Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 14:45 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2019, 14:34 PMLoren The tanks mentioned in this article are all heavy class or equivalent tanks. And heavy class is, of course, difficult to penetrate. Thats the thing as spoken in this article at hand. Penetration of heavies IS tougher for Wehrboos. I cite another example that a Cromwell can hit Elefant with more pain than a P4 can hit a Croc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 14:39 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2019, 13:21 PMmrgame2 I say a lot of suggestions have been put out by concerned wehr users. I just thought of 1. Since armour skirts vet is pretty useless now, we should supplement that vet with added heat rounds for stug p4 and p5. For brumbar i think the armor vet sorta help and remains no change. For okw, perhaps the heat doctrine helps to reduce costs or recharge time More i think of this. More i like it as a quick fix. Sure Vipper have thrown more holstic suggestions with P4 and 60TD, i also made other suggestions. But at this stage, as spoken by sanders, Relic does not want more effort into the game. So a HEAT rounds seems like a good balance. We already see Okw perform with it and i doubt any objections to 'HEAT'. get "it" hehe In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 14:27 PM I also like to comment on some comments 1. oh panther, just use its speed and armor and do its tank hunter thing. Eh, yes after paying higher cost, but need to micro more. While allies 60TD can sit back, hit reverse, or pop-out crew repairs, hit ammo rounds, hit free sight. While costing less. And the fact blitz was complained so bad, it is becomes passive return, as long you dont get snared! So much work so much counters. Besides 320 more hp is not that much considering the risk vs rewards of staying in the fight against counters that pen and outrange you. 2. oh heavy armor allies, use elefant! elefant and JT are very map dependent, some maps you wont want elefant even if you need it. I will add ISU152 is less map dependent than those 2, and offers close-ish feelings to those casemates. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 14:18 PM Yes SU85 is simply more cost effective vs Tiger than Panther vs IS2. I check up coh2db for Tiger-IS2 dynamics. Ok so Tiger gun has faster reload, but its turret is 50% worse than IS2 at vet3. IS2 has 25% more armor. IS2 has higher pen than Tiger. I guess i should add Tiger to the op list! So SU85 pens Tiger on Vet. Panther needs more micro to pen IS2 despite paying a higher cost... The downer though, IS2 managed to see higher % increase for its vet status. Even the recent ability change helps! Tiger blitz is questionable after heavies speed nerf many moons ago... So just like my feelings from playing, Allies get better vet % stronger late game, and imo its down to the forgotton deposits, power creep perhaps of other attributes while keeping the older status buff. Oh yeah, dshk > mg2 pintle upgrade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 13:21 PM I say a lot of suggestions have been put out by concerned wehr users. I just thought of 1. Since armour skirts vet is pretty useless now, we should supplement that vet with added heat rounds for stug p4 and p5. For brumbar i think the armor vet sorta help and remains no change. For okw, perhaps the heat doctrine helps to reduce costs or recharge time In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 12:36 PM Interesting case of su85 tiger panther is2 dynamics. Surely we all agree su85 frightens tiger clearly more than the other way. At a lower costs as vipper mentioned of cost effectiveness In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 07:55 AM Little forgotten pieces such as ukf tank commander upgrade to comet/cromwell/FF. People were crying how bad vet 0 ukf tanks are, but forgotten the vet bonus and upgrades that boost critical performance greater In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 07:50 AM I won't call it 100% axis juice. More like those more familiar with the good and bad of Wehr and trying to bring up the forgotten brushed aside normals today. The point is allies AT were given much thoughts to counter axis heavy armor over time. So much so that a little forgotten pieces have deposited to Wehr AT in regards to pen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spotting scope vs commander sight 16 Oct 2019, 07:39 AM Different yes. I think the 222 get sight bonus on vet2? So spotting scope + vet is needed. I think same with elefant No doubt ss is... was.. pretty good to choose the doctrine. But yes also, the nerf seems too heavy and outta the blue. Tank commander is not as far seeing as spotting scope no doubt since its non doc. But it changes the equation when we talk about how poor/good ukf tanks are. I think compared to pintle, ukf gets the clearly better upgrade and again points to better allies late game suspicion and ingame i encountered In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr weak penetration16 Oct 2019, 06:54 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2019, 17:56 PMStug life fixed Thanks! I forgot that brumbar armor nerf. Somehow things get quicker against axis armor. Again the discussions we need to look at why the view that axis have such lower pen values still? Is a little more hp but against plenty of 160 standard damage or faster speed but lousier rotation rof or accuracy, or not enough relevant vet bonus? Do these older design choices not be reviewed just because Wehr is considered 'base template'? Yes unit composition, build order, availability, i don't deny Wehr is good faction. But Performance per cost per counters, have they kept up with all the changes? That's a no imo In: COH2 Balance