shells will get stuck on map elevation half the time so they won't kill anything unlike the Panther MG's
Katitof-2018
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
And also lets just forget that the panther needs a munitions investment to get that AI with the pintle while the comet needs no such upgrade and that the panther is more expensive and that its riskier to move close with a panther because it is more expensive.
Posts: 738
 |
|
|
75 | ||
 |
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
38 | ||
|
|
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
28 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
595 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
