Profile of SuperHansFan

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 833

General Information


Thread: USF on life support29 Jun 2020, 11:15 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2020, 11:07 AMT.R. Stormjäger So when's the hotfix to mega buff USF dropping? After their embarrassing showing in the MLNZ finals it is obvious even to the lowest skill player that the faction is in need of supermassive buffs to every single unit to even compete with the god faction known as Ostheer. I propose: Riflemen start with double BARs when built REs start with M1919s Jackson 300 armour Scott 70 range CalliOP stock and double barrage lethality Pack Howie 100mp cost You get 2 LTs and 2 Cpts for teching .50cal gets 0.1sec set up and tear down time M1 AT gun doubled penetration These buffs are a good start, maybe then the wheelchair faction will finally be able to somewhat compete with the superhuman 5man Grenadiers. There buffs are way too big, USFs major issue is mostly in team games which could and should be fixed with a few buffs and adjustments to m20, Scott, Pershing etc. Rifleman performance is mostly fine but gren power creep with fiveman needs looking at, maybe remove their faust so we see some LMG grens mixed in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: "Close the pocket" OP? 29 Jun 2020, 08:35 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2020, 23:52 PMPanzerGeneralForever The entire commander is based around closing the pocket and is a terrible commander without it. I don't see how 4 players can let the enemy destroy both your cutoff caches, decap the points, and keep them cutoff for even a few moments. When you pull it off its you deserve the reward for your risk, when it's pulled off against you, it's time for bed cause you ain't paying attention. You either remove it from the game or leave it as it is. There are so many ways to prevent this from happening in a game and shutdown the entire commander it's not even funny The doctrine could quite easily be changed to one with a theme of cutting off supply lines with stormtroopers buffed for this purpose. (Increased damage vs cache and decap). This would make it viable in competitive play and remove unfun cheese from average/noob level play that frustrates many players. With specialist stormtroopers and rest of doctrine buffed you could remove close the pocket and replace it with an arty call in. Basically it would be the ostheer version of Partisan tactics. I can see why people like stomping noobs with a cheese ability players don't understand how to counter though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grens changes29 Jun 2020, 08:32 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2020, 08:01 AMKatitof What do you expect? Wehr has CHEAPEST mainline inf, even cons require much greater investment for their full basic utility. And wehr has best and earliest support weapons and units. If you want to play with mainline inf spam, don't play wehr or use this exact doctrine. Actually you're wrong You need to build T1 so this is factored into squad core cost, soviets can build cons without a tech structure so they are the cheapest In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the ISU-15229 Jun 2020, 08:28 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2020, 21:30 PMKoRneY you've demonstrated your vast knowledge of axis once again At least I can admit when I'm wrong, but it doesn't help Cohstats has outdated values. What I will demonstrate is the lack of replays proving ISU one shots in the thread. But obviously I'm number one on the personal attacks. So leave it to PM if you have a problem with me PLS In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the ISU-15229 Jun 2020, 08:26 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2020, 21:24 PMSander93 T-34/76 has a 100% chance to pen the Elefant or Jagdtiger rear armor from close range. The P4s have an 81% chance to pen the ISU-152's rear armor from close range. Then a reduction of Ele/KT/JT armor is not needed But personally I've had bounces on rear armor so maybe there are some missing values here In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The problem with raketen29 Jun 2020, 04:17 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2020, 04:39 AMdistrofio I'm fully aware that raketen is both, a must have for okw early game but also a risky move, because once revealed, the allied player can simply choose not to cheese with early lv bullying and pick another infantry squad for an almost 2 squad advantage, depending on the allied faction. Okw have the spio squad to mitigate the missing raketen but it's pretty lackluster in AT performance. I'd say that a raketen nerf will force a sturmpio buff. Also I would say that raketen towards late game are less potent, specially when compared to allied ATG. Why would you build a Rak early with no LV on the field? Small arms can hold off until you can just build one reactively. If you're really paranoid you could just go pfuss, but it's not like volk Faust timing is that late. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript change.29 Jun 2020, 02:50 AM Got any replays to back that up? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the ISU-15228 Jun 2020, 16:53 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2020, 16:45 PMKronosaur0s Yes I also agree that small arms fire should damage a Jagdtiger rear armor, 110 too high yet. Weren't you just in the old Jackson thread complaining Jackson armor at 120 was too high and p4/puma should never bounce it? Why shouldn't your logic apply to T34 behind ele, KT or JT? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: "Close the pocket" OP? 28 Jun 2020, 16:03 PM Anyone that says the ability is fine obviously has never played 4vs4 redball before And just because top players can counter cheese (sim city) that doesn't mean it doesn't ruin plenty of average level games. Same logic applies here, you can have a 30min even and fun game just ruined in the space of a few seconds because of the delete enemy armies button. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the ISU-15228 Jun 2020, 15:58 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2020, 14:36 PMButcher https://youtu.be/zobVgWdbyqw?t=2447 I linked you the time. Shows everything that is wrong with the ISU. A Cromwell would have made mincemeat of an Elefant/ Jagdtiger in the same situation. Meanwhile the Panzer IV bounces most shots on the ISU (even on the rear). T-34/76 actually has less chance to pen a JT than a P4 can a ISU. So if the chance of RNG bounces is the issue then JT/KT/Ele should get rear armor reductions too. Cromwell is an outlier because it has an extra 10pen over the Sherman in close range. I think it should be 10f higher now the MGs were buffed. In: COH2 Balance