Profile of OZtheWiZARD

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1439

General Information


Thread: AEC Armored Car4 Oct 2015, 16:58 PM I'd find some use for it from time to time, problem is, a Bofor is a much better investment most of the time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis Heavy 4 Oct 2015, 16:56 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Oct 2015, 12:14 PMCorsin The 2nd and 4th post of this topic... is a pretty good example of the reason why the game is in such a poor state of balance. Because sadly these kinds of people get listened to, far too often. While i dont think that replay is a good example of how Allies are over performing Axis. (they were flanked ect)... But generally yeah, Allies > Axis in terms of balance. I'd say an outcry to buff perfectly fine units because people don't know how to utilize them is a bigger reason them my vague answer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry section reinforcement cost.4 Oct 2015, 16:52 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Oct 2015, 15:09 PM_GarbageMan_ With ISG's one shotting the squads, I think they should be cheaper. That's problem with ISG not Infantry Section. Don't change what ain't broken. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits Morta Pit slightly expensive?4 Oct 2015, 16:51 PM I don't build them atm because there is no point in current meta. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis Heavy 4 Oct 2015, 12:05 PM No, they don't need a buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry section reinforcement cost.4 Oct 2015, 11:56 AM Not so sure about that. I mean yes it is high at the beginning but then again in the late game with 5th man, veterancy and double Bren (or whatever is the lmg called) Infantry Section is a very powerful unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British Anvil Churchill, and my thoughts.3 Oct 2015, 18:21 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2015, 17:11 PMAlexzandvar If you fixed the fact it has double the acceleration of every other heavy tank in the game, the ability to throw satchel charges at people with shock troop grenade timers, and the fact it has twice as much health as a KV1 you wouldn't need to limit it. The ultimate insult to injury is it vet's up very fast and it's gun has better accuracy than a PIV's, so it's essentially got zero flaws. Will you stop this gardening acceleration nonsense? Does that help Churchill to be a fast tank? Nope! It's still a slow moving vehicle, hence it does not matter! Every fast tank goes faster than Churchill after 0.4 second. Thanks God for that "acceleration". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Those stupid leiG spam3 Oct 2015, 07:52 AM Can we not have this off topic discussion here please? I've told you what I know and how statistics work. It's mathematics and the rules are quite strict and established by people way smarter than you or me. This is how it works. Big sample - accurate results, small sample - lottery. Also sample needs to be uniformly equal. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Elite Infantry and some other Issues3 Oct 2015, 07:44 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2015, 23:09 PMZyllen I didnt say that. I said the requirements are beyond reason. Talking about it is pointless without hard data anyway. And i dont give a fuck what you do with you puma or any other of your claims. Not giving a fuck is a right attitude to have in a discussion. This will achieve plenty for you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British Anvil Churchill, and my thoughts.3 Oct 2015, 07:38 AM This topic is in regards to big team games isn't? I haven't seen 3 Churchills in 1v1 or 2v2 game even once. If that's the case there was nothing stopping you from getting a Panther and 2 PaK each or even better Panther and a StuG each to counter them. Why are we even going with this? I understand Croc but regular Churchill got nothing but its HP pool. You take this and there is nothing left. Don't start with this "the best acceleration" bullocks became it's nonsense. It's a slow tank and this suprime acceleration doesn't change that. In: COH2 Balance