Profile of Alphrum

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 808

General Information


Thread: Raketens should lose their received accuracy bonus19 Jun 2020, 16:22 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2020, 07:01 AMEsxile I don't know why you guys are arguing around Raketen vs tanks or raketen vs other Atgun when the topic is about raketen vs infantry. I guess that because I'm right and you have no argument other than pointing your finger at something else as a distraction. yes, its true with the retreat function and RA its more better vs inf squads then other AT guns, but for me its a trade off because rekketen, is worse then other AT guns when it comes to AOE of tanks as well as its offensive performance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketens should lose their received accuracy bonus18 Jun 2020, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2020, 14:07 PMHannibal This is a very bold claim that I actually disagree with. But instead of just saying that it made no difference, can you back it up with some numbers? i think what hes saying is having a little bit of extra armour on 1 tank over another doesn't make much difference ingame as the chance to pen only changes a little bit, so small its really insignificant. Ther are more important values that make more of a difference like health, accuracy etc. Look at the panther, it had its armour nerfed and vet 0 health increased and it was a considered a survivability buff for the panther. People need to stop with this myth that allied tanks don't have well armoured tanks. One other reason as to why heavily armoured tanks on allies makes so much more of a difference when on axis, is because axis simply dont have 60 range high pen TD's so they tend to struggle more vs tanks like churchills compared to when allies have to go VS a KT. And srsly OP, REKETEN IS THE WORST AT GUN IN THE GAME AND MAN WANTS TO NERF IT. srsly OP list for me in order which u think is the best to worst AT gun : (6 pounder, reken, USF m1, PAK, and zis) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger nerf12 Jun 2020, 13:19 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jun 2020, 11:53 AMKatitof Other heavies were not buggy and they got the exact same nerf, yet no one complains about them being dead. Again, people grew so used to overpowered tiger, they can't stand a balanced one, screaming to overpower it again, because they forgot how a balanced one is supposed to look like. Its AT is superior. Its AI is still better then IS-2 and worse then Pershing, its exactly where its supposed to be performance wise compared to other 2, its not going to get brummbar-like performance again and people can't accept that. they didnt get the exact same nerf. Tiger was nerfed much more then other heavies. btw how many games have u used the tiger? let me guess 0 and you come here saying its balanced what an absolute clown. and regarding ppl comparing the tiger with isu2. Yes, the fire power of both tanks can be good in many situations (tiger more ROF, isu2 more range etc) however one thing you guys are ignoring is its survivability and counters. Tiger gets easily outraged and penned by TD's thus being much easier to counter compared to an isu2. axis TD's don't counter isu2 well enough heck they get outranged by it bar the elefant/jagd. And the only hope is to dive in with expensive panthers and the terrible moving acc and tigers to take it out. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger nerf11 Jun 2020, 14:48 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2020, 18:36 PMSkysTheLimit Do you want it to be able to do this again? And why? Heavy meta was awful for the game hes talking about long games, keeping the tiger alive for along time ofc, its going to have so many kills. If the tiger cant do that in long games then whats the point in going for it. i fully agree heavies needed a nerf, but out of all of them they gave the harshest nerfs to the tiger + keep in mind the tiger was also slightly bugged too In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UTT and the 2v2 meta - already stale?8 Jun 2020, 18:35 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 17:13 PMT.R. Stormjäger No, I said 5 man Grens are good and I was able to make good use of them in the tournament. The fact they are meta vs UKF and USF in 1v1 speaks volumes about how right I was. Your doomsday predictions were about as intelligent as the rest of your posts. haha look whos talking. Jokes aside, its quite clear allies on average have the upper hand however, i hope the balance team dont make the mistake of making drastic changes like triple nerfs/buffs. Just small teaks here and ther will do it. In: Lobby
Thread: KT thread26 May 2020, 15:35 PM Jump back to quoted post26 May 2020, 13:13 PMKatitof Its current armor is why allied TDs have pen where it is. not to previous levels, which i think was 440. right now moving it from 375 to 400 would be an option which will need testing of course. Its either that or a mobility buff which is highly unlikely. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KT thread26 May 2020, 13:12 PM increase its frontal armour In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Changes i feel grens need9 May 2020, 10:50 AM Jump back to quoted post9 May 2020, 10:32 AMEsxile Sandbag should cost manpower to build so anyone wanting to spam them early game at any point they're capping would had to think it twice. Building sandbag could also disable the capping mechanism. It is true having all mainline infantry (minus Gren) able to build sandbag but only engineer or RE to counter them is a problem today. At the moment sandbag has become a no-brainer action with hotkeys, too few downsides for it. idm cons and volks keeping ther sandbags since they both suck without ther upgrades, maybe after they both get ther upgrades (stg and 7th man), sandbags should be disabled from them. IS without a doubt should have ther sand bags removed if they maintain ther performance from the patch In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Changes i feel grens need6 May 2020, 22:40 PM Jump back to quoted post6 May 2020, 22:01 PMAerohank Conscript vs Gren matchup is fine. Any change to gren DPS will have to be matched with a MP increase. Otherwise you can just make 4 grens and win vs Soviets. The whole powercreep of double brens/double BARs for USF/Brits instead of accessible elite infantry has been a mistake. It would be a much better idea to make commandos and rangers stock options and making basic infantry only able to upgrade with 1 BAR or Bren. cons and grens match up was fine before cons got buffed. Agree with the 2nd paragraph. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Changes i feel grens need6 May 2020, 21:50 PM 5 man grens with no upgrade is just not worth it. They will never be as durable as cons , still have higher re inforce costs and without mg42/g43 will not be able to inflict damage. Look at what they will be fighting, allied squads that not only will be at least 5 man, but with single/dual upgrades, they still will get wrecked. The choice is clear, either a damage increase for grens or tone down riflemen and tommies. In: COH2 Balance