Profile of Balanced_Gamer

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 783

General Information


Thread: Kubel needs changes2 Apr 2019, 12:43 PM Here are the changes it exactly needs if you guys want to keep Kubel the way it is, being able to cap and all. The following are - Increase Accuracy, Kurobane #41 stated its current stats in comparison to Universal Carrier - Give it an upgrade option or 2 (or more, give out your ideas please) . To make it cost more for more performance, everyone likes that, wants that, WE NEEDS IT PRECIOUS. - Upgrade 1> is HMG, removes ability to cap, has to setup before it suppresses, setup time 2-3 sec, takes 30-50% less damage. Performs similarly to Maxim, better or worse. Guess we will have to see. - Upgrade 2> MG42, increase rate of fire, bursts and accuracy over distance. More aggro style, possible Cap removal. - Decrease Veterancy requirments. It is ridiculous currently, Kurobane #41 stated it also - Decrease Target Size, currently gets damaged too frequently, still vulernable to small arms but should be reduced or become less vulnerable than it currently is. - To balance, upgrades become only accessible when an HQ is built, Or Can build upgrades anytime like Universal Carrier does. What you guys think about this for balancing? Then we can decide on nerfing Volks versatility. Discuss on this forum instead "https://www.coh2.org/topic/88296/revamp-volksgrenadiers-terms-of-versatility-okw"; If it performs better (depending of course how good the changes are) when changed, buff its price to around 240-250 manpower. Upgrades costing range from 40 - 70 ammo, would be great. Gives the Kubel some appreciation plz! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Kubel needs changes2 Apr 2019, 10:34 AM Yes, that is why I believe it requires adjustments also. I appreciate the effort Kurobane. Exactly what you have said, "This would make the Kubelwagon an option, at the moment you are better off using that manpower on something else more useful which is why you see the typical 3 Volks opening." Currently it is ridiculous to use because of how useless it is in many situations. Sturmpios and Volks are better combined overall, not Kubel. Check what I have suggested #38, may be the thing it needs. In MG mode should take less damage also, still vulnerable to small firearms but reduction in damage around 30-50% would be nice. Remove Cap. It should be more AI focused. This will make the unit more unique (in a fixed proper manner) than it currently is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamp Volksgrenadiers terms of versatility OKW2 Apr 2019, 09:23 AM Do you guys think that this will balance out the power, distinguish it between the two units Sturmpio and Volks instead of 1 unit "Volksgrenadiers" being the most heavily dependant, versatile, cost effective and reliant unit as it currently is? It will cost them more than now. Volks will not be as versatile in many situations as before. Sound good thus far. Focus it between the two units according to the different situations. Not just choose volks because they simply adapt in many different situations. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Little idea of OKW unit training and Salvage commander2 Apr 2019, 09:13 AM I like the Obers idea best where they become accessible in Command HQ after building 2 of any bases. Seems fair and square if you ask me because if the player went for instance for both medic and mechanized base first, they will sacrifice PzHQ for better tanks much later on, for better infantry units earlier instead. Seems like this is a great idea. Jadgpanzer idea is good too. Accessible when Panzer HQ deployed, but when destroyed still accessible but it will only be the AT vehicle choice available, no Panther and no PanzerIV available if the PzHQ is destroyed. Sounds great. Ostwind by default in PanzerHQ would be great. OKW does not have late AI vehicle choices late game. They mainly have Luchs which does not scale that well late game. I like the idea, it creates more gaps and openings. Opportunities also. Should the cost of KT then be made higher for these changes to apply? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Kubel needs changes2 Apr 2019, 08:34 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2019, 06:19 AMdistrofio Kubel now its not even a meme anymore. Even USF is getting their shit together and its most likely this suggestion will never make into the game. Old kubel was a MOBILE suppression platform like current so much more used USF Flak HT, M5 Quad, Centaurs for allied. Its older design was bad because only inf was present and only kubel was able to suppress on the move, no AT to stop him. What i said is kubel has to set up and become immobile like OST 250s to get some suppression effect, its goint to require MICRO and good decision making since setting it up should take some seconds. It could have a maxim like performance to begin with I agree with what you have stated. It should be stationary or setup before it can suppress. Mobile Suppression would make it OP, so it is a NO for that. Make it like the Wehrmacht Doctrinal Sdkfz 250 Half Track where it has to setup before it suppresses. That would be great. To actually make use of this unit rather than a useless unit which it currently is. It is hardly adaptable in many situations. Vet is a problem because of its current requirements and lacking performance. It would do fine if it performed better! Make unit cost more to 250 manpower. Buff it, it requires certain changes. Remove cap. Take Detection ability vet 1 away for Self-Repair costing 10-15 ammo instead. The unit has to be more of a combat unit rather than scout unit which it is currently terrible at. That is what it needs. To be used more often, be made a viable choice, to serve an actual purpose. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are there actually more units deep into game files ?1 Apr 2019, 20:52 PM I think there was a special unit called "Storm Elite", supposed to be doctrinal. Here is the picture In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poll: is the Ostwind underpowered?1 Apr 2019, 20:38 PM It needs to be fixed. Accuracy is its main problem. It seems to shoot behind the squads most of the times. The buffs that I believe it should recieve is one of the following Option 1> Buff Accuracy, AOE Option 2> Buff Accuracy, Rate of fire, faster reload speed Option 3> Buff Damage, Accuracy One of these options would be great I believe. Currently, it does not perform as it should. "Hardly used" to "Can be used". That is what it needs. Which option do you think it needs? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Revamp Volksgrenadiers terms of versatility OKW1 Apr 2019, 20:08 PM Here are the nade changes I believe would be great. Volks will instead a steihandgranate like the Panzerfusiliers have. Sturmpio has another option, flamethrower upgrade. This will make Volks less reliant as they are, to spread out across these two units according to situations at hand. Another aspect of seeing this as not OP is because Sturmpio will have 3 options - Pzshrek AT - Hazard Removal Package (Mine checking) - Flamethrower (AI aggression) - Have access to concussive grenade vet 2 (or 1) instead of vet 3. There will be a difficult dilemma for Sturmpio because they would have to decide to sacrifice 2 of the 3 things, depending on the situation and scenario. Volks will have access to - MP40 upgrade (mp40s currently are not the greatest, should be adjusted) for close range - MG42 or MG32 upgrade long range purposes - Normal Grenade - Have the Panzerfaust only with "long ranged upgrade" - Have Firenade only with MP40 upgrade Another dilemma, decrease their overall all round efficiency. Upgrade will decide whether you will lose Panzerfaust or Firenade. These are not all my final ideas. Still processing what would be the best changes for revamping Volks overall. These are my idea thus far. Anybody else got any other ideas? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Kubel needs changes1 Apr 2019, 19:52 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2019, 19:02 PMBananenheld kubel is so fine, no1 builds it. the reason for this is volks being OP. conclusion: nerf volks!!1 I posted this forum on how we should deal with Volks versatility. It is quite versatile, may require some changes. Balance it out between the units Volks and Sturmpio, not Volks having everything. "Revamp Volksgrenadiers terms of versatility OKW" https://www.coh2.org/topic/88296/revamp-volksgrenadiers-terms-of-versatility-okw Check it out. Hopefully you can give idea on how to deal with their versatility. Some nerfs volks. Hopefully help improve the Kubel (change enitrely) and Luchs (improve accuracy slightly, on move particularly) for the changes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Kubel needs changes1 Apr 2019, 19:00 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2019, 18:56 PMthedarkarmadillo sturms can easily repair it whil capping, soemthing they should be doing anyways. sturms also repair quite fast. it takes literal seconds to repair and the combo can easily take enough ground to be worth those seconds. i feel a little silly here having to explain the basics im not going to lie. all units have down time when they take damage, infantry and vehcles. the kuble has the power to make up for that down time by being far more mobile than most things in its time and the only of such that can cap and fight. you repair after you pushed the enemy off. its fairly basic really... . How often will you have to repair then. Every minute because it sustains a lot damage therefore requiring much time from Sturmpio to repair, it takes a lot of time. You have to keep Kubel behind when it has sustained damage, depending whether or not Sturmpio is engaging or retreating, it will take time. It could mean that you lose the aggressiveness early. So, it is not all possible as it seems. In: COH2 Balance