Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Tiger main gun nerf too much? (Winter patch)26 Mar 2020, 13:31 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2020, 13:19 PMKoRneY It doesn't make a terrible amount of sense when the KT still has it's aoe. The KT doesn't have speed. They removed the tank commander because the artillery strike combined with the Tiger's speed, durability and AoE made it trivally easy to take out anti-tank guns. I agree, it feels very arbitrary, but the alternative is a combo the balance team judged to be too strong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger main gun nerf too much? (Winter patch)26 Mar 2020, 13:19 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2020, 16:57 PMblvckdream After testing the new Tiger---> I think the AOE and veterancy nerfs are fine, but I don't know why the Tank Commander ability was removed on top of nerfing AOE + veterancy. The change is very very weird and counter-intuitive. I definitely agree on it being counterintuitive. Maybe it could have a preupgraded tank commander model on the top hatch, being a Command Tiger and all? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback on UI changes of the game25 Mar 2020, 16:29 PM If you need a different name for the different Hull Down, you could call it Dig In. In: Lobby
Thread: Suggestion: sight options for Ostheer and USF25 Mar 2020, 01:55 AM I think the 222 and Stuart should lose veterancy sight and gain some vet zero sight option instead. Having to vet up really undermines building them to act as scouts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Attack move23 Mar 2020, 23:38 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 22:41 PMVipper I am not sure why people claim that so difficult since a similar thing has ready been done in MOD. Which mod? SneakEye's a modder so I trust him to know what he's talking about. In: Lobby
Thread: Attack move23 Mar 2020, 22:02 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 16:00 PMVipper Well one could probably add a "invisible weapon" with no damage with max range the desired one. Even if you could, that'd be a huge amount of work, a nightmare to maintain, and judging by the Crocodile's problems could create a whole host of other issues. Tweaking Attack Move is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure you appreciate that coder time is a limited resource for the balancing team. In: Lobby
Thread: Attack move23 Mar 2020, 15:10 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 14:00 PMVipper It seem that it is simple enough to implement. Could you make a test mod for it? In: Lobby
Thread: Attack move23 Mar 2020, 13:23 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 12:39 PMVipper It could be a toggle option for QCB. The problems are: These infantries have little reason to move closer than 10 It is difficult to estimate distance Even if you do estimate correctly some model will be left behind. Perhaps. Then it's a matter of judging if the functionality is worth the extra complexity in the UI. It's mostly moot though: I'm next to certain this isn't something that could be added without a janky workaround and a ton of work to implement it. In: Lobby
Thread: Attack move23 Mar 2020, 12:26 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 12:21 PMachpawel Would be really nice if they could come at least slightly closer, because from my experience the first model starts shooting and the rest are just out of range and seem to be holidaying I find its main function for infantry is to stop them charging to their deaths: they stop and bark at you for orders. In that sense, perhaps CQC units attack moving to close might well be a bad thing. In: Lobby
Thread: Attack move23 Mar 2020, 12:09 PM While that'd be a neat feature, I very much doubt it's possible to patch in. You'd have to code that in the first place. In: Lobby