I agree with OP, the suppression mechanic is inconsistent with all other light artillery, and is currently breaking the game. I'm not fond of my units being randomly instant-pinned by something 60 units away in the fog anyway. Remove the suppression and it should be fine. |
I actually got inspired by one of the M20 bulletins that explicitly says it was occasionally used as a transport.
The bulletins say a lot of things that aren't represented in-game, they're hardly a source of relevant information. |
Yeah, that's something I forgot to add, they should be as expensive in vanguard as they are in commando commander, maybe like 50 manpower cheaper for the glider. Inconsistence in their cost makes them impossible to ballance.
Personally I feel like they should be replaced in Vanguard with "Glider Infantry", which could be the Airborne equivalent to Tommies. Letting you build Commandos in Vanguard really strips away Commando Regiment's thunder, especially since they're much cheaper. |
My suggestion is giving them 4 men if a player doesnt use the bolster squad size upgrade. And that would be it, your sugestions are way too harsh for such an expensive unit, nerfing every single stat a unit has is never a good idea.
They cost less than Obersoldaten or Shock Troops, they're not expensive. They're extremely efficient for what they do. I agree with OP's assessment, it's similar to the suggestions laid out by Cruzz, and he generally has a good idea of what's going on in the game's files. |
Why does USF even have the 57mm?
The 76mm AT Gun was the standard for the time period.
It wasn't the standard, the 57mm was more common. It also weighed twice as much as the 57mm, 1700 pounds (785 kilograms) more than the current heaviest AT Gun, the Pak 40. Still lighter and weaker than a 17 Pounder or Pak 40, so it doesn't warrant an emplacement. |
October 7th Hotfix
Bugs
- Fixed issue that allowed Intel Bulletins to incorrectly Stack.
http://community.companyofheroes.com/forum/company-of-heroes-2/company-of-heroes-2-general-discussion/67-coh-2-changelog?p=220867#post220867
Rest in Piece, Bulletin stacking. Dozens upon dozens of bulletins cry out, as they are completely useless without it |
-snip- |
And the 6 pounder is LITERALLLY the usf AT gun in reality
Yes but Relic decided the British were gonna excel at everything if used properly, and go all-in on the AT units. Even the AEC and Valentine were modeled with 75mm Guns rather than the 2 pounders or 6 pounders they more commonly had. |
Minus the +50% increased accuracy vs vehicles that the stock 6 pounder gets
All AT Guns should have this.
Buff bazookas to shrek Level too, axis got all the fine stuff (pak, handheld at,Tanks, lategame). Im german myself but relics axis favourism cant be unseen
Funny people still complain about axis favoritism despite Allied strength at the moment. The Bazooka is worse than the Panzerschreck because that's how it was in reality. |
Thread: KV-87 Oct 2015, 09:20 AM
Why axis can callin puma, stug, command tank, tiger without spending on tier? I would like tie all tanks to buiildings.
Puma and StuG E have no corresponding tier, Ostheer skips over light armour phase and jumps straight into medium armour. Putting them in T2 would be too early, but putting them in T3 would be too late. |