Profile of Crecer13

As far as I remember it wasn't a very successful rifle. The cartridge was too powerful to shoot short bursts like STG would and the gun had no bipod to be used like a BAR. In effect the only point of using full auto was fighting in close quarters. Such characteristics, when transformed into coh2 weapon model would mean very short burst at long to mid range, effectively equal to SVT and big dps increase at short range that would overlap with SMGs. It doesn't sound great, does it?

Btw. honestly, we don't really need assault rifle on every faction. And SVT troops definitely give soviet forces enough mid range oriented firepower.

Look at how pretty controllable the AVT-40 is in short bursts, even the full automaton has a return strictly backward. And M14 - which jumps like a mad bull.
Show Spoiler

Also about the AVT, the soldiers demanded that they be sent more AVT to the front, the SVTs altered in AVT in the front-line masters. And therefore, from 1943 until 1945, SVT was produced only as AVT. The soldiers liked the automatic fire in critical situations.
For AVT produced 15-cartridge magazine. Like this soldier of the Czechoslovakian corpus:
Show Spoiler
In 1944, when Tokarev modernized the SVT-40, a reliable 20-cartridge magazine for SVT was developed. Improved SVT was not produced (because in 1943 the military focused entirely on weapons for an intermediate cartridge), but the 20-cartridge magazine was issued in small batches and used on the front.
Show Spoiler

I would like to see a reworked Summer Rzhev map.

https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/combat-studies-institute/csi-books/glantz.pdf
The Soviet Airborne Experience - Army University Press

About Soviet paratroopers briefly:
Show Spoiler

Concerning the Soviet Airborne Commander:
He is clearly not an OP, but has a number of things that need to be changed:
- Replace three DP-27 with two buff DP-27, DP is the worst machine gun in the game and it is pretty obvious because for good performance you need three machine guns (!). It would be fair for the BAR 1918 - because it is an automatic rifle and to compensate for the lack of power at the end of the war in the infantry platoon there were three BAR 1918. The DP is full-fledged and a good machine gun was enough for one or two DP to support the infantry platoon.
- Abilities of the Airborne Forces do not match their role and armament

- the IL-2 missile strafe is terrible - immovable Kübelwagen lost only 1/4 of health after a direct hit by a rocket.Plus he has a bug that doesn’t correspond to the ability area and actually launched missiles.
And this despite the fact that the German 37-mm anti-tank strafe destroys the full T-34-76 and SU-85 from one pass
Replacing IL-2 missile strafe with IL-2 PTAB is reliable and effective.

Is it me or do the SVT not show up on the models when they pick up the weapons. Engineers & Cons don't show the SVT when equipped. The only models that do show equipped are the penals.

The ability does not work, you spend 45 ammunition and instead of SVT-40 you get 25 ammunition.

Pls do not this make personal.

I am not against synergy, I am against abilities that hard to balance and create more issues that they actually solve.

Unless Relic decides to implement one solid system do balance this weapons this will always be problematic.

A systems like that would either need to have different squads pick different weapons (ober/commando...) style or specific modifiers for each squad applying to picked weapons (osttruppen style.

Else these weapon will be problematic. Take for instance Royal engineer or R.E. which will be able to punch way above their cost.

In sort, this ability serves little purpose in 1vs1 and creates a whole lot of issues in 2vs2

I watch a funny contradiction: people complain that the M3 HT weapon drop OP. But I do not see any person who would play these commanders in team games. And you are talking about SVT drop, which is just a joke in comparison with the great and terrible OP Vickers and PIAT drop.