Profile of Kirrik

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 573

General Information


Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch14 Sep 2018, 18:29 PM KV-2 can shoot through "terrain" not shot blockers, it's siege cannon is like leig, meaning it cant really shoot through buildings, it will hit building itself if target near it This is different from Pak or JT, and thats the point - you can easily wreck KV-2 with JT, contrary to what certain people imply in this thread In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch14 Sep 2018, 18:14 PM Your point: KV-2 is OP because it received same type of buff ISU/Brummbar did, except you can put it behind shot blocks and because of that you cant counter it the same way you counter ISU Reality: Single OST Panther can destroy KV-2 even in tank mode and JT can shoot through shot blockers KV-2 is hiding behind, making your entire point moot. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch14 Sep 2018, 18:04 PM You realize KV-2 AoE profile buff was exactly the same thing that happened to ISU and Brummbar? Wider aoe radius but less damage in center of AoE itself, it never meant to turn it into a wipe machine (and it didnt) Also I'm pretty sure you dont need Elefant/JT to counter KV-2, it literally loses 1v1 against single Panther even after buff it's received, at JT you mentioned before can shoot through shot blockers. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch14 Sep 2018, 17:49 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Sep 2018, 17:46 PMStark Becouse in sage mode it has: 1. range of a elefant 2. can fire behind houses and any other blockers don't you see any problem here at all? First of all, its 70 range, its same as ISU and below normal mortar range Second: siege mode was not buffed in any way aside of AoE profile buff, KV-2 in siege mode behaves exactly as it did before buff, its normal tank mode that recieved buff in commander patch Third: ISU does it better than KV-2 by virtue of not having to bother with stationary mode at all and by having ballistic speed HE rounds, while KV-2 fires slow projectives which are inaccurate as hell, especially at long range even against static targets Oh and static shot blockers also affect KV-2 accuracy, its not firing mortar rounds you know? Parking your infantry behind building will cause KV-2 to hit said building. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch14 Sep 2018, 17:36 PM Also regarding "insanly good KV (too good but that;s for another topic)" Is this some kind of new meme? Look at KV-2 stats post buff, its still inferior to IS-2 in every single way aside of AI performance which is merely equals ISU but ISU has 30 longer range and can fire those shells without ever needing to use stationary siege mode, which makes it far more responsive to enemy pushes. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch14 Sep 2018, 17:01 PM Are you saying building two OST bunkers and MG + mortar does not have exactly same effect on Allies? If FHQ ever loses aura and gets CP requirement then it must also lose fuel cost along with it, otherwise its inferior copy of Ost bunkers and Brit assembly In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch14 Sep 2018, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Sep 2018, 16:38 PMStark Made some tests to Urban Defensive doctrine. Guys, you represent a balance team so can you explain me and others why is that Forward HQ is so dirty cheap from what it does? Why doesn't it has CP requirement? Can you imagine how deadly it can be in teamgames especially in certain maps. It costs only 200 mp 25 fuel (buildable version) or 250mp 40 fuel to transform a house. It buffs near infantry, heal squads, you can reinforce (EVEN when terrytory is decapped). There is no other forward HQ that is so cheap and gives so much in exchange. Any other faction has to upgrade healing, doesn't get any buffs to nearby units. No other faction can implemented such a strat so early on the battlefield where there isn't serious counter yet. Someone may say "but becouse it comes so early you lack of infantry present on the field". Yes but to kill it i have to get not 1 but at least 2 mortars or isg's to destroy it which also put a player behind in infantry present. All above brings cancerous gameplay in teamgames which shouldn't be implemented. This commander wasn't used becouse other abilities were really weak. But now with better AT gun, insanly good KV (too good but that;s for another topic). PLZ take it serious and consider giving it at least 2CP when match will be at stage where axis can pull counters to that stratigic build. Also at least test an upgrade for healing and bonuses to nearby units. Locking it behind 2 CP and changing FHQ cost to 250 MP/100 Munitions and (basically 80% of the cost of Ost command and medic bunkers) is reasonable. Aura could also become activated ability that costs munitions too. Urban commander does not have much munition sinks after incendiary arty got removed In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch13 Sep 2018, 18:27 PM Has balance team considered just merging E8 and 76mm Sherman? These two units despite being basically a same thing (sherman with 76mm cannon) behave VERY differently, on low vets E8 is kinda better since it can surive one more shot from AT, but at high vet or Combined Arms buff 76mm becomes monster, perhaps you should just give 76mm sherman 80 more HP then reduce its reload speed and merge both units into one In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch13 Sep 2018, 07:58 AM Speaking of Sturmtiger I dont understand it's nerfs, its already way worse than AVRE to due to how clunky and slow it is, nerfing its AoE and adding supression wont really help it, people build AVRE and ST to counter blobs or walls of AT guns/MGs, nerfing AoE damage pretty much makes Sturmtiger even more useless than it already is In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch12 Sep 2018, 22:42 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2018, 22:24 PMMrBananaGrabber. Someone mentioned in a stream that it would be great if the recon support paras got the same AT sticky bomb that the Cavalry Riflemen have, as part of their zook upgrade. Which sounds like a really great idea to me, but I asusme that couldn't be added as that's beyond the remit of the patch. It was me, and Recon paras are stuck in same limbo as Assault Guards from Lend Lease. There are changes that were relevant to both squads in this rework/update but they are out of scope In: Lobby