Profile of rqd

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 65

General Information


Thread: Easy 8 is useless, should get some improvement.19 Sep 2019, 03:40 AM I would suggest make it a usf version commet, which has huge advantage over axis mediums. It can at least creat some late game diversity, now usf just keep building m36s. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My favourite change 19 Sep 2019, 01:56 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 22:33 PMT.R. Stormjäger And so much better to use. Love the 55 range. I’d actually be willing to pay 320 mp for a 60 range one. Then you may lose your fifth man and the extra firing arcbut it will be even better. In: Lobby
Thread: su76 need adjustments18 Sep 2019, 12:02 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 11:45 AMgbem The fact that we rarely see the su76 in tourneys and regular gameplay sorta indicates that this unit may not be in the best spot... the real question here isnt "should the su76 recieve some changes" but rather "what kind of changes does the su76 need"... this is in contrast to the puma or the stug which are a bit more common than the SU76 Outright AT buffs will mark the return of su76 spam... prolly a bad idea Id go with a cheaper barrage or rework barrage to an AI mode akin to sherman HE A rework on barrage is acceptable. Someone in this post have been trying to prove that su-76 is at its great spot of combining "decent" AT and "useful" barrage. I have to clearify that su-76 is not a good AT, like stug, which can hold off mediums nicely, and barrage with a recharge time of 80s can't really be handly like the one zis has. Imo a unit rarely used is bad, like old pgrens and ostwind. The balance team has been always making underused units playable, they should really do something to su-76. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is there so much crying over Maxim spam?18 Sep 2019, 11:45 AM In low level team games, there are ost players trying to fill any building on map with hmg42s. But usually they get mortared or flammed. Maybe is just axis players tend to ignore the existence of 251 with flammer or leig with smoke. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments18 Sep 2019, 11:33 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 10:59 AMVipper One is risking a 350/120 PzIV to kill a 280/75 fuel Su-76 the other is risking a 300/90 fuel T-34/76 to kill a 280/90 fuel Stug. The risk reward is much better in the second case... Yeah but obviously in most cases pz4 has greater chance of taking down a su-76 while t-34 struggles to fight stug. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments18 Sep 2019, 11:30 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 10:34 AMthedarkarmadillo I don't know if you know this but the su76 has 50 more range than a p4 and more mobility. If you are getting snared no amount reasonable buffs is going to make the su76 work for you. Yall are completely ignoring that it shoots out to 60 and almost never misses... LITERALLY ANY SUPPORT AT ALL GUYS THIS GAME IS ABOUT COMBINED ARMS... Or at least it's supposed to be... 50 more range? Seriously, you are not checking the numbers, su-76 has max range 60 while panzer4 is 40, it is 20 more range. And I was talking about failing to throw an AT nade to stop panzer4 from chasing your su-76 will have greater chance of losing your light TD than failing to faust a t-34 charging at stug. Not su-76 itself being snared. It is a combined arms game. But players make mistakes, if you failed to moniter on your su-76 you would get it easily killed. Take snipers as example, they excel at taking down models at range, but can be killed if not taking care of. Su-76 is good when shooting a range, as effective as snipers? No. Problem is that it is not worth it to keep operating a su-76, it is not rewarding. It can't hunt down lights like puma, but you must keep an eye on it to prevent it from danger, since it lacks hp and has a normal sight range. It was a "glass cannon" unit before. Now it is just glass, can't perform cannon's job, no one would like to use it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments18 Sep 2019, 10:20 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 09:56 AMVipper Fun facts: Panzer IV Speed: 6.3 Accel: 2.1 SU-76 6.3 Accel: 2.3 Su-76 has the same speed and better acceleration than PzIV. Stug T-34/76 Speed: 6.5 Accel: 2.3 STug-G Speed: 6 Accel: 2.1 A T-34/76 has better speed and acceleration than Stug So it actually easier to charge a Stug than a SU-76. In addition: Stug rotation 22 Su-76 rotation 32!!! So ti actually allot easier to flank a Stug than to flank a SU-76 And what's the risk? Igoring missing shots, t-34 charging stug has chances of deflect while stug is 100% to pen. Both of them has 640hp and 160dmg per shot and stug has better rof. Even if they stay in each other's range stug will probably win and if t-34 is snared it is done. Player with skills would hardly risk it. Pz4 charging at su-76 is to some extend, risk-free putting in the same senario. Don't get the point of this comparision. Stug's power will let people choose to flank it, but su-76 will be facing his foes upfront, since its power is not enough to scare them away. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments18 Sep 2019, 09:44 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 08:39 AMVipper It's penetration may have been lowered but its accuracy and rotation was buffed. It ROF was lowered in the same patch the Stug-G ROF was also lowered. A singe Su-76 with 20 range advantage over a PzIV should not be able to shut down it while it costs allot less. A single su-76 can't even repel a panzer4. Allied mediums won't get a stug by directly charging at it, but with a panzer4 charging at a su76, if the player failed to snare pz4 and reverse in time, then su76 is detroyed. The axis player could kill su-76 by exchanging shots since su-76 has low hp. And without a turret the terrible tracking system makes su-76 even harder to evade. I can't agree with your opinion that current vanilla su-76 can hold off wehr t3 mediums. If that's the case, those good 1v1 players won't go straight for 2 zis guns when his opponent rush for ostwind. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Kingtiger18 Sep 2019, 08:48 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 08:04 AMblvckdream IMO the only way to make KT and Tiger decent is to remove the extra pen SU85 and Jackson get with vet. There is no need for them to have 300+ penetration. If the KT bounced a few more shots it would already be very good. They don't have 300+ pen with vet. At range 60 vetted su-85 and m36 get 220*1.3=286 penertration. KT still deflects 1/5 of their shots. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su76 need adjustments18 Sep 2019, 03:22 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 02:55 AMdistrofio That is mainly the SU whole faction design. cost efficient Versatility. If the axis player is massing indirect fire (Pwerfer, mortars, Wstukas, leFh) instead of getting a Zis, you can simply get a Su76 for a little extra price. A fuel cost decrease should help to solidify this function. Su76 can not be a stug clone, because that a whole different faction, different design, different relative costs. Imagine the other way around, if stugs could barrage and were cheaper (but weaker), it would block allied armor and also infantry, that a lot of versatility that OST might need, yet they get a great medium TD with vet abilities focused on AT, stugs are not even used because allied factions rush for heavier tanks. Each faction gets balanced with advantages/restrictions. I enjoy su faction because their units always have multiple use, just as what your post suggests, so I don't want it to be stug clones. But in current state su-76 is hardly used due to its limited AT damage and superlong barrage recharging time. That why I think it needs adjustments, either increase its AT firepower through vet, like 160 damage with vet3 or make its barrage more handly, fewer shots, lower range but relatively shot recharge time. In: COH2 Balance