Profile of Rosbone

Free or not I will not be buying Coh3.

Well, I might buy it just so I can have the pleasure of uninstalling it

I never post about balance. As a 4v4 noob, it does not apply to me. So I do not care.

But it seems impossible to have balance with an asymmetrical design. So you will have power spikes where factions are stronger at different times.

1v1 will always be a boring meta mode. You will not win unless you play the strongest possible way. Probably the best way to help this meta is to have varying map styles to play on. I recall Tric stating this over and over. It will always be the same meta if the maps are all the same. No need to change commanders.

An example could be White Ball or Belgorod being very open maps. Meaning USF pathfinder and M8 spam will be played most of the time. Spamming assault engrs would all but guarantee a loss.

So to counter White Ball and Belgorod we have Essen Steelworks and Elst Outskirts for example. Maps that are designed for a much different style of play. If it were up to me they would all be like White Ball but Sturmpanther would not let me Muwhaaahahahahahh He is a smart guy and knows we need variety in the map pool.

I recall Tric trying to make some 1v1 maps that offered differing play styles but 1v1 players did not want to switch from the meta so the maps were not widely accepted.

Just my 2 cents and bad memory trying to make sense of some options we have for 1v1 meta.

I am not pitching a revolutionary idea or scheme, but the only way for survival for our beloved game.

A-move on Tank Destroyers makes sense and works quite well from my experience. Are you guys attack moving your mediums or something? Because that would seem really odd to me and I dont understand why you would want to do that

When I A-move a tank, it drives about 45 meters past where it should stop and shoot. Then it blows up. Same with any vehicle. Cant kite a Kubel. It either cant "see" the enemy or does the same thing tanks do where it drives right up to the enemy before shooting. The server code is complete garbage.

Without wanting to comment on the conclusion:
You've stated some wrong data. You're looking at all the games, not only at the top 200. The top 200 data back until October includes a whopping 4 games with all Soviet teams, as well as obviously way less games than the ones in your screenshot.

Thanks Hannibal. I always use the MAP STATS header which has NO OPTION for number of players

I see the STATS header does. I will have to review all of the data now. Or not, since no one cares or reads it. They just blurt some random vitriol and dip out

Seeing only 4 games as all SOVs further illustrates my point that you only see heavy SOV loaded games at level 12 and down. It also shows that the level 12 and down players have the chances to win that I posted since the stats are ALL games.

EDIT:
Seeing this top200 players only map stat made me throw up in my mouth a little.