Just give 222 suppression with upgrade
Posts: 1439
Posts: 366
Bad idea.
or smoke with vet1 as other light vehicles
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedPosts: 935
Posts: 183
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Huge nope.
Posts: 2470
Posts: 4928
Give suppression to a more heavily armoured, faster and more agile scout vehicle with more vision than the Kubel? Is it that you have so much trouble early game that you want both axis sides to have mobile suppression, learn to micro your mg42.
We already did that though?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
We already did that though?
Sure, lets make 222 cost 65 fuel and need to be stationary to shoot 20mm gun and only with rear armor exposed. Hell it could even get 120 more health.
Why not, lets see how appealing it will be.
(translation to slow people: bad idea)
Posts: 74
We already did that though?
Do Allies have schreks, Puma or Pak 40? AAHT take more fuel to unlock than a 222, plus it have less vision(35) than Kubel(50) or 222(50+) afaik
Posts: 183
We already did that though?
Yeah and which factions have access to handheld AT that will destroy that AA truck in 3 hits? Which comes first? Which cost more fuel? Why would you want 2 cheap options?
Allies have anti-infantry vehicles that take a lot of damage from ubiquitous volks and the odd pgren. What do the axis equivalent have to fear? PTRS? Bazooka?
Posts: 431 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1439
We already did that though?
Are you comparing 222 scout car to Soviet AA half truck? Because if you do you should be compering it to USF and OKW half trucks.
Posts: 186
Are you comparing 222 scout car to Soviet AA half truck? Because if you do you should be compering it to USF and OKW half trucks.
Pretty sure the picture is the USF halftrack.
That aside, giving 222 suppression would be pretty op.
Less scatter at long range while stationary would be acceptable imo.
Posts: 4928
Are you comparing 222 scout car to Soviet AA half truck? Because if you do you should be compering it to USF and OKW half trucks.
USF AA Half-Track. Early game mobile suppression, anti-infantry, and anti-vehicle.
Posts: 74
USF AA Half-Track. Early game mobile suppression, anti-infantry, and anti-vehicle.
Against much more effective/early arriving(compared to US Stuart/AT guns in a typical BO) vehicle counter that Axis have: Schreks, Puma, Pak40,teller. 222 also have much more sight(50) than AAHT(35),thus making it even harder to flank/disable with infantry AT snare.
Posts: 1439
USF AA Half-Track. Early game mobile suppression, anti-infantry, and anti-vehicle.
Still, you're comparing scout car to a Half truck. Compare 222 with Dodge, M20 or Soviet M3A.
Also analyse at what point USF appears in the game, its role and what are the counters available at this time.
Posts: 935
Posts: 935
Compare 222 with Dodge, M20 or Soviet M3A.
Mu ha ha ha
We would never seen Soviet snipers in the begining or such PUSSHING with US infantry. If u give it in thier 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Mu ha ha ha
We would never seen Soviet snipers in the begining or such PUSSHING with US infantry. If u give it in thier 1
If that T1 would cost 50 fuel and you started with 10-15 maybe.
Livestreams
45 | |||||
42 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.620222.736+5
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.919405.694+3
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, igryskoj24
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM