Profile of Jaigen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1130

General Information


Thread: Soviet mines needs at least 2x cost for its effectiveness7 Feb 2014, 16:02 PM complete squad wipes rarely happen. that said german mines need to be alterd. that 80 ammo AI is not only way to expensive but also far to large and a lot mines are theirfore not in a good position. most german players simply chancel after they build one block . the solution is to simply make AI mines one block and reduce the ammo cost to 20. the teller mine while powerful is to bulky. in my opnion tellers should be reduced to 320 damage and and cost 35 ammo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: video of how broken shocks are.6 Feb 2014, 21:50 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2014, 21:38 PMKatitof I can agree on the bitter part. But both here and on official forums are many worse then me. At least I'm not one faction only hero like 90% of these armchair balance experts here. i cannot think of anybody worse then you currently. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: sniper / guards rifle6 Feb 2014, 15:16 PM one of the main reasons i want guards moved to cp 2 as the shocks. counters do exist but they come way to late and it gives soviet a rahter huge advantage early game In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SNF Tiger Ace news1 Feb 2014, 08:37 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jan 2014, 16:47 PMPingPing Given the strength of the overall "Commander" - G43's, Smoke and Insta Vet - they should just make the Tiger Ace a regular Tiger call in with NO gimmicky options (to both the Tank AND the resource income). That way if you WANT that triple Vet Tiger - you have to spend more to do it. Have the Tiger cost the same as the Commanders and be done with it. Even WITH this change I still think this is the strongest Commander going. A normal tiger? you want this doctrine even more OP? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shocks more powerful on the move?1 Feb 2014, 08:34 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jan 2014, 17:44 PMferrozoica I believe Thompsons and STG44's just had 25% reduced accuracy, they weren't more accurate. MP40's were still 50% reduced on the move 80% even for the mp40's but i beleive it was compensated with more bullets when on the move In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SNF Tiger Ace news27 Jan 2014, 21:10 PM I wonder if they are going to change the cp for the tiger ace now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34-76 after patch24 Jan 2014, 06:54 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2014, 22:42 PMKatitof And I find it disturbing how many german only players believe that soviets can have T3 and T4 in one game unless it lasts 50+ minutes. If you've went for strat that involves T3, then he will not have T4. "Just using T4" is also no solution. Its extremely boring and extremely map dependent, unless you want to return to times where it was all about guards+M3 snipers to SU-85 spam, because I certainly don't. the enitre faction is build around its commander + a cerain tier. You dont understand how your faction works then? Your commander is supposed to be either AI or AT to fill the gap. right now their is no gap just stacking of AI units like shocks with t-34 and still win despite the lack of stratergy or combined arms because of ram. In my opinion ram should not work with any unit that has heavy crush. if you have shocks and t-34's out you should lose when the tiger or panther arrives because should punis you for your lack combined arms and planning. instead we see soviets win that would be a los for the germans. just spam p'4 and wait how that works when the is2 arrives or even the kv1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34-76 after patch23 Jan 2014, 22:25 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Jan 2014, 17:17 PMKatitof Get used to it. Its not going anywhere as long as best T3 unit have 80 penetration. use tier 4 then. i find it a bit disturbing how many soviet players beleive that one tier should solve all problems. the enitre faction is build around its commander + a cerain tier. i expect osme combined arms and skill from te soviet player to knock out a german heavy and not a spammable all rounder. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the STUG truly useless??21 Jan 2014, 18:06 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jan 2014, 22:05 PMCieZ From personal experience and from unit stats. As I said before the stug is better AT than a p4 in every regard, and it out ranges t34s, if your stugs aren't beating t34s, you're doing it wrong. :/ No the soviet player is doing it wrong. that the stug is a better AT unit is without question but you using the stug against an unit that is very capable of flanking and killing a stug. with respect considering the mobility of the p4 i consider the p4 a far better AT tank when dealing with the t-34's In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the STUG truly useless??19 Jan 2014, 21:11 PM Stug is significantly better AT than a P4. It has longer range, higher RoF, higher penetration and does the same damage. Basically any game that I see a T-70 or T-34 I'll grab a Stug as my first tank because they completely hard-counter the hell out of T-34s Where did you get this idea from because the stug is far from a hardcounter to the t-34 even from the front. In: COH2 Balance