Profile of mr.matrix300

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 518

General Information
Register Time: 15 Feb 2018, 21:30 PM
Last Visit Time: 18 Jul 2022, 16:23 PM

Signature

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

Playing with randoms

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:11 AMCODGUY

I don't play this version of EZ mode very often because it's so boringly simple. But it is funny to see the Axis circle jerk with people complaining that the one faction with every crutch in the book is some how underpowered lol.

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

29 Jun 2020, 19:21 PMIncendiaryRounds

u deserve to lose if u don't have an Ele when there's an ISU.
Just stay out of topics u have no knowledge of, Latch.

12 Aug 2020, 10:02 AMProtos Angelus

Ranked, I only play USF. Wouldn't be caught dead playing Nazis with some sort of record being taken

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you, and wouldn't be surprised to be hit again, but I'm fed up with this bullshit and honestly, the sole fact that I'm not permad is what keeps me here having discussions about the game I like and yes, I do question myself why I still go back here to this free range insane asylum so often.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Are UKF dead in 1v1?5 Sep 2018, 17:07 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 19:19 PMTheGentlemenTroll Puma has always been the premium counter to LV gameplay since forever. Its longer range allows it to win 90% of engagements against other LVs as long as you micro it properly. Since Puma costs more than most other LVs, comes later than them and has no real AI damaged I see no problem here. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 19:19 PMTheGentlemenTroll An AEC loses to a Puma almost always considering it should get first shot off with its longer range. If you run right into the Puma then yes. But if you flank him then you got a good chance of winning In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are UKF dead in 1v1?4 Sep 2018, 17:24 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 02:23 AMLoopDloop The aec’s smoke seems to be very “thin” in that any lateral movement reveals it as a target again. At least it protects against Snares, unlike Puma smoke which doesn't protect against satchels and some other AT nades (this is because of other reasons not because of the smoke itself but it still is an advantage) Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 02:23 AMLoopDloop No one really buys more than one aec though so the teching cost is really in practice just part of the unit cost. No. Just because you don't buy more than one it doesn't mean other players do so too. And since you do not have to pay the 15 fuel and 100 MP for every AEC again it is not part of the unit cost. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 02:23 AMLoopDloop I already said in the post you quoted that he puma with overall costs does still end up being more expensive. Then what is your point? AEC as a single unit is cheaper than Puma and even its Overall cost are still less than for Puma. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 08:37 AMSuperHansFan I never claimed Luch or Puma was OP compared to AEC... And I never said that you claimed this. I just asked where your AEC is when your enemy has Luchs + Puma and advised you trying to build bofors if your enemy goes for T2 (and you haven't AEC yet) since OKWs T2 can barly do anything against them. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 08:37 AMSuperHansFan The issue is in a light vehicle meta OKW have 4-5 squads running around with snare While OKW has 3-4 (4-5 Volks is something I barely see / do) squads with snares you have 4 or more units which can be upgraded with AT weapons Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 08:37 AMSuperHansFan and brits have nothing. AEC, Sniper, Mines and PIAT. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 08:37 AMSuperHansFan pushing up an aggressive AEC is suicide with volks hiding behind every flank or corner. Keep distance and do not rush into the enemy. And if they flank you then use smoke in order to make the snares useless Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2018, 08:37 AMSuperHansFan Meanwhile the Axis player can light vehicle harass the brits all day Have you tried using PIATS, AT guns, Mines or Bofors? And at least OKWs light vehicles (which actually are able to fight against enemy troops) come out after T0 and cost some fuel In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are UKF dead in 1v1?4 Sep 2018, 00:53 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 20:01 PMLoopDloop The puma's smoke also actually works properly and it can engine damage the AEC at vet1. What is the problem with AEC smoke? And what about the Immobilization rounds of the AEC (btw. did they got changed? Instead of the ability description I now get "key not found 14233353" when moving with the mouse over it) Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 20:01 PMLoopDloop Also technically the AEC is more expensive because of the sidetech (so 280 60 goes to 380 75) but that's offset by the fact that brit tier 1 is a cheaper than okw tier 2. Since you don't have to pay the 100 MP/ 15 fuel upgrade every time you buy an AEC it isn't part of the units cost (and when looking at the overall costs (unit cost + teching costs)then the Puma is still more exspensive) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are UKF dead in 1v1?3 Sep 2018, 19:40 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 18:12 PMKatitof Doesn't work that way bud, AEC doesn't have any more RoF, can't bounce and have lower range while having same damage and health. I did some tests with Puma vs AEC on close range and it most times was a close match (sometimes with the Puma as winner sometimes with AEC). The point is that if you flank the Puma you have a good chance of winning against him even tho he is more expensive. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 18:12 PMKatitof AEC also is used to harass infantry, while Puma not really, so puma will always be reactive use, allowing for first shot So you are complaining about the AEC being used to harass infantry ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are UKF dead in 1v1?3 Sep 2018, 17:40 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 17:27 PMKatitof Probably died to superior range puma. Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 15:39 PMKatitof Purely dependent on circumstances, if you have place to kite, puma will win, if you don't, t34 will. Now apply this to Puma and AEC (and who gets Puma before Luchs anyway, except if your enemy already has a tank out?) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are UKF dead in 1v1?3 Sep 2018, 17:18 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 00:17 AMSuperHansFan DBP and the spring patch removed any crutches they had like cover bonus, UC, bren, AEC aim shot or centaur cheese. Most of this does still exist Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 00:17 AMSuperHansFan Early game UKF get bullied flame nades What is your problem with flame nades? All you have to do is moving out of its area. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 00:17 AMSuperHansFan and luch+puma, If your enemy has Luchs + Puma,then where is your AEC? And if your enemy went for T2 then just build Bofors (if you don't have AEC yet). As OKW its hard to counter them when you go T2. Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2018, 01:24 AMTheGentlemenTroll He meant to say UKF sucks vs OKW but sucks even more against OST No. I meant exactly what I wrote. If you are playing as OKW vs Brits then you will have a hard time. UC is pushing you around till you have T1 (or T2 which takes even longer), if you go for T1 you won't have a decent AI nor AT weapon till T3 (since Flak-HT turned into garbage) and if you go for T2 then either your luchs will come out around the same time as AEC or you will face Bofors while having no real tool to counter them ... except backteching to T1 (meanwhile your enemy will get his first real tank) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are UKF dead in 1v1?2 Sep 2018, 21:49 PM Against OST they are a bit underpowered but when facing them as OKW they can be a pain in the knee to play against In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mechanized Assault broken ? 18 Aug 2018, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2018, 19:03 PMVonIvan What faction were you playing? When using the commander obviously OST and while facing this commander SU. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mechanized Assault broken ? 18 Aug 2018, 18:35 PM So I started playing 1 vs 1 recently again and faced an OST player who did the following : Assggrens(around 4-5 squads) into Sdkfz 250 with Pzgrens into Stug III E. supported with Pak 40 into Tiger I. I stood no chance, when he got the Tiger I I just got my first T 34/76 out. I was pretty much impressed by this and decided to dig the Mechanized Assault Doctrine out of the Trashbin (didn't like it that much before) and try my own version of this tactic(which doesn't need any upgrades except to T2 (to get access to nades) and maybe T1 for building one Gren sqaud to counter light vehicles). So far I only have lost one battle (out of 4 or 5?) with this tactic and to be honest It kinda feels broken. You start with Assgrens to counter Infantry then you go Pzgrens with Schrecks to counter light vehicles, then you go Stug III E. to counter infantry and finally the Tiger I. to finish your enemy. I mean ... sure once your Tiger I gets destroyed its most likly GG because you have no other real tanks on the field but it still is a bit broke in my opinion(even in 2 vs 2 where Assgrens can be combined with Osttruppen). In my opinion Assgrens should be moved to 1 CP in order to prevent an early spam of them. If someone thinks that this commander is fine then I would like to hear the reason why because after all 5(or 4) matches don't say that much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Impact of smoke on AT grenades16 Aug 2018, 16:19 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Aug 2018, 17:31 PMLoopDloop They have different uses and are not really comparable; it's like trying to compare the scott and stug E But just like the Stug E and Scott can both be used for indirect fire the smoke shells can also be used as an escape tool, while also beeing an effective counter to Snares(which has nothing to do with the smoke itself but with the LoS system as Lago exaplained). In: COH2 Balance