Lets be real, whilst the schwerer IS infurating and totally saves OKW players from losing games they deserve to lose (especially in 1v1s, where it denies you the ability to take all their resources and crush them off the map like you could any other faction by being placed defensively behind shotblockers on their fuel and VP), the ostheer bunker is in no way comparable 
.
All that thing does is suppress in a moderate area, and is flimsy as hell, as opposed to brit bofors being total lock down to anything but heavy armour and mortar pits barraging the hell out of a big area!
But the OST bunker is available at T0 and buildable by grens/engis. Cost is 150mp+60muni. Bofors is 280mp+30fuel. Mortar is 400. There's a pretty big cost difference comparing the two. One is a sidetech and the fuel cost delays vehicles. The other one is great for holding defensive positions while still teching normally.
Whoever made the comment about the bunkers dying to 3 AT guns and 5 mortar shots, how often do you see a mortar perfectly land 5 shells on your bunker? How often does an AT gun get vision to shoot at the bunkers? One costs pop and one does not. If you push those units early to destroy that bunker, what if you lose those units to their infantry? It's the same thing when you use a pak40, mortar to destroy a bofors and you end up losing your support weapon.
Whoever made the comment on removing vicker's becaue of bofors... bofors does not suppress unless you use it's ability (which requires HQ or a unit in it. How about I require MGs to activate their suppression with a 5-6 second delay. I'm sure many people would be unhappy with their renovated mgs.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
