Login

russian armor

Just give 222 suppression with upgrade

29 Nov 2014, 13:15 PM
#1
29 Nov 2014, 13:55 PM
#2
avatar of Smaug

Posts: 366

Bad idea.

or smoke with vet1 as other light vehicles
29 Nov 2014, 13:58 PM
#3
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
And fau rockets:p
29 Nov 2014, 14:10 PM
#4
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

222 has super "thick" armor so US and Sov horde just run to it. It could've stoped at least SOME of them.
29 Nov 2014, 14:26 PM
#5
avatar of The Silver Sage

Posts: 183

Give suppression to a more heavily armoured, faster and more agile scout vehicle with more vision than the Kubel? Is it that you have so much trouble early game that you want both axis sides to have mobile suppression, learn to micro your mg42.
29 Nov 2014, 14:31 PM
#6
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

I'm confused. If anyone is wondering, comment #4 is the OP.

Huge nope.
29 Nov 2014, 15:16 PM
#7
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

yeah no, it'd just be a better version of the kubel.
29 Nov 2014, 21:24 PM
#8
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Give suppression to a more heavily armoured, faster and more agile scout vehicle with more vision than the Kubel? Is it that you have so much trouble early game that you want both axis sides to have mobile suppression, learn to micro your mg42.


We already did that though?

29 Nov 2014, 21:55 PM
#9
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



We already did that though?



Sure, lets make 222 cost 65 fuel and need to be stationary to shoot 20mm gun and only with rear armor exposed. Hell it could even get 120 more health.

Why not, lets see how appealing it will be.

(translation to slow people: bad idea)
29 Nov 2014, 21:59 PM
#10
avatar of Doomgunner

Posts: 74



We already did that though?



Do Allies have schreks, Puma or Pak 40? AAHT take more fuel to unlock than a 222, plus it have less vision(35) than Kubel(50) or 222(50+) afaik
29 Nov 2014, 22:58 PM
#11
avatar of The Silver Sage

Posts: 183



We already did that though?



Yeah and which factions have access to handheld AT that will destroy that AA truck in 3 hits? Which comes first? Which cost more fuel? Why would you want 2 cheap options?

Allies have anti-infantry vehicles that take a lot of damage from ubiquitous volks and the odd pgren. What do the axis equivalent have to fear? PTRS? Bazooka?
29 Nov 2014, 23:50 PM
#12
avatar of VIPUKS

Posts: 431 | Subs: 1

30 Nov 2014, 09:58 AM
#13
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439



We already did that though?




Are you comparing 222 scout car to Soviet AA half truck? Because if you do you should be compering it to USF and OKW half trucks.
30 Nov 2014, 10:08 AM
#14
avatar of Rupert

Posts: 186




Are you comparing 222 scout car to Soviet AA half truck? Because if you do you should be compering it to USF and OKW half trucks.


Pretty sure the picture is the USF halftrack.

That aside, giving 222 suppression would be pretty op.

Less scatter at long range while stationary would be acceptable imo.
30 Nov 2014, 11:09 AM
#15
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Are you comparing 222 scout car to Soviet AA half truck? Because if you do you should be compering it to USF and OKW half trucks.


USF AA Half-Track. Early game mobile suppression, anti-infantry, and anti-vehicle.
30 Nov 2014, 11:58 AM
#16
avatar of Doomgunner

Posts: 74



USF AA Half-Track. Early game mobile suppression, anti-infantry, and anti-vehicle.


Against much more effective/early arriving(compared to US Stuart/AT guns in a typical BO) vehicle counter that Axis have: Schreks, Puma, Pak40,teller. 222 also have much more sight(50) than AAHT(35),thus making it even harder to flank/disable with infantry AT snare.
30 Nov 2014, 12:46 PM
#17
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439



USF AA Half-Track. Early game mobile suppression, anti-infantry, and anti-vehicle.

Still, you're comparing scout car to a Half truck. Compare 222 with Dodge, M20 or Soviet M3A.
Also analyse at what point USF appears in the game, its role and what are the counters available at this time.
30 Nov 2014, 13:58 PM
#18
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

Ok give it bullet prof armor would be nice too. Siilar to USF utility car
30 Nov 2014, 14:00 PM
#19
avatar of some one

Posts: 935


Compare 222 with Dodge, M20 or Soviet M3A.


Mu ha ha ha
We would never seen Soviet snipers in the begining or such PUSSHING with US infantry. If u give it in thier 1
30 Nov 2014, 14:16 PM
#20
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



Mu ha ha ha
We would never seen Soviet snipers in the begining or such PUSSHING with US infantry. If u give it in thier 1


If that T1 would cost 50 fuel and you started with 10-15 maybe.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

486 users are online: 486 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49152
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM