What game are you playing where zooks are effective versus heavy tanks? These aren't Panzershreks we're talking about; bazookas struggle even against Panzer IVs.
Off-map? P-47 Rocket Strafe is good, but you're not going to be able to build an AT defense around it.
Mines? USF only has stock access to the RE M7 light mine; 80 damage and a quick stun. There's the heavy M6 mine, but it's 60 munitions each and only produceable by the M20. Your opponent is going to know what you're doing if he sees one pop up 20 minutes into a game lmao.
This leaves an AT gun wall as the only option other than the Jackson, and once youve dumped the ~810 manpower and ~21 popcap required to make that tactic work it's probably time already for them to get fucked by rocket artillery, obers or stormtroopers. Allied ATGs dont get TWP either so you'll have to be playing against someone ballsy or retarded enough to get satchel charged or already eat enough damage for an infantry snare to work if you want to kill anything without blitzing away first.
If the Pack Howitzer was so much to bitch about on the basis of it's uniqueness, you really have to wonder why the Panther gets a free pass. Your Panzer IVs and Stug AGs wouldnt be useless if Allies actually produced medium tanks instead of the Jackson/TDs, but its already been established that this is what you have to do in order to stop axis heavy armor, which Axis in return have plenty of capability to stall towards, having no such difficulties with stock allied armor aside from maybe the Churchill.
Not everyone has teller mines or shreks, man.
1. maybe u flank with zooks or get to rear of the Tanks.
2. WHuut ? watch some 2v2 replay pls. this this p 47 strave is the "get out of jail card"
i said combiend arms so "No u dont Inf spam an than hit one button to win the game" may buld paks and mines and inf with zooks.
3. and tellars cost 0 ? maybe mine and than bring a pak in and hit the super ammo.
Y-yyes he exactly know where u are drop a mine... sure.
4. no not a wall just "combiend" arms. but hey this requiers micro and i know its hard when u just can build one unit to counter them all... with super speed and acc on the move and super ling range and self heal ... why should some go for combiend arms when u can just win with that super tank.
5. No its not ... its just the easy way ... the no brainer.
i think its time to nerf panther by increasig its coast and "hold on" change jackons with M10
u will never have a proper medium play when US just can hardcounter any Tank in the game with 0 effort.
That is, the axis player can play with heavy tanks, and the USF player must defend with mines and a paks with the worst penetration? It also requires munition costs to increase penetration. Yes, you want an easy game too.
"in 1v1 and 2v2 u just NEVER see a JT or an Elefant" - lie.
maybe u just play axis if u want heavy tanks(wich get countered even before theyre hit the field). . i cant do anything about the US Tank doctine in ww2... wich is basicly "zergrush" with Tanks to fight inf and TD to fight Tanks.
hmm yes.. because theyre designd as "breakthrough" or "longrange" Tank Hunter
economy wise its ike " hmm we have less resources so our Tanks must be better because we cant afford much of them" ... this goes down to the accessibility of oil.. but thats another story.
no idont want an easy game .. but now the normal "game" is US Inf blobb into jackson. A+ blobb move tactics
hmm than maybe jump with mp40 and u can buy 2x FG42 and 3 K98k for long and med range.
5 Man with better FG42 behind enemy lines is too strong. Its like paradrop shocks
I dont like 5x FG42, because than they are just 5 Man Pgrens with better slighty better weapons.
And u have a dps drop of... even with 5 Man. The Main Firepower must come from the 2 FG42.
Than they got the same durability as the standart rifles + bar.
Why not the vet5 drop ?
the 3rd weapon slot would make them more flexible.
I specifically made this picture, brought the numbers and percentages, so that it would be clear to every dissatisfied axis player that Jackson is not subject to any discussion. All for objectivity. M36 is the only measure against heavy axis tanks.
but why ? u have also Paks and mines and u can equip all inf with zooks and offmap if u want too.
maybe u just have to develop a combiend arms tactic.
And not the standart infs spam into Jacksons ...where 0 micro is required.
in 1v1 and 2v2 u just NEVER see a JT or an Elefant.
U see only panthers in axis lategame because it is the only stock Tank that is not useless when it hits the field.
5 Man with A.Gren. MP-40s
Stormtrooper RA
440 MP
x5 FG-42 (Which will have similar DPS total as the current one maybe a tiny bit more) for 120 munitions
With x5 FG-42's DPS drop-off will not be that much drastical.
While 5th man and Stormtrooper RA will solve survivability issues without making it ridicilously OP.
MP-40s will prevent paradrop rapes unlike current FG-42s.
And lastly with upgrade and unit that expensive it will be punishing to spam/blob.
Seems fair imo.
pls no.
3cp
5 Man with k98k
Stromtrooper RA
450 MP
1x FG42 for 60 mun (max. 2x FG42 Unit) a bit better than BAR or a bit worse than OberMG
3 Weapon slots
Faust @vet0
bobytrap @vet0
Blend @vet1
cammo @vet2
selfheal @vet3
RA,dmg, acc buff @vet4
reinforce in the field via paradrop @vet5
there u have ur "elite" Unit wich not getting insta wipe by any nade.
The main problem with currant Fallis is the dps drop via model, in combo with the 4man splash/nade/ insta wipe.
1. 1cp smokeplane 30 mun
2. 2cp fortifications + forward HQ like SU
3. 3cp Fallis 450 mp
4. 8cp Close air stuka (from Ost)120
5. 12cp 50 kg Stuka (from ost)
And now let us remember that the valiant Aryans copied from the Untermenche:
12-cm Granatwerfer 42 - direct copy of the Soviet PM-38.
8 cm Raketen-Vielfachwerfer - a copy of the Soviet 80-mm missiles and BM-8-24
G43 - based on SVT-40
RSO - based on the layout scheme of the Soviet transport tractors STZ-5 and Stalinets-2
this vid is rly funny.
So lets begin....
The soviets capture a "stg44 precursor" and they think .. well we need our own weapon system.
With the same boundary conditions as the stg 44... midlle cartige etc.
And the wonderboy Kalashnikov, who had no to less experience as a weapon desinger, designed the best small arms in history of mankind.... SURE. His pre work, this tank crew weapon is ugly child of a Thompson and a PPSch-41.
After the first trial he "redesigned" and "copy" the reciver and the savty mechanism from Browning and others. So his weapons is a mix or the "best of" of all weapons but ...sure nothing from the germans....
because of ? what ?
He must be stupid to didnt look at a captured stg 44 and it makes no sense that he doesnt test it. Even he is at an testing ground to "learn" from others.
And too Gruner and the stamping part.
They have stamping problems with weapons and "oh" the germans who argubly have the most knowledge of their time about stamping are not allowed to help them ... because of what ? ?? they went back to germany and build weapons.
Hey "but there is a document" wich.... sure and why would they lie about the most famous thing out of russia besides vodka
I dont want to pop ur little blubble but maybe the "biggist russian weapon Nerd/Fanboy in history" is not an impartial source.
#Prokhorovka
And the whole Tiger is the answer to t34 BS.... pls dont get even start with that.
pls dont reply to someone who plays the game... 
maybe u just play axis if u want heavy tanks(wich get countered even before theyre hit the field). . i cant do anything about the US Tank doctine in ww2... wich is basicly "zergrush" with Tanks to fight inf and TD to fight Tanks. 
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
