I disagree.
You have every right to do so and you opinion is respected.
The only difference here is shell flight time. Low trajectory gives Scott posibility to hit moving targets if you use attack ground. Besides, if you try to do barrage from behind shot blocker, Scott uses high trajectory.
That is one difference, Scott will not autofire behind shot blockers
Still both units are single shot indirect fire with low AoE, low range and high rate of fire (distinctive from MLRS and howitzers/field guns, but still both fall under same category of gun performance). Both capable of performing HE and smoke barrage.
Yes but that does not make them the same the same way Leig or pack Howizter is not the same as mortar.
Don't know why you try to argue about semantics so much. Looks like kinda waste of time to me because it doesn't add anything to actual argument.
Well I don't know why you try to down play Scott by comparing with a mortar it is not a mortar or mortar half-truck. Mortars got a heavy nerfs in the recent patch and scott has not.
Bottom line is does not fire like mortar, it does more damage than mortar, typical counters vs mortar do not work against it, in sort it has nothing to with a mortar other that it provides support fire/smoke.
A bigger mortar is still mortar, I guess?
And of course it should be bigger, because of 70 fuel and top tier requirements.
Currently mortar are only good vs units in garrison. Scott if far deadlier and far more difficult to destroy.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
Heartless Jäger 
