Profile of jagd wölfe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1660

General Information


Thread: Feedback for New Commander mod 4.0 - OST core changes15 Apr 2019, 20:43 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 20:21 PMmurky depths What? Does the shrek upgrade reduce the AI value of the 3 other models who don't get the shrek? Because 3 shrek upgraded squads is still 9 pfusiliers with k98s; putting aside the 6 shrek shots, are you telling me 5-riflemen or 6-conscripts can beat 9 pfusiliers? I will gladly put this to the test when I get home, but it sounds very PressXtoDoubt.jpg. Tell me the number that your think closer to the dps of 3 panzerfusiliers kar98k at vet 5 at mid range. I'll wait. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Falls should need munition to upgrade fg4215 Apr 2019, 20:38 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 20:30 PMCrecer13 FG-42 was extremely complex and extremely expensive to manufacture, which, along with the delay in its establishment, caused very little: 10-12 thousand were produced and it was used not only by Parachutists, it was used by all military branches: Luftwaffe, Wehrmacht, SS. And m3 grease gun were issued to vehicle crews. Going by equipment numbers, assault engineers would have at best m1 carbines. Not to speak that a lot were sent with lend lease. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Falls should need munition to upgrade fg4215 Apr 2019, 20:13 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 13:51 PMCrecer13 I don't revive the Falls to have 5 or 6 people, but then FG-42 should be reworked: it is long to become a BAR analog, 5-6 people with KAR98K and two FG-42, FG-42 was made in very small quantities and KAK98K It was still the main weapon of the German paratroopers, the FG-42 served mainly the same role as the BAR - a light support weapon. Production number is irrelevant in COH 2, US produced 650k m3 and m3a1 grease gun, 50k less than FG42, and still assault enfineers have up to 5 models with those weapons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for New Commander mod 4.0 - OST core changes15 Apr 2019, 20:00 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 19:55 PMpoop (kinda off-topic) DAE think that 34/85s should be non-doctrinal? Isn't really better than most mediums OOF In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Did you notice this skill only top players have?15 Apr 2019, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 19:43 PMLago It's a very intense game with a lot of highly frustrating mechanics. That's a recipe for eliciting strong negative emotional responses even before you throw the pressure of competitive stakes and a large audience on top of it. Can you honestly say you've never got angry with CoH 2? Sure, i don't blame him for anything, and this game can be intense, still, is very strange as reaction. Much more likely he had actually other matters and that contributed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Feedback for New Commander mod 4.0 - OST core changes15 Apr 2019, 19:33 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 18:42 PMRabidSchnauzer This again? KT isn't necessary, TA is fine where it is. OKW and OST have other issues to sharpen besides their heavy tank selection. And besides, it's NOT what was voted. You'd think the German players only care about their heavies judging by this routine. "OKW and OST have other issues to sharpen besides their heavy tank selection." And surely those aren't having new commanders, but still, here we are. Also, of all the arguments against it you use whataboutism.. really ? "And besides, it's NOT what was voted." Did we vote for what units should be put in ? Hmm, remember me when please "You'd think the German players only care about their heavies judging by this routine." Then you would think those people would have, like you said, "voted" for those changes, that according to you were "not voted". Contradicting statements one after the other...you don't even make sense... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketen Cloaking and its justification.15 Apr 2019, 19:08 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 18:45 PMKharn Maybe the easiest stop gap is to remove retreat but give it a 5 man crew. It will be wiped at every single push In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Raketen Cloaking and its justification.15 Apr 2019, 18:44 PM If OKW had reliable and decently efficient at stock Infantry like it was meant to rely on, but similar to Panzergrens 2 shreck, Raketen itself may even lose the ability to move when cloaked even without getting buffs, lose some mp cost and be the at stopgap support it was meant to be by design. But again, at this state, Cloaketen is staying this way. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Raketen Cloaking and its justification.15 Apr 2019, 18:36 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 18:30 PMLago I'm talking a wider firing arc and/or better accuracy here. Maybe something like the 6-pounder's accuracy bonus vs light vehicles, or a Vet 0 first strike bonus. Ok, but it will still hit the ground the moment there's cover or minimal elevation. Such thing can't be fixed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Raketen Cloaking and its justification.15 Apr 2019, 18:28 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2019, 18:22 PMLago If you make Raks need cover to stealth, they'll hit that cover whenever they fire scatter shots. That's why they cloak in the open in the first place. I'd happily ditch moving cloak in exchange for reliability buffs. There's a good unit in the Raketenwerfer somewhere, but at the moment it's frustrating for everyone. Nothing can be done, the profile of the unit will always cause reliability issues. In: COH2 Gameplay