Profile of OZtheWiZARD

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1439

General Information


Thread: USF didn't need a mortar.10 Jul 2016, 14:15 PM USF mortar is broken. There is no doubt. Just wait for a fix. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Make Ostheer lategame great again!9 Jul 2016, 16:50 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2016, 16:09 PMsinthe I agree the need some love for their early game, but that has to be balanced with their late gave power. Comets>panthers, cromwell > p4, a pair of fireflies > heavy armour. I am not sure in terms of stats but from my own experience Panther can take on a Comet and vice versa, PzIV can take on a Cromwell and vice versa. Firefly is a gimmick tank. I don't use them unless forced. Can't really say a lot but they are very fragile and fire slow. Something with high RoF like JgdPz IV or StuG III should be able to fight it pretty reliable. Provided you can dodge Tulip. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Make Ostheer lategame great again!9 Jul 2016, 15:48 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2016, 15:38 PMAradan IS can stand versus MG, and with T1 Brit will make own MG, if need. Problem is, British early game is extremely weak due to high cost of units. Both IS and Vicker HMG cost 280 mp. HMG on carriage comes way too late and therefore without HMG from base building British would have been destroyed early game each time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Make Ostheer lategame great again!9 Jul 2016, 14:53 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2016, 12:16 PMAradan Axis dont need late game buff. No more unballanced team games (3v3 and 4v4), when Elephant (JagdTiger) overturned all game. What Ost only need is T0 MG exclusivity. Lets remove Brits MG from T0. if you remove Brits HMG from T0, how do you expect them to not fall back beyond salvage early game? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry5 Jul 2016, 18:38 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2016, 17:47 PMmycalliope if we are to go by relic's description of units then lol... Who else's? Yours? Are u kidding me? Are you guys really that arrogant you know better than developer itself? I understand they may be a bit lost sometimes when it comes to balance tweaks but they design these units and they sure know what kind of role they are supposed to have. What's more, when that's not the case they fix or change it as we could have observed in the past. I swear sometimes I read the nonsense some of you produce and I start to understand Katitof's approach. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry5 Jul 2016, 17:27 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2016, 16:49 PMZyllen No im cracking down on intellectually dishonest allied fanboys like yourself. your arguments are shit period. I already asked you why the owk should have the weakest mainline infantry support weapons and lv's. you couldn't answer and you still cannot because you know its true. This whole description issue is something i put an end to because its nothing more then a huge strawmen that you created. I provided you with proofs and supported my valid claims, you got nothing expect for childish arrogance. You want to take you seriously? Support your claims with some evidence. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry5 Jul 2016, 13:51 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2016, 13:27 PMZyllen I never seen such a massive hissy for over the description of units. also oz thats some pretty fucking outdated info you got their. the VG;s didnt just get buffed or nerfed their entire role got changed. so any info previously before the swap from shreks to mp44 is no longer relevant. I never made this fuss in the first place and these are few of the last changes made to Volks. Also my point was to show the design philosophy rather than adjustments it selves. That is literately Relic saying what was their aim yet you still are going to argue that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry5 Jul 2016, 13:11 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2016, 10:54 AMinsaneHoshi No it says that they are effective infantry. Which clashes with your reality where you believe they should be ineffective. BTW im still waiting for you to find any sort of proof that they are meant to be ineffective. In regards to Volks durability: Volksgrenadiers The received accuracy bonus the Volksgrenadiers gained at Veterancy level 5 made them extremely durable. Durability was not one of the intended roles of the squad so adjustments were made. Removed 0.71 received accuracy at veterancy level 5 Added 0.7 cooldown and reload at veterancy level 5 Link Volksgrenadiers Performs moderately well at long range combat Extremely vulnerable at short range, moderately vulnerable at mid-range Versus Riflemen Disadvantaged at long ranges Extremely disadvantaged at short-mid ranges Versus Conscripts Advantaged at long ranges Disadvantaged at mid ranges Disadvantaged at short ranges Changes Mid accuracy from 0.6 to 0.62 Far accuracy from 0.55 to 0.59 Moving cooldown from 1 to 1.5 Link These are just few I found going through patch notes alone In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW in Multiplayer is Weak!5 Jul 2016, 09:28 AM No, it's just you. When you meet a decent player it actually is much harder to win, especially on urban maps. It's only former Volks blowers who struggle and I've to admit it's enjoyable to watch. In particular when they're trying to blob with SP and get obliterated. You can read it on this forum: T-34 2 shot my SP squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Infantry5 Jul 2016, 09:16 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2016, 01:34 AMinsaneHoshi You do know thats exactly how they are described in game too? Im still waiting your source saying Volks are supposed to be fragile. This description refers also to fresh recruits and recovered wounded soldiers. Sure, that's a clear indicator Volks should be elite infantry. Volksgrenadiers basically means Conscripts. Historically and in game. Watch any official stream or even study the patch notes on the official website. Pay attention to what kind of changes were introduced. In: COH2 Balance