Profile of RMMLz

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 27 Dec 2013, 16:54 PM
Last Visit Time: 28 Mar 2024, 23:06 PM
Website: https://shaderweb.com/en
Residence:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Nationality:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Timezone: Asia/Tehran
Game Name: <HOJAT>RMMLz

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 5 May 2015, 17:46 PM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 16:48 PMturbotortoise More Stuff Hmmm... What you say makes me think. It need a lot of testing, because yes, if you have well-scaled T3 units along with call-ins, it's gonna screw things up. Needs a lot of testing. About Whermact, I 100% agree with you. You can't over-extend, you lose map control, and a single wipe might cost you the whole game. There is no room for error, Ostheer needs better early game map control options. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Non meta units/commanders you play5 May 2015, 17:40 PM You know what's funny? There are A LOT of so-called "non-meta" play styles posted here and people claim that they are viable and you can win with them, but we have countless threads about how "stale" the game is right now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wishing Good Luck to the Alpha Testers!5 May 2015, 17:11 PM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 16:24 PMbeemer8 Anyone who has fun in an alpha, is doing it wrong. lol They need as much patience as they can muster, long fought out hours and hours of on end testing, trying to re-create bugs, writing long posts, give opinions on how to change it, and if history repeats to start having a somewhat solid game come release, then to have everything changed release date, then the backlash from the community to the testers (all stuff everyone already knows) God speed alpha testers. May you fight for a brighter future, no matter how unappreciated you guys may seem, Keep your heads up and Crush them bugs! That's... not what alpha is, at least for Relic. I am talking about my experience in the previous alpha (WFA). They just care about their numbers and statistics, and they implement drastic changes at final minutes. I hope it won't be the case in this alpha though, and as a lucky alpha tester I'll try my best to at least address some bugs. In: Lobby
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 5 May 2015, 15:53 PM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 12:47 PMZyllen Stuff Yes, bad luck. Frontally it should not be able to deal with an IS2, but 50% chance to penetrate the rear armor at close range is fine for a T3 medium armor. Although I have to point out that PzIV is fine, but if you want to argue about IS2 and it's performance, that's another thing. The over performance of the call-in meta is obvious. Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 15:22 PMturbotortoise Stuff Things got a little mixed up here. Are we debating Ostheer's T3 viability, PzIV or Soviet Call-ins? Allow me to start with this: What if you could not finish the game early with the T70 rush (which with a good micro, you can as you said)? If the Axis player is only half decent, chances are you will probably lose the game because your T3 tier is lackluster, and it's gonna take a lot of time to wait for call-ins. About T34/76, I don't want it to actually counter a panther outright. I just want it to become more powerful with vet, in a way which doesn't make them totally helpless versus a Panther. This is very important when we are talking about "fixing the call-ins". People simply ask for call-in nerfs (by increasing CP and/or price) but that's not the only change we need. If you nerf call-ins, people are forced to use stock units (which opens more room for variety in the game), so you have to give them better options. So both nerfing the call-ins AND tweaking stock units and tiers is the answer. So bottom line what I'm saying is I actually want to see your vision of T3 (which is them being a bridge between T1/2 and call-ins), but that needs two major changes: -Fixing Ostheer's teching (Unless we fix this, any buff to Soviets mid and late game will utterly crush Ostheer) -Buffing stock units of the Soviets -Nerfing the call-ins. PS:I also disagree with PzIVs always beating Shermans, specially with Shermans' super duper accuracy on the move. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 5 May 2015, 11:59 AM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 11:34 AMturbotortoise In much the same way wehrmacht T3 and OKW puma's aren't all that great against heavy allied armour. We've all seen the PiV v. IS2 film. People go Panther or >, in order to counter allied medium armor. Well, I have to disagree with you on this one. Ostheer's T3 is a lot more viable than Soviets T3, and I think we do agree that Ostheer's T3 doesn't have any problem versus USF (at least on paper). Against Soviets, things are different yes, but still a vet 3 P4 is A LOT MORE intimidating than a vet 3 T34. I know, they should be because P4s are more expensive but the difference is greater than the actual fuel cost if you ask me. OKW's puma is ok IMO, specially with the 5 vet system, and the utility it has. But you don't expect the puma to counter an IS2 do you? PS: That video does not prove anything. That was just pure bad luck. I'm up for some RNG adjustments but come on, that doesn't prove that P4s are 100% useless versus IS2. All that being said, the call in meta should be fixed. starting with some adjustments to stock units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 5 May 2015, 08:32 AM It's not a T34/76 thread but I just wanna point out one thing. T34/76 is very viable when arrives, specially if you rush for one. It fast, kinda cheap (although 90 or something would be better) and a well microed well supported T34/76 can finish the game quickly, if you avoid PAKs and snares. But the problem is something else. It scales terribly and after 6-7 minutes, when heavier axis units arrive (most notably tigers and Panthers) they become absolute trash, specially if you enemy is not brain dead and supports their tanks well. Axis units already have superior armor and HP, but some of them (PzIV, Panther, JGPzIV for instance) gain more survivability when they gain vet, along with increased firepower (mostly RoF, turret rotation and accuracy). So they are both superior and they become more viable as the game goes. If they add something like this to T34/76, people would buy more T34s and the whole T3 would be much more viable and cost efficient. Suggestions: -Increased armor at vet 3 or -Increased penetration at vet 3 (IIRC, t34/76 has 120/100/80 pen and 85 has 160/140/120. Buffing T34/76 to something like 150/130/110 at vet 3 might be a good idea.) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wishing Good Luck to the Alpha Testers!5 May 2015, 08:19 AM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 08:15 AMJackiebrown No, I was just looking to wish everyone good luck today in the alpha. I thought a modified version of Eisenhower's Great Crusade speach would go well with it. I hope it goes well too, and your version of the speech was hilarious In: Lobby
Thread: ELI5 Why we can't have a reconnect option.5 May 2015, 07:56 AM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 07:43 AMrezzzzen I think coh2 has battleservers too so p2p is a history. Thing is that there is too much going on the map for reconnect to be possible. Also there is a reconnect feature which does reconnecting but its only few seconds after u lose connection and its not functioning like standard reconnect feature(no button, is automatic). Maybe someone can explain more P2P is not history, battleservers only act as Relays, they are not dedicated game servers and one player is always the Host. But reconnect is not possible at the current state. Read *this* You can find a lot more about why Reconnect is not possible/very costly. Just search the forum and you'll find a buttload of threads. @Mods: This issue has been discussed like crazy in the past, I don't think it's necessary to dwell on it any more. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Non meta units/commanders you play5 May 2015, 07:30 AM SU-76 rush. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 5 May 2015, 07:26 AM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 02:36 AMDomine Ostheers teching is overpriced by quite a bit. But the P4 needs to cost more as it beats both T-34 and Sherman in AT and arguably AI. I'm with you on Teching, but how does PzIV beats Sherman in AI? In: COH2 Balance