Profile of Balanced_Gamer

Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2019, 17:52 PMelchino7

I have a kinda unrelated suggestion.

What if all light vehicles, at least the ones which already has some sort of self repair at some point, would had it at vet0 and it would cost mp instead of munition?

Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2019, 15:17 PMSmiling Tiger

My point is that there are always multiple reasons for why a player wins a match, like you said, a unit is just another factor so the fact that somebody won using an AA halftrack doesn't mean it's a good unit, it means that the person using it knew what they were doing and had many other units at there disposal which they also used effectively.

I wasn't using the term "better player" to refer to top players, I was using it in it's literal sense. If two top level players play a match, the better player between the two is likely to win, sometimes even if they use a subpar unit.

No Conscripts wouldn't be competitive with my "theory" because conscripts are underpowered, however something being underpowered doesn't mean that they can't sometimes see some success when they are used by a very good player against a slightly worse or unlucky player.

For what reason do you think that mechanized builds are meta and are the more viable option between the two trucks? Shouldn't that mean that Battlegroupe is somewhat underpowered? After all, Battlegroupe is cheaper, comes earlier, gives access to medics, and gets you to T3 faster, so there must be something wrong if people want to go so far out of there way just to get a P2 or Puma.

I see it a lot like Soviet T2, it's a far less popular and successful tier because it has underpowered units (Maxim/AA Halftrack) and mediocre units (Soviet mortar/LeiG) and there is a much more effective alternative in the form of T1 for Soviets. Both factions have an effective tier and a largely ineffective tier.

Do you have any evidence that the people making these arguments are average at best, or is that just convenient for your argument?

Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2019, 15:09 PMSerrith

I would take an M5 with a quad any day over the FHT.

The armor on it is equal to an upgraded m20 which makes it quite vulnerable to small arms.
The inability to fire on the move is bad enough making it vulnerable to chase downs by anything that can fire on the move, the setup time just compounds the issue.

It is quite expensive fuel wise for its performance and utility(again, see m5 for comparison).


Some buff ideas (not necessarily all of them) -

-Reduction in recieved accuracy
-increase in armor
-Reduction in setup time
-Larger aoe, less damage per shot to make it easier to supress