Profile of Cardboard Tank

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 978

General Information


Thread: Open Beta first impressions22 Oct 2014, 23:49 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 19:36 PMrezzzzen The inability to play as soviets and ostheer was resolved, i just played a game with soviets vs OKW How so? Ostheer is buttfucked with pioneer and Pak nerf. Added to that Bars seem to be able to run directly into MG42s again. If anything, Ostheer is harder to play now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Open Beta Changelog22 Oct 2014, 10:05 AM I can´t find call-ins in this changelog. That was one of the biggest issues for dull meta imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Open Beta Changelog22 Oct 2014, 09:43 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 09:41 AMarmatak Build 2, problem solved Even pre patch two or three of them - even when covering each other - would get overwhelmed in 2v2s if there were enough medium tanks - which were always there. Now it´s even worse. Combine that with the Schreck nerf and you have seriously crippled Ostheer AT. OKW was op, not Ostheer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Open Beta Changelog22 Oct 2014, 09:39 AM RIP Pak40. Welcome medium tank spam versus Ostheer! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's talk about the P-47 anti-tank Rocket Strike21 Oct 2014, 17:18 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2014, 15:16 PMQueenRatchet123 not the best fighter plane in ww2 Best interceptor. Fighter plane isn´t fighter plane. Best escort would be Mustang, best dog fighter the Spitfire. Best low altitude plane would be FW-190. On topic: The rocket strike can be avoided but it´s as annoying as blizzards. If you can avoid it, it pauses any tank movement for the next 2 mins. And that´s boring. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing Madness18 Oct 2014, 20:27 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2014, 16:30 PMacosn Nope. Relic claimed they wanted to make an "authentic" WW2 experience. We have Su-85s with more range than a Panther, because there´s a sticker on the vehicle that says "tank destroyer". I think we can screw realism. Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2014, 19:00 PMMr. Someguy Authentic ≠ Realistic This. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: It's time to nerf OKW late game8 Oct 2014, 17:24 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Oct 2014, 15:19 PMAvNY It's no wonder they won the war. What kind of shit argument is that? In a war of attrition you can have the better stuff but get outnumbered and lose. Best MG of the war: MG42 Best handheld AT: Panzerfaust Best tank: Arguably the Panther Best SPG: StuG Some people here will only be quiet if T-34s reliably beat Panthers etc... Someone has to have a late game advantage. It has always been the Germans in Coh1 and it was no problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Blitz ability too good?5 Oct 2014, 14:02 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2014, 11:01 AMzingfreelancer I don't know if you are correct, I suggest you read up on panther tank wiki page, you might get as shocked as I was. That is the infamous D variant, with issues the A and G variants (the ones produced in more significant numbers and those who we see in-game) didn´t face. Believe it or not: Tigers were actually reasonably reliable when maintained correctly. As the war went on however that became more difficult. The best "tank" of the war is actually the StuG. It was the backbone of the German armored force and despite a conventional design its gun and small silhouette as well as the production cost made it perform exceptionally well before the German army collapsed totally and they were used as tank-substitutes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What new Soviet unit do you want to see in CoH2?30 Sep 2014, 16:01 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 15:50 PMBrachiaraidos Jagdtiger + King Tiger + Tiger ace + Stuka = A-Okay ISU + SU-100 = OMG CHEESE Someone has a bit of a bias problem Seems to be you. Note how in that equation there´s no Ostheer unit but the Tiger ace (which again not everybody has). The King Tiger and TA don´t have 70 range like it´s demanded on the SU-100. Neither do they oneshot squads to the extend of an ISU. Just imagine Germans got an ISU added to their JT... it would be shit in multiplayer. The same thing as Allies shouldn´t get a super range AT tank. Super range AT + Super range AI in one team = gg. In: Lobby
Thread: What new Soviet unit do you want to see in CoH2?30 Sep 2014, 15:44 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 13:24 PMBeinhard Asking for a balanced and legitimate unit as the Su 100 to help countering the JT,Ferdi, KT. Germoni needs another balance breaker to continue the trend. Logic™ be gone Why not 60 range? Oh, yeah, German units aren´t supposed to fire back. You just want more cheese for that faction. You are claiming ISU-152s are under-performing... You aren´t willing to see the possible synergy in team games from ISU-152s and Su-100s with that range... I made my point clear and I´m out of here. Soviet only players and their cheese. In: Lobby