Profile of RMMLz

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 27 Dec 2013, 16:54 PM
Last Visit Time: 28 Mar 2024, 23:06 PM
Website: https://shaderweb.com/en
Residence:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Nationality:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Timezone: Asia/Tehran
Game Name: <HOJAT>RMMLz

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Do you think this alpha should be in waves?29 Apr 2015, 15:06 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2015, 14:46 PMBrick Top I get a feeling Alphas are more about polishing bugs and appearance out. Balance is more of a fine adjustment thing that takes time and is probably easier when the game is being played in the public domain. Not really, we had some drastic changes in the previous alpha. What you say makes sense, but that's not the case here. It was like 5-6 days prior to release and they changed the whole mechanics of OKW. Not that it was a mistake, but come on, changes like that at the final moments? In: Lobby
Thread: Units which fail to gain veterancy for being too UP.29 Apr 2015, 12:46 PM I don't agree with: -IS2: Use it as an AT unit, it's even very effective versus most heavies. -Maxim: It's fine IMO. -Sturmpioneers: they vet very fast early game when there is less chance of an insta-wipe, suppress with kuble and close in with Pios. They get to vet 2/3 early game and with that buff they can survive late game. -Kuble: I've seen a lot of vet 2-3 Kubles both in games I play and in streams. After armor rolls in, Kuble is done for but that doesn't mean it should vet faster -Ostwind: against blobbers, it's vet requirements are fine. I'm not saying the unit is perfectly fine itself, but I don't see any problem with XP requirement. I agree with the rest, specially Sturmtiger. Add Combat Engis to the list. CEs and Pios only gain vet if you give the flamers. I think both mine sweeping (as TheMachine said) and repairing should give them XP. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Open Alpha - TeamSpeak available for testers29 Apr 2015, 12:23 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2015, 12:09 PMThoseDeafMutes Australian accent reporting in. You can come on the condition that I'm allowed to refer to your country Persia Permission Granted In: Lobby
Thread: 2v2 with Aerohank a must see!!29 Apr 2015, 08:42 AM Dudes wiping with 120 left and right and spamming ZiS ATGs, complaining about RNG and PAK spam. In: Replays
Thread: UKF alpha test29 Apr 2015, 06:57 AM The moment when you wake up by hearing your phone's email-alert and you're like "Who the hell sends an emails at.... whaaaat I'm in." I'm more excited about this alpha, I don't know why I've never liked the previous one. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic, you gonna fix 120mm, or not?29 Apr 2015, 06:06 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2015, 21:02 PMArclyte lol you people are delusional I don't get what you mean. Is it OK to have a very very expensive unit which is an auto win? I'm not talking about 120 or Stuka I'm just saying it's NOT a legit argument to say "It's expensive so it should fuck you up". Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2015, 05:42 AMNEVEC Expensive doesn't mean it should oneshot multiple squads. 400 hitpoints tank, compared to T70 it's not easy to counter. This is not about Stuka, but I agree that simply because Stuka is very expensive and has minimal AT capabilities it should not perform like this. But it has nothing to do with 120. PS: Please stop with this Tit for tat attitude. "Oh we have 120 what about Stuka Oh you have IS2 we have... blah blah blah." Although a units performance is tied to the meta, faction design, play style and many other factors, "comparing units" isn't helping in discussions (There are exceptions though). Specially when you compare 120mm to Stuka. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: BARs or M1919s29 Apr 2015, 05:48 AM It depends on your play style, it's your commander choice and you can't simply compare one simple passive ability (M1919) with a core feature (BAR). That being said, it depends on your play style. If you want to dig in (AKA camp) M1919 is for you, specially if the enemy is blobbing (most notably OKW). You can easily use Defensive Stance and suppress high value targets (LMG34Obers, Flamers, AT squads). Keep in mind that if you use this, are game becomes more static and you might get REKT by StuKa (GGWP in the first barrage), CAS (CAS REKS everything in that matter), Mortars off-map arty and Pzwerfer in larger games. You are gonna need Jacksons for late game and you probably won't need Shermans/Scotts. On the other hand, with the BAR you do great amount of damage on the move and it's ideal if the enemy is using weapon teams (HMGs, Mortars, PAKs) and your whole army is mobile. You can also chase and finish off retreating squads with BARs easily. There is less chance to get REKS by Stuka. BARs are great in urban maps while M1919s are good in open maps. In: Lobby
Thread: Double T34/85s and PrettyEasy Eight29 Apr 2015, 05:39 AM First of all, all faction should have equal, but different Pros and Cons at every stage of the game. But unfortunately, this is not 100% true at the current state. But OP is not about this issue, but you are talking about the call-in meta which is... well we all know that what's wrong with the call-in meta. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Open Alpha - TeamSpeak available for testers29 Apr 2015, 05:35 AM Since everyone is talking about their "sexy voice" or "accent" I will Insert offensive middle eastern stereotypical accent here you then Looking forward to it. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic: Ask Duffy28 Apr 2015, 19:07 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2015, 18:27 PMAlexzandvar The questions should be picked via random number generator in order to ensure consistency. RNG to ensure dramatic consistency. In: Lobby