Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback

Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback

PAGES (49)down
Relic
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
Smartie
2 Apr 2021, 08:15 AM
#61
avatar of Smartie

Posts: 857 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 07:48 AMHannibal
Riegel mine is still not worth a full commander slot. This mine is already gated behind a vehicle, I think we can safely bundle it with another small ability.
I once suggested the forward observation post, but defense fortifications or breakthrough equipment (buildable by pios) would fit as well.


+1 Very good idea and I hope it makes it to the 1.1 version.


jump backJump back to quoted post1 Apr 2021, 17:47 PMVonManteuffel
Nice patch all in all. I am really looking forward to it!
German Mechanized is absolutely underwhelimg. Nothing for lategame and nothing with high impact.


I agree with this judgement. Compared to other commanders Mechanized dont offers enough to justity a pick. Mortar HT as Manteuffel suggested instead of the 250 would be a good decision. That would make the smoke bombs superfluous and would give you 1 commander slot more to fill.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Aarotron
2 Apr 2021, 09:15 AM
#62
avatar of Aarotron

Posts: 563

Id like if the foward observation post for 251 would camo infantry in its near vicinity. It should NOT give ambush damage, but work as way to regroup to reinforce near front and reward soft retreating when its used well.
"Pain is almost euphoric sam!"
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Tiger Baron
2 Apr 2021, 09:29 AM
#63
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 09:15 AMAarotron
Id like if the foward observation post for 251 would camo infantry in its near vicinity. It should NOT give ambush damage, but work as way to regroup to reinforce near front and reward soft retreating when its used well.


I mean why not just give it a forward retreat at this point to actually make it useful?

Ost is the only Army without one right now anyway.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
2 Apr 2021, 09:46 AM
#64
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 09:29 AMTiger Baron


I mean why not just give it a forward retreat at this point to actually make it useful?

Ost is the only Army without one right now anyway.

Ost is also the only army that can get mobile forward reinforcement by 5th minute and "regular" forward reinforcement pretty much as soon as they have 60 muni.

They don't have forward retreat point, because they don't need it, they have no problem staying ground if you actually utilize these options.
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
KiwiBirb
2 Apr 2021, 09:52 AM
#65
avatar of KiwiBirb

Posts: 789

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 09:46 AMKatitof

Ost is also the only army that can get mobile forward reinforcement by 5th minute and "regular" forward reinforcement pretty much as soon as they have 60 muni.

They don't have forward retreat point, because they don't need it, they have no problem staying ground if you actually utilize these options.



They may have these, but because 4 man squads are so squashy hitting retreat is often necessary to not get wiped. 4 man squads are fine, but they do not work well with soft retreating.
Most of my ideas are probably bad, - but I try and share lots of them

and maybe some of them will be good an improve the game
One can hope
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Tiger Baron
2 Apr 2021, 09:53 AM
#66
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 09:46 AMKatitof

Ost is also the only army that can get mobile forward reinforcement by 5th minute and "regular" forward reinforcement pretty much as soon as they have 60 muni.

They don't have forward retreat point, because they don't need it, they have no problem staying ground if you actually utilize these options.


Because 1v1s and 2v2s are the only maps in the game and there are no large team maps where this would come in use or give the mobile post an actual purpose instead of just a gimmick.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Sander93
2 Apr 2021, 12:04 PM
#67
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 07:48 AMHannibal
Riegel mine is still not worth a full commander slot. This mine is already gated behind a vehicle, I think we can safely bundle it with another small ability.

I once suggested the forward observation post


We were discussing merging MOP and Riegels into a "251 package", but it would require some tweaks. For example MOP not stacking with spotting scopes. But I think it'd be real nice to merge them.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ZeroZeroNi
2 Apr 2021, 12:08 PM
#68
avatar of ZeroZeroNi

Posts: 1563

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 12:04 PMSander93


We were discussing merging MOP and Riegels into a "251 package", but it would require some tweaks. For example MOP not stacking with spotting scopes. But I think it'd be real nice to merge them.

What MOP gonna replace in Jaeger Armor recon overflight????
Kinda off topic what about merging 250 with Mortar HT and giving them same requirement to be built from the HQ.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
2 Apr 2021, 12:13 PM
#69
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 12:08 PMZeroZeroNi

What MOP gonna replace in Jaeger Armor recon overflight????

Good suggestion, we should go with it. Planes don't fit armor doctrines.
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Sander93
2 Apr 2021, 12:15 PM
#70
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 12:08 PMZeroZeroNi
What MOP gonna replace in Jaeger Armor recon overflight????


No, it would get merged into the Riegel mine slot.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ZeroZeroNi
2 Apr 2021, 12:17 PM
#71
avatar of ZeroZeroNi

Posts: 1563

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 12:15 PMSander93


No, it would get merged into the Riegel mine slot.
So will this give reigal mines to HT in Srategic reserves too.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Sander93
2 Apr 2021, 12:17 PM
#72
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

Yes. And to Mobile Defense that just got the MOP added.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Vipper
2 Apr 2021, 12:23 PM
#73
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 12:17 PMSander93
Yes. And to Mobile Defense that just got the MOP added.

I would rather make the ability more AT designed and combine it with:
Riegiel for PG
Clock for Packs (no first strike bonuses)

If you go with MOP change the vehicles into an call-in available even without T2 building instead of an upgrade.
:)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ZeroZeroNi
2 Apr 2021, 12:27 PM
#74
avatar of ZeroZeroNi

Posts: 1563

I wonder how many revisions the commander patch is gonna get. When is set to release anyway.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Hannibal
2 Apr 2021, 12:43 PM
#75
avatar of Hannibal
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 12:04 PMSander93


We were discussing merging MOP and Riegels into a "251 package", but it would require some tweaks. For example MOP not stacking with spotting scopes. But I think it'd be real nice to merge them.


I hope this goes through. Would be at least a doctrinal solution of making one light vehicle useful for the late game.


I also saw that the mechanized assault group (PGrens+250) is still unchanged. I assume this one is still under discussion?
True infantry DPS calculator!
Download and Info here (infantry DPS) and here (power model)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Vipper
2 Apr 2021, 12:43 PM
#76
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

0sttruppen


Imo the unit should be designed for more utility than fighting capability.

Suggestion:

Change the unit to be ideal crews for support weapons increasing synergy with weapon drops.

Change target size 1

Change aim to make them ideal for manning support weapons and allowing to be produces in late game when their target size of the unvetted squad turns them useless.


Add a squad penalty of target size 1.25 when the unit is in cover.
That should bring the performance back to current level.

Scrap the LMG upgrade, since concentrate DPS is not a good design for large entities squads.
Allow an upgrade that remove the cover mechanism completely and buff their weapons to fire as if in cover always.

Rebalance the rifle's performance in cover if needed.

Possibly add a grenade or molov or merge

The change will add utility the squad and allow them to be useful for the duration of the game.
:)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
EtherealDragon
2 Apr 2021, 15:57 PM
#77
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 07:48 AMHannibal
Riegel mine is still not worth a full commander slot. This mine is already gated behind a vehicle, I think we can safely bundle it with another small ability.
I once suggested the forward observation post, but defense fortifications or breakthrough equipment (buildable by pios) would fit as well.

I am very happy that the Jager Command squad got into a sevond commander (it is one of the best units OST can offer - durable, strong, provides recon but not cheesy), but I am slightly unhappy that of all things the Riegel had to give up one of its two slots. There are many other abilities that occur 3 times and more. If we want diverse commanders, we should swap those high frequency abilities for less frequently used ones, not swap within the lesser used



This was my initial reaction as well. I do find it kind of odd that they added Jaeger to another commander with ambush training so Storm feels kind of same-y now since both have 2/5 slots the same and Light Arty and Stuka Bomb have similar role of off map Munitions ability. I get that it makes sense thematically with the Commander name and isn't a huge deal but I'd kind of preferred if new slots didn't overlap as much.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
FunPolice
2 Apr 2021, 16:25 PM
#78
avatar of FunPolice

Posts: 133

I hope something can be done to improve the CAS commander. Luftwaffe Supply Doctrine got a lot of excellent changes that have made it way more appealing but the CAS commander has pretty much gotten zero changes. It needs something. Maybe it could have the supply drop replaced with something else to generate extra munitions that is more reliable?
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
TomDRV
2 Apr 2021, 17:44 PM
#79
avatar of TomDRV

Posts: 112

Concrete Bunker:

Letting an MG bunker reinforce on the front just seems . . . weird and I can see a self-reinforced mortar team camped behind.

Suggestion: Remove reinforcing from the MG bunker. Add a 'forward CP' upgrade'.

Grants reinforcing, several medics and a forward retreat (OST doesn't have one yet)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Vipper
2 Apr 2021, 18:33 PM
#80
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Forward Resupply Station


Also allows the construction of repair bunker not mention on notes.

Suggestions:
Always one aura are bad, make the aura timed, reduce number of pioneer to 4 reduce fuel cost to 30, set health of building to set level 75-100%.

Can now build concrete bunker for 200 manpower. Upgrades:
1) Repair for 100 manpower
2) medic for free.
Can drop medic kits similar to soviet rally point
Can upgrade as Forward retreat point reacquiring T3 or BP 3 and reinforcement point for 100 manpower
:)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (49)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
9
 Download
Download
1231
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

421 users are online: 421 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM