Profile of Cardboard Tank

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 978

General Information


Thread: What new Soviet unit do you want to see in CoH2?25 Sep 2014, 15:30 PM Funny thing is that the current SU-85 already is like a SU-100. It can penetrate Tigers and Panthers on a regular basis. They could just change the skins. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic: Rebuff the 34/7621 Sep 2014, 10:47 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2014, 18:00 PMArclyte SU-85s are far from useless, they just need a mobility + turn rate buff I still shudder thinking about the times the SU-85 could just reverse and was almost as fast as the tanks trying to chase it, making it futile to pursue. And on some maps like Semoiski it was untouchable. I´d prefer a cost decrease. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A historical comparison in the Game20 Sep 2014, 20:07 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2014, 17:29 PMAirborne Ram means now only you lose a t-34, giving with luck the enemy eniging damdge. I agree ram is useless. But it was a plague before the nerfs. Best thing would be imo to just stun both tanks. It would be like target weak point, just that it would also stun the T-34 for some time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's talk Soviet faction.20 Sep 2014, 16:27 PM I think Conscripts could go down to 220 mp and one pop cap less. I don´t think giving them DPs would be a good idea because then they would be too close to Grens in design. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New thought on WFA vehicle balance - repairing20 Sep 2014, 13:34 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2014, 13:23 PMAirborne 81mm> 82mm 204mm isn't equel than the OH howie, the 152mm is. Priest is a cool unit, but stuka works better for it's cost. Every static artillery is useless as soon as the opponent has a doctrine with a recon aircraft and some off map strike, which in a 2v2 is probably around 80% anyways (it´s enough if one has a recon aircraft in a doc and the other one has offmap strikes). :/ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A historical comparison in the Game20 Sep 2014, 12:11 PM In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger ACE current condition19 Sep 2014, 21:08 PM Is it really just a vet 3 Tiger now? Iirc it has the health of the Tiger pre-nerf and a bit better MGs. That being said: I still prefer regular Tigers over it. The lower mp cost and no crippled fuel income are better than paying the manpower for a Tiger ace. Even the fuel cost of the regular Tiger is worth it. I´m floating fuel every game anyway as German T3 is hardly viable and Panthers still perform a bit worse than Tigers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A historical comparison in the Game19 Sep 2014, 10:30 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2014, 03:15 AMcarloff You must check some german panzer officers order to Panters crews. Just for lulz about how "good" this "best" tank was. The orders were usually to keep the distance as it had thin side armor (I don´t know why people exclusively refer to that on the Panther as it is pretty much this way for most tanks). Especially in the battle of the bulge it didn´t reach its full potential as the environment was narrow and thus the sides were exposed easily. But on the far ranges in the east it was very hard to take down. It´s designed to be used that way. If deployed correctly it was a tactical nightmare to face. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Most requested unit in coh2 history...18 Sep 2014, 17:33 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2014, 17:24 PMQueenRatchet123 Did u really just? compare the maus to the pershing? Yup. Imagine seeing that in every game. Would suck... USF relied on medium tanks and only in the last weeks some Pershings fought around the Rhine region. Now imagine seeing that faction - which again, relied almost exclusively on medium tanks - getting a Pershing every game. With that vehicle almost every game the USF would jump a category higher with their tanks. The German equivalent of "jumping a category higher" would be the Maus. To be totally clear though: I fear that the weak US late game will never ever get fixed with a Pershing. Sure, then there´s the Pershing but that means it´s rather unlikely other things get fixed, like Jacksons or M4s. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Most requested unit in coh2 history...18 Sep 2014, 17:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2014, 17:16 PMQueenRatchet123 ?Why is there soo much hate for this unit? Imagine playing osth. and the best tank u have is a p4 It feels a bit like adding a Maus. Imagine facing that thing in 80% of the games. Destroys the feeling of the US faction which mainly relied on medium tanks and tank hunters. As I already said: The problem I see with USF currently is the lack of a decent medium tank outside a doctrine. In: COH2 Balance