Profile of Balanced_Gamer

I think 222 should only get smoke option for when you get the Flamethrower upgrade. I think it is fair since an investment in 90 should mean something. Especially its lacking durability. Smoke should cost 30 ammo or less.

I think that would be fair since many allied light vehicles do have smoke. Only OKW FHT has smoke and Puma. Wehrmacht has none by default. I think 222 should at least have smoke when upgraded!!

Does anyone want to nerf versatiliy of Volks to balance as like I have mentioned comment 39 & 40.

In turn for making Luchs performing better or as least as good as T70 against infantry only specifically (which performs currently worse overall). Make supressive ability come earlier, to at least vet 2 or 3. Vet 5 is ridiculous. I can emphasise more if needed.

Kubel needs adjustments. Mentioned on "Kubel needs changes" forum and Veterancy adjustments needs to be looked over. MG34 needs a little more suppression (can emphasise more if needed). Leig18 needs some kick which is does not, the least AOE of all mortars, nobody usually takes it (can emphasise more if needed).

I feel if these things are fixed, there will no longer be problems experienced by anybody playing as any allied faction especially playing as OKW.

Are there going to be fixes? Does anyone know?

I think here is simple adjustment for Grens.

Hardly anyone uses medit unless it is a huge a map and big team games.


Grens should have at instead vet 1 or default ability (like tommies have behind cover)slight Accuracy bonus when behind cover.

or

Grens have vet 1 or default (like tommies have behind cover) Focuses fire on a model while behind cover. (Grens "concentrate fire", focuses one model to two models at a time).


They are a defensive unit. It would make sense for them in some way to excel in defense rather than Infantry Section being able to adapt both aggressiveness and defensiveness with Rate of Fire boost behind cover which is very strong.

Even then 4 models vs 6 models. Theoretically, there is a chance the 6 man squad, 2 of their models are likely to concentrate on one model of Grens, therefore higher possibility of losing. Grens vs 6 guys where their aim is focused spread out more across 6 models, what are their chances of 2 on one of the 6. So it takes them longer to get models.

This is fair if Grens get vet 1 Concentration Fire only when behind cover. Focuses on 1 to 2 model at a time.

Even 5 models have better chances than 4. As one of there would 2v1 models, thus 4 man higher prob of losing model faster.



This would be good enough I would say, buff price to 250 manpower.

They will still be 4 man, it should not be a problem for them to have this as compensation.

i laugh everytime when i see an OKW player build his schwerer outside from base sector..its so easy these days to destroy it....thats why i recommend: DONT BUILD IT OUTSIDE THE BASE.


i played with rank 70 player...which build it everytime outside in 2v2...every game he lost it...sometime twice!!! i hurts my brain so hard...

I do laugh too when moments like this occurs when I am playing as an allied player. The thing is, it is bound to be destroyed with their access to Artillery etc.

It is not fun being the victim on the other hand when you can not do anything against arty abilities against your base as an OKW playre. If it does have base structure, it would be great but it does not. It is weaker than Bofors overall for several reasons, Brace Structure for, it does not have.

Second, You can not decide who to attack with that base. In theory, you can charge with the T34 or T70 as bait, then bring 2 or 3 Penals, place Satchel boom, Penals left untouched and there goes the base.

Of course a scenario like this hardly occurs because usually a good player would support it.

Lastly is its cost when you lose it. It should have a substantial decrease in price when you get it for the second time or Jagdpanzer idea to make it balanced.

I am sure you can agree on that fact?