Profile of Crecer13

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: AT / Raktenwerfer OKW revamp8 Jun 2019, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2019, 14:02 PMVipper Again it not "a suicidal last chance shot" it is only shot it would use. Pak36 was obsolete and the Stielgranate 41 was the only way to make it viable. A crew woun't give their position by firing anything else. They would simply ambush and wait until enemy units where in range. Of course, he can make one shot and: - firstly it will be surrounded, tanks are usually moved by a group and will be destroyed by another tank - Secondly, the tanks are usually accompanied by infantry, so the infantry will also try to destroy the crew, and notice the infantry's chances are very good 200 meters from the cannon. - in the third, the loader will have to leave the shelter and load the cannon on the barrel, this will unmask the cannon and the loader most likely the dubet is immediately killed may not be entirely correct, but here are historical footage from the PAK-36 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AT / Raktenwerfer OKW revamp8 Jun 2019, 13:29 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2019, 11:43 AMDomine The Stielgranate was used because it turned the tiny 37mm into a formidable weapon that was capable of penetrating and destroying any tank, be it Allied or Axis, at all ranges. People underestimate HEAT weaponry. When the Germans introduced their 7.5cm HEAT shells, the short 7.5cm became able to penetrate every tank on the planet, and that was in 1940. This grenade had a speed of 110 m / s (not very accurate) and a firing range of 200 meters. This is practically the same range as the Panzerschreck. But the Panzerschreck crew has two people, you can shoot and run. With PaK-36 you do not like, this is a suicidal last chance shot. So you overestimate Stielgranate 41. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AT / Raktenwerfer OKW revamp8 Jun 2019, 10:25 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2019, 09:25 AMVipper I am not sure how a historical fact "makes even less sense" ino your opinion. In addition: "Stielgranate 41 was the last hope shot" is incorrect. IT was the first shot and it could take most allied tanks. This means that this is just a Raktenwerfer clone with the worst characteristics. Does not make sense. Stielgranate 41 was used because it is cool, but because we need the maximum amount of anything that fired at the enemy. As an option, give Trophy ZIS-3 for OKW, if PaK-40 is too powerful for OKW In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AT / Raktenwerfer OKW revamp8 Jun 2019, 09:01 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2019, 08:05 AMVipper Pak36 was used even it end of the war firing Stielgranate 41 And that makes even less sense, Stielgranate 41 was the last hope shot. It does the same job as the Raktenwerfer, but the grenade is charged at the end of the barrel, which reduces the rate of fire and increases the risk of crew death. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T48 Jun 2019, 06:58 AM Objectively, there is no need for the T-34-76. his position can be improved or made him T3.5 so that he would come earlier than T4 or make it necessary in T4: modifying it to the flamethrower OT-34 would give it real use, but there is no new animation - so this is not realistic. Improve it in T4 but make it more expensive: more penetration, give a veteran ability to "fire and maneuver" which increases the speed of movement and the speed of rotation of the turret. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T47 Jun 2019, 18:42 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2019, 18:29 PMmiragefla Or Just build T-34s and have SU-85s in support, using T-34s as tanks to secure flanks, go for flanks, and shield given they're not incredibly expensive to replace. T-34 is generally not worth its price. For almost the same price I will build a SU-85 + Katyusha which will be much more efficient. And to spend 300 mp and 90 fuel for the Shield = the path to lose. For a flank tank, it has low speed, penetration if instead of a ramming it would be a speed increase, then it would be relevant for flank strike. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T47 Jun 2019, 17:42 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2019, 17:37 PMKatitof That would make T34/76 op and would remove T70 from the game. Currently T-34-76 is removed but present in T4. T-34-76 can be transferred to T3 by increasing the cost and performance against tanks. T-70 can be produced in T0 after building T1 / T2 and unlock. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T47 Jun 2019, 17:18 PM I agree, right now in T-34-76 there is no point in T4. If you want anti-infantry - the T-70 in T3 will be faster. Because the T-34 comes late against infantry and noncompetitive against tanks. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Port of hamburg7 Jun 2019, 12:50 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2019, 11:10 AMKirrik And axis players cant invest in Stukas and Werfers LeFHs?, right? Because only allies have acess to artillery. In almost every game the Germans are spamming artillery, so personally I personally always have a commander with an IL-2 bomb. If you take the Guards commander recon and IL-2 is a much easier game. In: Lobby
Thread: Port of hamburg7 Jun 2019, 06:19 AM People like such a map, because on it you can make a reliable front line, instead of having many holes like on other maps. And I personally like this card and I do not find any problems for me to play from any side. In: Lobby