Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: vCoH Sound Effects Sounded Cooler and More Realistic14 Mar 2021, 05:23 AM the animations and physics were also better in some places in coh1. coh1 also had more complicated stats options to tweak remember when coh2 did not have bullet trails on launch? that is why i am not optimistic about coh3... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: KV112 Mar 2021, 11:48 AM iirc p4 had higher rear armor that allowed it to trade better against kv tanks sov was to complement their t34 su76 with kv tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Top level player allegedly maphacking in CoH2 12 Mar 2021, 06:55 AM seeking was reading this thread yesterday. why has he not post some sort of reply? In: Lobby
Thread: German Infantry Commander adjustments12 Mar 2021, 06:16 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2021, 00:44 AMFarlion Classic case of an unnecessary double nerf. Instead of taking away the issue (that they did too much damage while being very tough to kill), the balance team took away both. Since it's agreed their durability was too much, either return the G43 or boost the StG they get. Because if 5 Man Grens are useless, no one's going to pick this commander. well said, same thoughts! i never get the modders lust of usual double nerfs or double buffs to resolve meta issues i am thinking to remove storms and replaced with command p4 at the same command p4 cp this should give a more infantry synergy. a vet HT acts as forward reinforcement and a cp4 giving back some of the original VSL durability. there's no room for storms in this doctrine. if you look at shocks to is2 or rangers to pershing....a cp4 isn't any outlier! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: flank vehicles11 Mar 2021, 10:55 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 07:02 AMVipper Relic decided to create the role of "flanker" that is a simply fact and T-34/76 was designed with that role. If Relic implement that role correctly is another story. The current state of the T-34/76 is even yet another story since Relic has stop making designing the Patches a long time ago. I will not go into T-34/76 current performance since it irrelevant this topic. The fact remain that vehicles better of maintaining distance and vehicles that are better of closing the distance. yes there was a time relic designed the game as more individual units with specialist skills like many other games but over time of requesting standardization and reducing armor/(aka rng). things have clearly change In: Lobby
Thread: So how is the new Cromwell after an update?11 Mar 2021, 09:28 AM yes it is too good at vet levels. i could see a top player making a cromwell spam meta in time In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Top level player allegedly maphacking in CoH2 11 Mar 2021, 02:55 AM but the atg did fired at the brumbar earlier. he just got a lucky shot at the max possible range of attack ground at the most likely location and got lucky with rng splash? In: Lobby
Thread: Snare Inconsistency.3 Mar 2021, 09:21 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2021, 19:44 PMVipper I don't see as an issue. Higher HP/armor vehicles have a chance to avoid being snare so they actually benefit from their armor vs low tech mainline infantries. The only issue I see is not dying when reaching 0 HP. i agree with vipper. its only the 0 HP issue that needs a look at. otherwise i prefer to keep the different flavors. relic please help! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter 2021 Balance Patch - Discussion 28 Feb 2021, 04:19 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2021, 21:37 PMKatitof Except for the cost of all mobility you mean? It was perfectly find on preview and as far as I'm aware, it didn't got any scatter buffs since. why does it need mobility when it has durability and impossible to counter this early on? maybe in 1v1 preview nobody test it enough but team games its unplayable.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter 2021 Balance Patch - Discussion 28 Feb 2021, 04:04 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2021, 19:13 PMVipper Yes, it was like that in the preview and it was pointed out but they went ahead anyway... "Can now fire a Heavy Mortar Barrage up to range 150 once Hammer or Anvil have been unlocked. Heavy Barrage fires a total of 8 rounds into the target area with a 100 second recharge; affected by veterancy." "M1 81mm Mortar Cost from 240 to 230 Barrage scatter angle from 10 to 9 Distance scatter max from 8 to 7 Mobile Mortar Smoke (M21, 250 Half-Track, USF/British 81mm, Soviet 82mm, Ostheer 81mm)** To increase the effectiveness and responsiveness of smoke barrages, the speed at which they fire shells and rotate has been adjusted. Furthermore, smoke barrages will no longer share a cooldown with the primary barrage to allow players to have on-demand smoke. Infantry Mortar pivot time from 2 to 1.25 Smoke Barrage wind down from 2 to 0.375 Number of smoke shells per barrage from 3 to 4 Scatter bonuses at veterancy 3 no longer apply to smoke barrages Smoke Barrages no longer share a cooldown with the primary barrage" wow 150 range...what does affected by vet means? even faster recharge on vet... so fast pit + later bofors and atg protection... my okw trucks are sitting ducks ... and every 4v4 games is a smoke fest now...not sure if that is what you intended.... imo -lock the heavy mortar to emplacement commander and keep it at 100s recharge times and consider reduce range to 120.... -remove infantry mortar smoke wind down and shell per barrage buffs. back to 2 and 3 respectively. smoke fest is very one-sided for the initiator and the one at receving end cannot do shit, especially for ost a more static faction... it is like if you have early recon planes for free, just opposite of revealing sight...you block sight and breaks the tactical fun of FOW.... In: COH2 Balance