Posts: 1289
It simply means that contrary to the intention as explained in he patch notes they where not brought up to be "on par" but where made superior instead.
Posts: 5279
Shock;s grenades are not "on par" with cooked grenades they simply superior.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
It simply means that contrary to the intention as explained in he patch notes they where not brought up to be "on par" but where made superior instead.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It simply means that contrary to the intention as explained in he patch notes they where not brought up to be "on par" but where made superior instead.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1273
Nothing in the patch notes since 2015 talks about Shocks grenades being on par with anything or even refering to their performance.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1273
They forgot to add that to the official changelog. I've asked Sturm if that could be fix at the time but oh well.
The final preview SHOULD be what we got for the patch.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 1273
I don't think changes had been done but if there is doubt as to what the patch notes said, we have the changelog here https://www.coh2.org/topic/4307/company-of-heroes-2-changelog/page/6
Posts: 1273
Pick up your mic.
If you scroll down a bit more to a later preview post you'll see this:
Don't see anything about "on par" with other infantry.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
(drops mic) I said "based on preview build" aka that particular iteration of the build, not later ones.
Posts: 2358
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
you are not looking anywhere near the package though. balance has to do with context. units with cooked nades can do more. shocks do the one thing they do really well. specialists ALWAYS are more efficient for similar costs at their one job. ALWAYS. having a slightly better nade isnt an issue, certainly not game breaking and far from needing to be on the 4th page of a discussion...
if shocks were more versatile i would be on board with bringing the nade more inline with other, more flexible units grenades. but they are not, so it doesnt need to be changed.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Stop lying, nothing in the patch notes since 2015 talks about Shocks grenades being on par with anything or even refering to their performance.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
What I have pointed out so far is that Shock where not designed to better grenades as claimed.
As for "specialist" the closest thing to Shock troops are ranges/smg paras who use the cooked grenade that is inferior to shock's grenades
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Made superior to what? Generalist infantry nades?
Specialist AI units ALWAYS had better nades, since day 1.
They don't seem to be better then other elite infantry nades and in some cases (PGs nuclear nades) are worse.
Posts: 5279
What I have pointed out so far is that Shock where not designed to better grenades as claimed.
As for "specialist" the closest thing to Shock troops are ranges/smg paras who use the cooked grenade that is inferior to shock's grenades
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
 |
|
|
105 | ||
|
|
|
|
34 | ||
 |
|
|
29 | ||
|
|
|
|
27 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
