Posts: 195
As a QoL improvement, would people like ATGs and TDs to have Vehicle Priority on by default?
This would mean newly built ATGs and AT vehicles, recrewed ATGs and recrewed Jacksons/M10s would all have Vehicle Priority by default so you wouldn't need to toggle it on all the time.
The only real downside is that it's gonna take everyone some time to adjust to it.
Posts: 1794
When the commander reworks come, most likely.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Don't forget the soviet mortar flare too then!
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1794
Why?
It got its own balancing factors that keep it in check.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It is just not good and go against the principles of coh too easily
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1954
As a QoL improvement, would people like ATGs and TDs to have Vehicle Priority on by default?
This would mean newly built ATGs and AT vehicles, recrewed ATGs and recrewed Jacksons/M10s would all have Vehicle Priority by default so you wouldn't need to toggle it on all the time.
The only real downside is that it's gonna take everyone some time to adjust to it.
Posts: 5279
It is just not good and go against the principles of coh too easily
Posts: 1794
having a unit in range witha timed recon that requires munitions goes against the principals of coh? i really do not follow....
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
yes the timing is too long for a game that has sped up considerable over many patches.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 5279
yes the timing is too long for a game that has sped up considerable over many patches.
Posts: 1794
I don't follow.
Posts: 1289
yes the reveal times ligner too long and too wide an area.
something need to change. so reactions are fairly treated
just like the zis barrage, follow up shots are too fast, and mostly your weapon crew are dead even if you hit fast retreat
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
yes the reveal times ligner too long and too wide an area.
something need to change. so reactions are fairly treated
just like the zis barrage, follow up shots are too fast, and mostly your weapon crew are dead even if you hit fast retreat
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 176
The only thing that needs to change is OKW flares.
Any other flare requiers a unit to be fielded, moved where it needs to be and ability to be used, just like any other scouting ability in game that is located on a unit.
Its up only a fraction of time OKW flares are as well, so that "too long" arguments gets thrown out of the window.
UHU reveals much larger area and you don't even pay for it, so maybe nerf this instead?
Oh and if "follow up shots" are too fast for you, perhaps you should improve your micro and not let your weapon teams sit in barrage for half a minute instead of blaming irrelevant factor?
Posts: 1594
The only thing that needs to change is OKW flares.
Any other flare requiers a unit to be fielded, moved where it needs to be and ability to be used, just like any other scouting ability in game that is located on a unit.
Its up only a fraction of time OKW flares are as well, so that "too long" arguments gets thrown out of the window.
UHU reveals much larger area and you don't even pay for it, so maybe nerf this instead?
Oh and if "follow up shots" are too fast for you, perhaps you should improve your micro and not let your weapon teams sit in barrage for half a minute instead of blaming irrelevant factor?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I dont play too much Brit, but whats about all frontline flare from a commander?
Whats the CP? Cost? How does it activated?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1594
Last time I've checked you couldn't use it to spot and blow up arty near your opponents base.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Allies already have that in the form of nondoctrinal recon planes, at least for USF. Given that one of these planes comes from the opponent's base sector (At vet), it's similarly nearly uncounterable in practical terms.
It's also worth stating that only Soviet opponents will have artillery vulnerable to such a flare, given that USF and UKF artillery are mobile vehicles, not emplaced guns.
I think the recon tools of a lot of factions need a lot of fiddling with.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Allies already have that in the form of nondoctrinal recon planes, at least for USF. Given that one of these planes comes from the opponent's base sector (At vet), it's similarly nearly uncounterable in practical terms.
It's also worth stating that only Soviet opponents will have artillery vulnerable to such a flare, given that USF and UKF artillery are mobile vehicles, not emplaced guns.
I think the recon tools of a lot of factions need a lot of fiddling with.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1594
Just to clarify
Reckon planes are now available also from UKF and OKW in the patch. In addition UKF have some weird abilities that combine call in or off map with reckon.
 |
|
|
36 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
50 | ||
 |
|
|
27 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
