Hey look, it's the guy I was talking about. Still derailing threads with petty, pointless arguments and semantics when you don't have any substance to offer, I see. This time over two almost synonymous terms.
Of course, I can humor you this once, for old time's sake. The real comparison would be you saying that a stick of 1 metric meter should in fact be longer than 40 imperial inches, because FDR and the New York bankers with the funny little hats ruined Greece - or whatever it was you used to rant about in the shout.
That would be closer to the concept of the Ostheer 'benchmark' argument over the past few years than any idea of it being used to keep other factions in measurement. Indeed - as I detailed in my post, which you likely ignored as you always do - the result of this thinking has only been the removal of Ostheer weaknesses - areas where the meaningful deviation between factions was not in Ostheer's favor. I will not repeat myself in detail as my post is right above yours and you are perfectly capable of reading it, and I will likely not respond to you again unless you decide to contribute meaningfully to the thread topic instead of behaving like this again.
"baseline" faction and removing faction design weakness are two completely different things.
Now if your argument is that that Ostheer weakness where removed/reduced well that happened to all factions and not just Ostheer.
For instance:
UKF no snares weakness now removed
USF limited access to support weapons now removed
Soviet not weapons upgrades now removed
OKW limited resources now removed
Now can you pls cut the "derail" and personal accusations (especially since you brought "baseline" into this thread) it only indicates a lack of arguments on your part.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
Heartless Jäger 
