Profile of Kirrik

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 573

General Information


Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch19 Sep 2018, 22:22 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 22:07 PMShadowLinkX37 People complaining about concrete bunkers doctrine overshadowing other doctrines, when the exact same person told me except this time its on the axis side..... huh weird...... Way to miss my point completely, Osttruppen wasnt nerfed instead Defensive was simply made into better Osttruppen. Also KV-2 changes went under the radar for pretty much everyone, it's fire rate in siege mode went from to 6 to 9, thats a huge nerf. Nerfing its pen in tank mode you risk making it potentially even worse than prior to rework, considering people would not risk that tank in direct combat with such low pen, meaning it will be stuck in siege mode with firing 50% slower than before. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch19 Sep 2018, 18:47 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 18:46 PMLemonJuice ???? So if an underwhelming doctrine is better than a more underwhelming doctrine it’s strong??? Who said Osttruppen is underwhelming? Did you even watch GCS? In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch19 Sep 2018, 18:43 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 18:41 PMLemonJuice Yeah it really isn’t. Sector arty is a really shit ability that’s completely dependent on your enemy not noticing a giant highlighted sector on the map, pak43 is good but with the proper loading screen preparation is really easy to deal with, and ostruppen have a pretty hard time dealing with elite Infantry, and if u go ostruppen you’ll probably skip t1, which is pretty risky. It's still above everything Osttrupen doctrine offers, making your point about this commander being underwhelming pretty obviously dishonest. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch19 Sep 2018, 18:35 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 18:33 PMLemonJuice I feel like I’m ok with concrete bunkers tbh, the doctrine as a whole doesn’t really have much going for it. It’s not like it has an elefant at the end of the tree or any game winning abilities. If concrete bunkers are the best thing it has then it’s whatever. So Osttruppen/Pak43/Stug E/Sector arty is not much? That combination alone makes it better Osttrupen doctrine, thats without bunkers. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch19 Sep 2018, 18:01 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2018, 18:00 PMTiger Baron Curb your passive aggressiveness, stats can be and probably will be adjusted, plus nothing here is set in stone, they could as easily just make it an upgrade for the regular bunker depending on it's performance. Upgrade for a bunker that cost 25mp more than actual repair stations and has 640hp? Nice one In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch19 Sep 2018, 17:57 PM Okay, who thought of giving Ostheer 960 HP 35 armor repair staion for 250 MP and X munitions? These things would be undestructible by howitzers and rocket artillery. There would be zero counterplay to this and more importantly - bunkers are already purest of form of cancer in teamgames, they cost zero popcap unlike Brit emplacements and could be easily spammed in lategame What did you even think when coming up with that idea? Did you even bother check stats on Soviet repair station? Like check it's hp/armor and cost compared to these bunkers? In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch17 Sep 2018, 18:11 PM Thats not for urban maps, but maps with either no buildings or wooden houses, where you cant really make FHQ because it will get burned down very fast In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch16 Sep 2018, 09:34 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2018, 09:29 AMSneakEye Maybe using the ZIS-truck would solve the confusion and gives it a nice Soviet touch at the same time. Are vehicle models even replaceable within these kind of structures? Or you're suggesting Zis truck as a field base of sorts? I dont think truck is durable enough compared to Brit forward assembly, it would be too easy to destroy with indirect fire In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch16 Sep 2018, 09:21 AM And why exactly it has no place in Urban doctrine? It make sense thematically and armor callins are basically must-have for a viable soviet commander pick, soviet late game tanks are a joke in comparison to Axis. Your advices are basically boil down to how make even more unviable commanders which noone would pick In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch16 Sep 2018, 08:02 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Sep 2018, 07:59 AMVipper This is not the place to debate what point I am missing or not, this is thread about providing feedback. I have provided mine. If you want to debate revamp from design point of view pls start a new thread or even use the one I have created: https://www.coh2.org/topic/81270/commander-rework-approach Are you openly trolling in this thread or what? You're the one who is going offtopic here by bringing up meta commanders outside of the scope. You're the one who is also debating the point of revamp, not me. You're not providing feedback on current revamped commanders you're discussing stuff clearly outside of the scope In: Lobby