Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Panther Accuracy14 Mar 2020, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2020, 14:50 PMLady Xenarra I believe there's a 50% accuracy penalty for firing on the move for the majority of units. Iirc Shermans have a better one and Panthers worse. The rule (which gets constantly broken as Relic's patches do not value consistency) is tanks have 0.5 moving accuracy. USF's tanks, because of their advanced suspension, get 0.75 as a faction trait. You can get the Panther's moving accuracy penalty down to zero by learning to time shots though: hit Stop just before it fires and it'll attack with full accuracy. Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2020, 16:06 PMCardboard Tank Bullshit. The game design has the Panther as a chaser unit. That means it needs accuracy. Your history argument is invalid since we have SU-85s outranging Panthers (which they couldnt) due to its role in the game. So give Panthers the accuracy. I really think buffing accuracy is the wrong approach. Even if you made them hit every shot they'd still have a hard time against heavy tanks, which they're meant to be a cost-effective counter to. It should outperform the Tiger as a heavy killer, either by bringing the Tiger down or pushing the Panther up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketens are too good13 Mar 2020, 11:57 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2020, 08:32 AMVipper Making RW 320 without allowing earlier faust will simply make OKW more prone to be bullied by allied light cars and will be major nerf to OKW early game. In addition the cost compared to the M1 seems fine. True, it would make going for a Rak to deal with the M3 scout car that much more painful. You might need to make the Sturmpio AT decent if you did that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther Accuracy13 Mar 2020, 03:18 AM The Panther already stomps everything below it in cost pretty hard. An accuracy buff would make it stomp harder without making it substantially better against the units it's too weak against: heavies. It needs a pen buff much more than an accuracy buff imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketens are too good12 Mar 2020, 20:02 PM The Raketenwerfer is a little good for what you pay for now. 55m isn't that big a disadvantage over 60m, and the 5 man squad's done wonders for its survivability. Throw retreat on top of that, and you've got a really good AT unit. It could stand to be 320 MP like the other ATGs now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment12 Mar 2020, 18:04 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 16:37 PMelchino7 He took the wise decision of why and who to argue with. D: That's a shame. Sander's usually really insightful. Even when I don't agree with him I can see where he's coming from. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment12 Mar 2020, 14:37 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2020, 11:16 AMSander93 nvm nuuu dont leave meee share your wisdom In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment11 Mar 2020, 21:22 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2020, 21:08 PMOsinyagov I don't remember the exact reason, why dozer was added in the first place. But still, this upgrade makes M4A3 into semi M4A3(105), but without 105mm gun. I'm pretty sure it's because they figured out they could add the dozer with an upgrade, decided it was cool and added it to the game. It's same reason we got the almost pointless rotating base structures and the T-34/76 variants with the tanks on the back. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment11 Mar 2020, 20:54 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2020, 20:44 PMOsinyagov I think better to change it on M4A3(105) in both commanders, where you have it, but for mech company it will means lack of M4A3(76)W. I'd swap it out for the 105 in Urban Assault and leave Mechanized with just the 76mm. It's a good tank when it's not being overshadowed by the 75mm Bulldozer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment11 Mar 2020, 17:59 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2020, 17:38 PMT.R. Stormjäger I bought Tank Hunter tactics and the doctrine got neutered and salvage was straight up removed. Where’s my refund? Don't forget the Assault Engineers we all bought Mechanized for. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment11 Mar 2020, 16:46 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2020, 15:25 PMSuperHansFan Is that a unit? No it's not. Nice backtracking I guess you feel we should delete the tiger from every doctrine because it was completely broken last patch? This is your logic. The 75mm Sherman bulldozer isn't a unit either. It's an upgrade for a unit. And if those count, where are the Penal Trooper flamers I paid for? If premium Shermans having HE is fine, then the Easy Eight and 76mm should get it too. Anyone who suggests this as a serious option belongs on the Steam Forums. If premium Shermans having HE is not fine, then the 75mm Bulldozer shouldn't have it. In: COH2 Balance