Profile of jagd wölfe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1660

General Information


Thread: December Balance Preview13 Dec 2017, 22:48 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2017, 22:10 PMMr.Smith Soviet handbags had 240HP 10 armour OKW/USF sandbags had 110HP 35 armour OST/UKF sandbags had 300(?) HP 35 armour Handbag ? OPieOPie In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 20:04 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 19:57 PMferwiner Yes they would. Green and yellow cover doesn't apply under 10 range. Here is an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XID8YfsWfZo Mind that cons shoot only when stationary when ourah ability is used so they don't fire a single shot before entering 10 range, meaning that falls don't benefit from their cover at all. OFC. 1) they used no hourra 2) they have shot all the way to cover 3) you are trying to justify top level crap you apparently haven't seen at all. I did+.5 ask you to explain point blank mechanic, I asked you where's the difference if they haven't fired a single nade anyway. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 19:56 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 19:40 PMferwiner The outcome of that engagement was surely not ballanced but I think it's worth noting that in case of this engagement the green cover favours cons, not falls becouse it doesn't apply at such range either way and it doesn't allow falls to spread out. It also reduces damage of potential defending granade thrown on con squad path. .....what ? So the enagagement outcome would be different if they used no cover ? In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 19:33 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 17:45 PMMr.Smith The only engagement that was particularly troubling was the Falls vs PPSh cons one, and we know for granted that Falls +15% accuracy modifier at Vet5 is not applying properly at all. So you are implying that vet 3 ppsh cons should be able to rush no hourra to green covered vet 4 falls and kill them all ? In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 18:54 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 18:35 PMRussianHamster Other inf squads here. Problem are not in conscripts. Rifles looks especially funny. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/208969206 Vet 5 falls losing to ptrs penals, bar rifle and bren tommies, why are you surprised ? the game finally reached fully balanced form. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 17:35 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 17:32 PMStug life leaving asisde the luch issue ,mr smith can you please respond about the ppsh cons perfromance ? they seems a bit too strong even without hurra You mean the clip when they rush green covered fallschirmjager elite troops without hourra and win the engagement ? Working as intended. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 17:04 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 17:02 PMMr.Smith > Implying that Infantry Sections were OP outside cover in live version. No, they were in cover with vet 3 RA, they challenged pre nerf vet 4 obers in 1vs1 and parity of cover, this is why it ultimately got removed, but saying that IS are worse is simply not true, and facts are all against you, from kubel/flame nerf to IS dps buffs. I don't know if it is more funny that you are twisting once more words for your own purpose (kinda remembers me of changelog) or that you are claiming something factually (and easily provable) incorrect. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 15:44 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 15:35 PMMr.Smith [citation needed] "Moving accuracy modifier increased from 0.25 to 0.35 Vet 0 Received Accuracy reduced from 0.8 to 0.9 Scoped Enfields Vet 3 bonus removed (this causes Tommies to drop their Bren guns, even though enough models are alive) Bren gun reload time decreased from 8-9 secs to 6.5 secs Population cap reduced to 6 from 7 (Becomes 7 at 5-man) Increased cone of fire from 1 to 5 Tommies are receiving additional changes to their Received Accuracy to allow them to be more offensive and less dependent on cover to engage enemy squads effectively. Removed in-cover defense bonus (0.9 RA) -- squad retains offensive bonus in cover Reverted target size from 0.9 to 0.8 Lowered Veterancy 2 RA bonus from 0.76 to 0.78" So...? Improved in everything but doesn't get a situational RA cover bonus Their veterancy RA bonus has also been adjusted as starting RA improved. Better moving accuracy, better bren reload, better pop to avoid low mp income with pop...care to EXPLAIN where is such "hurr durr muh nerf" ? In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 14:54 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 14:15 PMMr.Smith PS: Can you make up your damn mind? Because Luchs will come out every damn game; if not only to restrict the other guy from going lieutenant. Luchs coming out isn't a prediction. It's a certainty. Tommies were nerfed and RE were mega-nerfed. Who is going to carry the PIATs and who'se going to carry the Bren guns. Also, how many guns can you really afford by the time Luchs comes out? So yeah. I dare you to find me a DBP game replay to back up your claims. Zis is just ok, the difference is minimal, usf at gun is awesome as always because of super range ability AND super fire rate. On the other hand no faction has special snowflake non doc single unit sprint on the snare unit, and you want to argue that SOVIETS can't counter a light vehicle with snare and atg ? No it's not now that crap halftrack and mg is good, but.... RE were nerfed because simply op as cheap shock unit, especially with 5 men, giving them a piat is more than an option. "Nerfs" means better out of cover performances for a minimal durability nerf of 0.9 RA ? If you win garrison play without using too much muni and get a pit you can easily get 100 spare muni for double piat and 2 bren by that time especially considering that 6 minutes luchs require okw to completely outplay the opponent, most of the time is already 6:45 Can you provide a replay of those factions struggling against luchs in dbp, and struggling against okw early ai (and luchs coming at 6 min), especially after kubel nerf ? In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview12 Dec 2017, 13:03 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 12:30 PMMr.Smith If you're going to upgrade PIATs vs an early luchs, gg; you lost the game. STG volks will run you over. Can you show us a game where upgrading PIATs vs an early luchs won you the game in DBP? If you haven't played DBP, you can always point us to one of the numerous replays uploaded by other players that feature DBP and PIATs. Ditto, for AAHT and 50cal counter to luchs. Same, for PTRS vs Luchs. Have you nerfed vickers or UC ? Then a normal replay is perfect, and there's of those. Also, 2 piats are 100 muni on RE, and then you are free to upgrade brens. Those are pretty much softcounters, especially useful at keeping luchs at bay, enough to prepare zooks, zook bug has been fixed, so your claim that it isn't enough has low to no basis honestly. Cherrypicking from my quote is useless, ptrs do its job to keep light vehicles at bay, horra at nade are a unique soviet thing, and can help zis at getting the job done. T70 comes 1 minute after max... In: Lobby