Profile of mr.matrix300

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 518

General Information
Register Time: 15 Feb 2018, 21:30 PM
Last Visit Time: 18 Jul 2022, 16:23 PM

Signature

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

Playing with randoms

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:11 AMCODGUY

I don't play this version of EZ mode very often because it's so boringly simple. But it is funny to see the Axis circle jerk with people complaining that the one faction with every crutch in the book is some how underpowered lol.

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

29 Jun 2020, 19:21 PMIncendiaryRounds

u deserve to lose if u don't have an Ele when there's an ISU.
Just stay out of topics u have no knowledge of, Latch.

12 Aug 2020, 10:02 AMProtos Angelus

Ranked, I only play USF. Wouldn't be caught dead playing Nazis with some sort of record being taken

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you, and wouldn't be surprised to be hit again, but I'm fed up with this bullshit and honestly, the sole fact that I'm not permad is what keeps me here having discussions about the game I like and yes, I do question myself why I still go back here to this free range insane asylum so often.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades15 Aug 2018, 15:51 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2018, 07:16 AMKatitof Suuure they do, especially if you have all that time to stop, aim, fire/wait for lobbed projectile to land. You really think that is on pair with instant ninja smoke bomb? Aren't Sherman and Valentine ones fireable on the move? (and Cromwells ones too?) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades15 Aug 2018, 02:10 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2018, 00:43 AMLoopDloop Ironic that you say that because only 2 units in all 3 allied factions have a panzer tactician type smoke (AEC and sort of the normal churchill). The Smokerounds of the Sherman, Cromwell, Comet , Valentine also work fine as an escape assistant In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades14 Aug 2018, 15:45 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Aug 2018, 12:15 PMKharn Fausts are easily the best tank snare in the game, they'll be useful 99% of the time as allied tanks other than the AEC don't have an instant ninja smoke bomb. Sherman, Cromwell, Valentine, Comet. Also: It is not only about Smoke. Russian AT nades can also be used even if the squad itself has no LoS, Panzerfaust and Rifle snare can't In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades12 Aug 2018, 17:13 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2018, 16:44 PMLago The USF BAR, OST G43 and OKW STG are the only weapon upgrades I can think of which are absolute improvements: the other weapon upgrades make the squad worse in some respect. LMG upgrades make squads trash close up and don't fire on the move, SMG upgrades make squads trash at range. With "Lmgs" I also meant the BARs (always forget that they more act like Stg 44s and thus aren't "real" Lmgs in this game).And is it really that hard when Cons long range DPS gets decreased? I mean they already aren't that great on long range so you basically always have to get close to the enemy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades12 Aug 2018, 15:45 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2018, 01:07 AMthedarkarmadillo @matrix300 Ppshs increase close dps but reduce far dps creating a role change. Conscripts aren't meant to fight long range battles so it isn't a role change Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2018, 01:07 AMthedarkarmadillo there is not ever a single reason in the entire game under no scenario that upgrading to STGs is a bad move at all ever. Doesn't the same apply to US LMGs and PPsh 41 too? Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2018, 01:07 AMthedarkarmadillo Building a lot of cons without the ppsh ability is a losing strat because while you are spamming rifle infantry the enemy is matching you AND has an upgrade that increases their DPS Those upgrades cost ammo which you can spend on other stuff. Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2018, 01:07 AMthedarkarmadillo You can't just build cons like you can volks and transition into the late game. You will NEED guards or penal to stand half a chance. Only building Volks will get you also into trouble since they aren't that great when unupgraded and even with Upgrade they are not some kinda of "Ultra-Terminator" squad. And using Cons in late game acutally works. They are a decent infantry unit for their price. Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2018, 01:07 AMthedarkarmadillo Ptac is already a 1 click wonder, if the enemy has snare infantry in range YOU failed to provide proper support and yes you desire to get snared. The pfaust on anything but volks should also apply to that. So if Russians snare thought buildings and smoke it is ok and deserved but not so if the same happens with Volks ? Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2018, 01:07 AMthedarkarmadillo Also-fausts can be used against buildings and shit, so maybe THAT'S the "counter weight" if others do it should all of then Oh yea ... slightly damaging buildings is a really good counterewight to beeing able to throw AT nades even throught you have no LoS. If only Russians had this ability too ... something which could get used as AT nade and Building destroyer ... something like satchel. Jump back to quoted post12 Aug 2018, 10:10 AMLago So I did some testing myself and it turns out this issue is a symptom of something different. The Panzerfaust and USF AT Rifle Grenade require the squad itself to have line-of-sight and the other snares don't. USF AT Rifle Grenades and OST/OKW Panzerfausts require the squad itself to have line of sight to the target vehicle for the firing animation to start. If the squad itself doesn't have line of sight when the animation starts the ability will cancel. Once the animation starts you're safe: if you lose LoS during the Panzerfaust animation the ability will still fire. Other AT grenades do not require the squad itself to have LoS: provided the player can see the vehicle the squad will throw the snare. This doesn't just apply to smoke. They'll throw their snares through hedges and buildings too if they can get the target in range. Thanks for the testings. In my opinion this makes the whole situation even more broke. Just imagine getting snared out of nowhere. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades11 Aug 2018, 23:30 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 21:19 PMShadowLinkX37 Is there any proof of that? Like if the smoke takes effect, you can’t see that vehicle anyways and can’t target it with anything. Prior to the smoke taking effect I think everything works like the smoke isn’t even there. Basically: video please https://www.coh2.org/replay/81742/smoke-vs-snare/page/1#post_id694115 Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 22:30 PMSkysTheLimit Play more USF in actual games and you'll notice it cancel out sometimes if the vehicle moves in and out of the minimum range. You can clearly see the min range UI when you click the ability. Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 22:30 PMSkysTheLimit "Your"? Where's the entire problem you're talking about? If the vehicles obscured by smoke, nothing can target it. Except Russian AT nades. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Smoke vs Snare 11 Aug 2018, 23:27 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 23:25 PMmr.matrix300 Just upload this because of an Balance thread Um ... ok ... not sure what I messed up. Can some moderator please delete the 2 other Replays(accidentally posted this 3 times in a row)? Thanks in ahead In: Replays
Thread: Smoke vs Snare 11 Aug 2018, 23:25 PM Just upload this because of an Balance thread In: Replays
Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades11 Aug 2018, 21:06 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 21:02 PMShadowLinkX37 Don’t all snares still fire through smoke once the animation starts? Yes you can’t shoot the snare if you can’t target the vehicle. What is the problem here? The problem is that Satchel and RPG 40/43 can be used on vehicles which are already covered in smoke. While the Panzerfaust can't (you can aim at the vehicle but the animation won't start) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades11 Aug 2018, 20:58 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 16:56 PMSkysTheLimit The allied faction with the cheapest teching doesn't even have snares. Brits having no AT snare for their regular infantry without doctrine is a problem. So is Satchels and RPG 43/40s getting thrown through the smoke Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 16:56 PMSkysTheLimit If I need snares to counter light vehicle play as soviets, I gotta spend 25 fuel just for that. And if you don't need it then you will be ahead when it comes to teching up Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 16:56 PMSkysTheLimit I mean the minimum range on USF snare is a pretty obvious drawback. How the hell does smoke difficulty(even though tank smoke is vastly more common on axis tanks) compare to not even being able to use the snare because you're too close to the tank? So I just did some tests and I could stand my Rifles on a distance where their faces were touching steel. And? The rifle snare was still useable. Where was your minimum range? Jump back to quoted post11 Aug 2018, 16:56 PMSkysTheLimit And like Vipper said, there's also some snares that cancel if you leave the range before they are thrown. As far as I understood Panzerfaust also falls under this category In: COH2 Balance