Profile of ddd

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 528 | Subs: 1

General Information
Website: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198058464077
Steam: 76561198058464077


Thread: Poll for hotly debated units in new commanders.27 Mar 2019, 13:38 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2019, 09:39 AMVipper Ok you simply want to continue to argue semantics, I will have no part in it. PzIV frontal armor advantage is inferior to extra HP Easy8 and Easy8 has superior rear armor (okw PzIV has even less than Ostheer PzIV). Point goes to Easy8. Once more you data is simply false about mobility: PzIV Speed: 6/Accel: 2/Rotate: 30 Easy8 Speed: 6.1/Accel: 2.1/Rotate: 32 Easy8 is simply more mobile. Point goes to Easy8. PzIV has a better AI but Easy8 has enough AI and it supported by deadlier infatry. Point goes to PzIV. In addition Easy8 get better moving accuracy, smoke and a crew. It is simply not inferior. Pls move on. You simply misunderstood what i tried to say but i belive you got it now. P4 armor adventage is superior to easy8 measly 80hp because it lets you avoid potentialy many more shots instead of one guaranteed snare for easy8. Especialy when you take into account disparity between zook/m1 57 and pshreck/raketen penetration. Point for p4. P4 has combat blitz ability which not only makes it faster but also for some reason improves its accuracy. Point for p4. P4 has better anti infantry performance. Point for p4. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poll for hotly debated units in new commanders.27 Mar 2019, 09:03 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2019, 07:56 AMVipper PLS make up your mind: Now in your opinion the Easy8 is mediocre unit with same power level of OKW PzIV, while the PzIV with same cost is the most cost efficient medium tank. You are simply contradicting yourself. You have tried to present the Easy8 as inferior to other premium mediums when clearly it is not, now pls lets move on. "Power level" is not equal to performance. Just as pershing and tiger are at similar power level, both costing the same and having the same role (heavy tank), yet tiger outperforms pershing because it has better stats for its intended role. Same with easy8 and oke p4, easy8 has some adventages but p4 is better where it counts for medium tank: anti infantry capabilities, armor, mobility. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: is the king tiger the best single tank in the game?27 Mar 2019, 00:46 AM Adolf Hitler tank commander authorized to call down V1 rockets and suicide stuka planes assisted by panther battlegruppe with autorepairs and periodic flares launched off in front of assault. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW AA HQ26 Mar 2019, 22:08 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2019, 21:56 PMborobadger This thread is about the Schwer base, at least try and keep it on topic. I've always thought it was super OP, honestly don't know why it's in the game. Why do OKW need free cut off protection compared to any other faction? Its in the game because originaly okw had reduced fuel income and they had to setup trucks on the front to get normal fuel income. Thats why shwerer HQ can defend itself. Why wasnt it changed when they got rid of reduced fuel income? Probably because it was too much work to come up with something else. Is it op? On some 1v1 maps i think yes (i play only 1v1). For example if you put it correctly on kholodny ferma you have fuel and cutoff protection for the rest of the game while shwerer HQ is difficult to destroy here. You can then harass enemy fuel with rest of your army. On crossing in the woods puting shwerer HQ in the front is too risky and it usualy stays on cutoff only where its not that much of an issue. It works very good on maps that were not designed with this mechanic in mind but at this point they wont remove it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Poll for hotly debated units in new commanders.26 Mar 2019, 21:23 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2019, 21:06 PMVipper Wrong.Pls check your stats both Easy8 and OKW PzIV cost 380/140 the T-34/85 cost 380/130. I said easy8 is more/as expensive. You show me example that easy8 is indeed as expensive or more expensive than one of these tanks (okw p4, t34/85) and than you say im wrong. I dont understand... Since Easy8 comes with a 0.75 accuracy on the move, smoke and crew I would say that is more cost efficient than both the other 2. I was saying nothing about cost efficiency, for me okw p4 is most cost efficient medium tank simply because its ideal versus allied tools, mainly its armor vs bazookas/ptrs/usf at gun and blitz that lets it engage/disengage with ease. It is my opinion that commanders should not give superior units in different areas like indirect fire (calliope) and armor (Easy8). Especially since Ostheer will probably have to relay on paks/ shrecks to counter Easy8s and those can be countered by caliope. Its your oppinion, my opinion is that usf tier 3 is weak when it comes to unit variety, much like soviet one. Soviets get many doctrines with multiple armor units to compensate, usf doctrines have usualy only 1 armor unit (exception: armor doctrine). Also you worded it like usf will get calliope and easy8 for free. Easy8 is not call in vehicle, you will have to tech up which is a ton of fuel to get them both, and ostheer player will have enough time to build counters (nondoctrinal counters, like panther for example). Or just pick new ostheer commander and call in tiger without teching cost, thats the meta right now. In addition in order for more commanders to viable the power level of commander should be about equal and commander with both calliope and Easy8 would make both Tactical support and Rifle companies obsolete. Im afraid you are living in the past, both rifle and tactical support commanders are dead for years now. No matter how bad you will make new usf commander, these 2 wont get picked anyway. You will just add another unused commander to the list. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ambulance QoL Change26 Mar 2019, 21:07 PM Please give usf healing mechanic that is not countered by puma. Make it immobile and keep fuel cost but much more durable. Either defensive setup for ambulance that can be only used in base sector and takes long time to estabilish, medic crates for rear echelons or upgrade in HQ, something that lets you play the game without worrying about light vehicle in your base hunting for ambulance. No forward retreat bullshit. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poll for hotly debated units in new commanders.26 Mar 2019, 20:26 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2019, 14:18 PMLago I don't think it'd be overpowered, but it'd probably kill poor Tactical Support stone dead. Sorry to say it dude, but tactical support is dead for a few years now. There is nothing to kill here. Which probably shows us how bad calliope is since this doctrine has some good abilities: lmg for rifles, recon overflight which is always good and m5 hf, best anti aircraft vehicle in game. If these abilities are not enough to make this doctrine useful it means calliope is really terrible. And i really dont think new usf commander (or any commander to be honest) should be adjusted with unused for years, nerfed to the groud commanders from the past in mind. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poll for hotly debated units in new commanders.26 Mar 2019, 20:19 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2019, 15:23 PMVipper Dear katitof PLS stop your silly campaign of trying to prove me wrong. Filling the forum with pointless, failed attempts to prove me wrong is completely non constructive and its guess it becoming increasingly tiring to everyone reading these post. Even you compare the Easy8 to the T-34/85 it as at least as durable. It can take the same number of shots and has more armor. It has 720hp which is lower than 800hp of t34/85, also its 215 armor is lower than the 234 armor of okw p4 (and ost vet 2 p4 too). Ofcourse easy8 has something better than them, its more/as expensive, right? My original point was that easy8 is at the same power level as t34/85 and okw p4, just because it has better gun in exchange for durability, mobility and reload doesnt make it "premium" tank over these two. It also has worse anti infantry performance than t34/85 and okw p4 so there is a lot of things its worse at than these two. And now we come back to original point, how would easy8 be broken in combination with calliope? I just dont see that when every other faction can have far more powerful combination. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW AA HQ26 Mar 2019, 20:07 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2019, 19:50 PMdistrofio Rly? How infortunate can be the other player to EXPOSE its HQ buildings? Imagine playing USF with an ambulance in the frontlines. Same deal. When did they add flak to usf ambulance? I missed that change. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Poll for hotly debated units in new commanders.26 Mar 2019, 13:40 PM You know people didnt use easy8 in months when they say it would be too strong with calliope (LOL). If okw p4 with stuka and t34/85 with katyusha are ok then how can easy8, tank with less hp than t34 and less armor than p4, be too strong with anything? Tiger with pwerfer, comet with mattress, is2 with katyusha, kingtiger with stuka are all ok but a fricking EASY8 IS TOO STRONG? Please at least play ONE game with this tank before speaking out. In: COH2 Gameplay